NGINX Plus and Microsoft Azure Application Gateway compete in the web traffic management category, with NGINX Plus having an edge in performance and versatility, while Azure Application Gateway excels in integration with Azure services.
Features: NGINX Plus is favored for its ability to provide load balancing, reverse proxy, and high performance with minimal resource usage, offering extensive customization and support for microservices architectures. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is known for its integration with Azure services, ease of use, and robust security features like the Web Application Firewall (WAF), making it suitable for large-scale cloud environments.
Room for Improvement: NGINX Plus could improve scalability and pricing, along with better management solutions such as graphical user interfaces; enhancements in clustering and configuration streamlining are also desired. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway needs improvements in flexibility, particularly in network prototyping, with initial deployment complexity and security features also being areas where enhancements are sought, as well as more flexible pricing.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NGINX Plus is highly versatile in hybrid and on-premises deployments, though user support often relies on community resources. Azure Application Gateway shines in public cloud deployments with seamless Azure integration but faces challenges with complex initial setups, and documentation could be improved.
Pricing and ROI: NGINX Plus offers a reasonable price for its features but can be costly when scaling. It provides a good ROI with improved application performance. Azure Application Gateway's usage-based pricing is seen as high compared to competitors, but its integration benefits within Azure provide satisfactory ROI when fully utilized in cloud environments.
We have seen a return on investment in terms of time-saving and cost-saving by not creating our own infrastructure.
There is room for improvement, specifically in paid support, by providing more direct contact.
While some people use NGINX for web servers, my current use case focuses on networking and tunneling, which does not necessitate much scaling.
I require ninety-nine point nine percent uptime, and NGINX has been pivotal in helping me achieve this along with our other DNS services.
There is room for improvement in terms of support, such as assigning agents directly for more straightforward engagement.
NGINX could provide a means to generate self-signed SSL certificates.
As with any application, there were initial issues, however, after receiving support, everything was rectified.
Azure solutions are quite expensive.
My use case involves using the free and open-source version of NGINX, making it cost-effective as I haven't incurred any costs.
The solution offers a cost advantage.
We are using it for some of the security features for our applications, particularly for securing traffic in transit with SSL.
For API management, the WebSocket, and the WebServer, NGINX provides a cost advantage, value addition, and effective support.
Azure Application Gateway is a web traffic load balancer that enables you to manage traffic to your web applications. Traditional load balancers operate at the transport layer (OSI layer 4 - TCP and UDP) and route traffic based on source IP address and port, to a destination IP address and port.
To learn more about our solution, ask questions, and share feedback, join our Microsoft Security, Compliance and Identity Community.
NGINX Plus is a versatile solution that offers load balancing, caching, proxying, and API deployment capabilities. It can be deployed on private or public clouds and is ideal for building CDN solutions. The solution can also be used to secure web applications and replace web services like Apache.
NGINX has helped organizations improve functioning, reduce downtimes, and offer a DevOps-friendly solution. Its community support and documentation are highly regarded, and its configuration is more straightforward, making it a recommended choice over HAProxy.
We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
