Top 10 Barracuda Web Application Firewall Alternatives

4.1 out of 5

44 reviews
94% willing to recommend

299 followers

Top Barracuda Web Application Firewall Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Barracuda Web Application Firewall based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, and Azure Front Door. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Barracuda Web Application Firewall surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive threat protection, robust access control, and seamless integration capabilities, ensuring superior security, scalability, and performance for web applications in various environments.

Barracuda Networks Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Barracuda Networks, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks

4.2 out of 5

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks

4.2 out of 5

Barracuda Web Application Firewall attracts budget-conscious buyers with its competitive pricing and user-friendly deployment. In comparison, Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks appeals to enterprises valuing advanced security features and scalable integration, making it ideal for those prioritizing long-term protection and operational flexibility.

Download Barracuda Web Application Firewall vs. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Report

Pricing

Barracuda Web Application Firewall has a lower initial setup cost than Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks. However, Cortex Cloud offers more advanced features and scalability, potentially justifying its higher setup investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

3.6 out of 5

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

3.6 out of 5

Barracuda Web Application Firewall offers robust security and ease of use with competitive pricing, which is appealing for businesses focused on customer support and simple deployment. In comparison, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway provides advanced features and seamless integration with Azure, suitable for those needing scalable, cloud-native solutions.

Download Barracuda Web Application Firewall vs. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Report

Pricing

The Barracuda Web Application Firewall often incurs lower setup costs compared to the Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, which is generally noted for its higher initial investment but may offer extensive integration capabilities with other Azure services.

View comparison

Pricing

Azure Front Door

4.4 out of 5

Azure Front Door

4.4 out of 5

Barracuda Web Application Firewall prioritizes security with intuitive management and cost-effective solutions, making it ideal for budget-conscious enterprises. In comparison, Azure Front Door emphasizes global reach and speed with advanced features, appealing to organizations needing comprehensive load balancing and seamless cloud integrations.

Download Azure Front Door vs. Barracuda Web Application Firewall Report

Pricing

Barracuda Web Application Firewall typically involves higher setup costs compared to Azure Front Door, which offers a more competitive pricing structure. This difference highlights the affordability advantage of Azure Front Door against Barracuda's investment-intensive approach.

View comparison

Pricing

AWS WAF

4.0 out of 5

AWS WAF

4.0 out of 5

Barracuda Web Application Firewall offers robust support and competitive pricing with strong analytics, while AWS WAF provides advanced scalability and integration. In comparison, Barracuda suits cost-effective needs, while AWS WAF attracts those requiring extensive customization within AWS ecosystems despite higher investment.

Download AWS WAF vs. Barracuda Web Application Firewall Report

Pricing

Barracuda Web Application Firewall involves higher setup costs, whereas AWS WAF provides a more budget-friendly alternative, highlighting affordability as a key difference.

View comparison

Pricing

Barracuda Web Application Firewall involves higher setup costs, whereas AWS WAF provides a more budget-friendly alternative, highlighting affordability as a key difference.

F5 Advanced WAF

4.3 out of 5

F5 Advanced WAF

4.3 out of 5

Barracuda Web Application Firewall emphasizes simplicity and cost-effectiveness, appealing with its user-friendly setup and efficient support. In comparison, F5 Advanced WAF attracts with advanced security features and flexible deployment, suiting enterprises prioritizing detailed controls and sophisticated protection mechanisms.

Download Barracuda Web Application Firewall vs. F5 Advanced WAF Report

Pricing

Barracuda Web Application Firewall offers a moderate setup cost, while F5 Advanced WAF tends to have a higher initial investment, highlighting a significant pricing gap between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Barracuda Web Application Firewall offers a moderate setup cost, while F5 Advanced WAF tends to have a higher initial investment, highlighting a significant pricing gap between the two solutions.

Fortinet FortiWeb

4.0 out of 5

Fortinet FortiWeb

4.0 out of 5

Barracuda Web Application Firewall offers intuitive management and strong DDoS protection, appealing to organizations with limited IT resources. In comparison, Fortinet FortiWeb provides AI-driven threat analytics and customization, ideal for enterprises needing extensive security measures and willing to invest in advanced features.

Download Barracuda Web Application Firewall vs. Fortinet FortiWeb Report

Pricing

Barracuda Web Application Firewall has a higher setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiWeb, which offers more competitive pricing for initial deployment. Users often find Fortinet's pricing better aligned with their budget considerations during the implementation phase.

View comparison

Pricing

NetScaler

4.2 out of 5

NetScaler

4.2 out of 5

Barracuda Web Application Firewall is favored for ease of management and affordable pricing. In comparison, NetScaler is chosen for its advanced load balancing and comprehensive functionality. A tech buyer might choose Barracuda for simplicity or NetScaler for depth in features and network capabilities.

Download Barracuda Web Application Firewall vs. NetScaler Report

Pricing

Barracuda Web Application Firewall has lower setup costs compared to NetScaler, making it a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment. NetScaler, however, offers extensive features that could justify its higher setup costs for some users.

View comparison

Pricing

Imperva Web Application Firewall

4.3 out of 5

Imperva Web Application Firewall

4.3 out of 5

Barracuda Web Application Firewall offers affordable pricing and simple deployment, appealing to buyers prioritizing cost-effectiveness and user-friendly support. In comparison, Imperva Web Application Firewall provides advanced threat intelligence and analytics, attracting those seeking extensive protection and willing to invest in a robust feature set.

Download Barracuda Web Application Firewall vs. Imperva Web Application Firewall Report

Pricing

Barracuda Web Application Firewall offers a lower setup cost, while Imperva Web Application Firewall is more expensive. These pricing differences may reflect the complexity or features each solution provides.

View comparison

Pricing

Imperva DDoS

4.3 out of 5

Imperva DDoS

4.3 out of 5

Barracuda Web Application Firewall appeals to those seeking affordability and strong support experiences across varied applications. In comparison, Imperva DDoS attracts businesses needing comprehensive DDoS protection, valuing its advanced analytics, even with a higher cost for robust security solutions.

Download Barracuda Web Application Firewall vs. Imperva DDoS Report

Pricing

Barracuda Web Application Firewall involves a straightforward setup cost, while Imperva DDoS requires a more extensive initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Barracuda Web Application Firewall involves a straightforward setup cost, while Imperva DDoS requires a more extensive initial investment.

Radware Alteon

4.3 out of 5

Radware Alteon

4.3 out of 5

Radware Alteon offers extensive application delivery features like SSL-TLS acceleration and integrated security, making it ideal for high-security needs. In comparison, Barracuda Web Application Firewall provides easy setup and strong web protection, appealing to users preferring simplicity and integration capabilities.

Download Barracuda Web Application Firewall vs. Radware Alteon Report

Pricing

Radware Alteon has a higher setup cost but offers advanced features, while Barracuda Web Application Firewall presents a more economical initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Radware Alteon has a higher setup cost but offers advanced features, while Barracuda Web Application Firewall presents a more economical initial investment.

Show 2 more products

Related categories

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Container Security

Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)