Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Reviews

Name: Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
Brand: Microsoft
Rating: 3.6 (47 reviews)

Vendor: Microsoft

3.6 out of 5

47 reviews
78% willing to recommend

641 followers

Post review

What is Microsoft Azure Application Gateway?

Azure Application Gateway is a web traffic load balancer that enables you to manage traffic to your web applications. Traditional load balancers operate at the transport layer (OSI layer 4 - TCP and UDP) and route traffic based on source IP address and port, to a destination IP address and port.

Get the Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), NetScaler and more!

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is the #3 ranked solution in top Web Application Firewalls and #4 ranked solution in top Application Delivery Controllers. PeerSpot users give Microsoft Azure Application Gateway an average rating of 7.2 out of 10. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is most commonly compared to F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM): Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM). Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 63% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 16% of all views.

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

February 2025

Get the report

Helped 838,640 peers since 2012

Featured reviews

Shehzad Ali

Information Security and Compliance Officer at Carnation

We are using it for our internal application development. We are testing those features of application gateways. We are integrating it with our solutions, application, Azure Application Gateway Microsoft has a vast variety of tools, and it blends very well. It provides a range of services, so it…

Read full review

Sami

Cyber Security Consultant at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

Our company uses the solution to publish services that are on Azure. There is more than one way to publish services. You can use the Microsoft infrastructure for app services including small programming, configurations related to obligations, and publishing. Or you can publish manually by using…

Read full review

Sooryanarayan Hegde

Technical Architect at a insurance company with 5,001-10,000 employees

We use all the features. It is very useful. Using WAF, we can control the WAF rules based on our application requirements. We can control what rules should be used and what should be disabled. The role of the tool is limited to HTTP traffic. It does exactly what it must do. It's a regional service. We know how to use it for DR scenarios. WAF has been the most valuable in protecting applications. We use at least three instances in the back end to give the best performance for our applications. The management and configuration of the solution is quite easy. All certificate renewals are automatically taken care of by Key Vault.

Read full review

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway mindshare

Product category:

As of February 2025, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category stands at 8.2%, down from 11.0% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

PeerAnalyst reports

Type	Title	Date
Category	Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)	Feb 21, 2025	Download
Product	Reviews, tips, and advice from real users	Feb 21, 2025	Download
Comparison	Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs NetScaler	Feb 21, 2025	Download
Comparison	Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)	Feb 21, 2025	Download
Comparison	Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs HAProxy	Feb 21, 2025	Download

Title	Rating	Mindshare	Recommending
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)	4.1	15.4%	83%	120 interviews Add to research
NetScaler	4.2	15.5%	91%	107 interviews Add to research

Valuable Features

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is valued for its Layer 7 access, simplicity, easy integration, WAF, load balancing, autoscaling, and security features. It excels in traffic management, customization, and ease of use. Users appreciate its API integration, automatic scaling, SSL certificates, and the ability to manage web applications. The gateway offers protection against attacks, facilitates seamless deployments, and supports high performance. Its policy management and support for scaling make it a versatile choice for diverse needs.

"Microsoft has a vast variety of tools, and it blends very well."
"Microsoft has a vast variety of tools, and it blends very well."
"The solution integrates different applications and APIs securely, enhancing overall security and network optimization."

Room for Improvement

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway users suggest improvements in pricing, integration, and documentation. The application requires enhanced scalability, flexibility, and functionality. Users report difficulties with the user interface, configuration, and security features. They desire faster feature rollout and improved monitoring and reporting capabilities. The need for expanded protocol support and better support services is emphasized. They also call for more competitive features to match other leading products.

"Customer service can be improved. There is room for improvement, specifically in paid support, by providing more direct contact."
"The user interface could be better."
"The solution needs improvements in integrating different services and creating a better application balance."

ROI

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway results in notable cost and time savings by reducing the need for a large management team due to its vendor maintenance. The ease of infrastructure setup helps manage costs, though unapproved setups can lead to unexpected expenses. The possible return on investment can reach approximately 40%. The financial returns differ based on projects, and detailed cost assessments are feasible with tools like the Azure calculator.

Pricing

Enterprise users have varied experiences with Microsoft Azure Application Gateway pricing. Some find it pricey compared to other public clouds, rating it high on cost scales, while others appreciate the competitive nature due to the absence of annual licensing fees. The model is pay-as-you-go with billing based on usage, scalability, and data transfer, which some users see as reasonable. It is perceived as expensive yet cost-effective under certain Azure-integrated scenarios. Overall, it remains a strategic choice depending on specific business needs and budget.

"The solution's pricing is not complex. It is not expensive from our point of view."
"The solution is fairly priced."
"The solution is reasonably priced."

Popular Use Cases

Companies use Microsoft Azure Application Gateway primarily for securing traffic and hiding applications behind a firewall. It is utilized for load balancing, web application firewall features, and enhancing Layer 7 security. Organizations also use it for exposing services to the internet, managing web traffic, protecting applications during deployments, and integrating with solutions. It is a cost-efficient option providing redundancy, high availability, and protection against threats like denial-of-service attacks.

Service and Support

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway's customer service and support receive mixed reactions. Some find the assistance satisfactory, praising the responsiveness and support team. Others express dissatisfaction, citing long wait times and insufficient help with technical issues. There are complaints regarding repeated calls, multiple escalations, and the need for improved direct contact. Some users rate the service highly, appreciating the comprehensive advice provided, while others suggest enhancements in support quality and speed, particularly for paid support.

Deployment

Many find Microsoft Azure Application Gateway's initial setup straightforward and quick, often completed within hours. Some highlight complexities, especially in configuration, requiring technical knowledge or extra resources. Deployment times vary from a few minutes to several weeks depending on project demands. Documentation and automation tools aid the process, making it manageable for those familiar with networking concepts. While easy for some, others note difficulties at the beginner level but praise Microsoft for good support materials.

Scalability

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is considered scalable by many users, supporting varied environments and handling thousands of connections efficiently. Some users found it necessary to manage resources or adjust settings for optimal scaling. Scalability may vary based on instance sizing and integration needs. Some experienced limitations with earlier versions, while others praised its autoscale feature. Certain users noted challenges and rated scalability lower, but many reported it as suitable for medium to large-scale deployments.

Stability

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is widely reported as stable and reliable. There is mention of minor issues and some variability in ratings, from six to ten out of ten. Many users report no bugs, crashes, or freezes, with some acknowledging the need for planning and optimization. More experience may be needed for a precise assessment, but generally, it meets expectations for stability with some expressing high satisfaction.

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.