IIS and NGINX Plus are competing web server products in the application delivery and management category, focusing on web hosting and load balancing. NGINX Plus seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced load-balancing capabilities, making it more suitable for high-traffic environments, while IIS excels in integration within the Microsoft ecosystem.
Features: IIS offers excellent integration with Windows environments, requiring no separate licensing, and provides features like bandwidth limiting and application isolation that are essential for Microsoft-centric applications. On the other hand, NGINX Plus offers notable features like reverse proxy, advanced load balancing, and caching capabilities. Its lightweight nature and flexibility, including SSL termination and session persistence, make it highly efficient for modern web applications.
Room for Improvement: IIS could enhance its compatibility with non-Microsoft platforms and improve its monitoring and debugging features, while its security and scalability require enhancement. NGINX Plus faces challenges with pricing, requiring a more user-friendly UI, improved memory optimization, and simpler configuration. It also lacks some features present in traditional load balancers like F5.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IIS is primarily deployed on-premises, ensuring straightforward integration in Windows environments but limited flexibility for hybrid or cloud deployments. Customer service experiences vary, with users often relying on community forums. NGINX Plus, however, offers deployment flexibility, effectively supporting hybrid and cloud environments. Users have varying experiences with customer service, with some finding the community and documentation sufficient.
Pricing and ROI: IIS is cost-effective for users already within the Microsoft ecosystem since it comes as part of Windows Server without separate licensing. However, some users find the pricing high. NGINX Plus requires a paid license for advanced features, which may be costly for some. Regardless, its ROI is considered favorable due to its efficiency and comprehensive feature set, especially for enterprises needing advanced load balancing and security capabilities.
There are typically no significant issues.
It depends on the server environment and the presence of a UPS for power backup.
While some people use NGINX for web servers, my current use case focuses on networking and tunneling, which does not necessitate much scaling.
I would rate IIS's stability as an eight out of ten.
I require ninety-nine point nine percent uptime, and NGINX has been pivotal in helping me achieve this along with our other DNS services.
It's influenced by the server's service performance.
NGINX could provide a means to generate self-signed SSL certificates.
As with any application, there were initial issues, however, after receiving support, everything was rectified.
If you have a Windows license, there is no additional cost for IIS.
My use case involves using the free and open-source version of NGINX, making it cost-effective as I haven't incurred any costs.
The solution offers a cost advantage.
It is easy to publish websites with SSL, and it integrates well within the local environment and cloud.
For API management, the WebSocket, and the WebServer, NGINX provides a cost advantage, value addition, and effective support.
NGINX Plus is a versatile solution that offers load balancing, caching, proxying, and API deployment capabilities. It can be deployed on private or public clouds and is ideal for building CDN solutions. The solution can also be used to secure web applications and replace web services like Apache.
NGINX has helped organizations improve functioning, reduce downtimes, and offer a DevOps-friendly solution. Its community support and documentation are highly regarded, and its configuration is more straightforward, making it a recommended choice over HAProxy.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
