We performed a comparison between IIS and Oracle WebLogic Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Server solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The graphical user interface makes it easy for users to configure the sites."
"IIS's most valuable feature is user-friendliness."
"What I like the most is that it is easy to use."
"IIS has a very simple and user-friendly interface, which helps a lot in effective and efficient management."
"The solution is very simple to use and easy to deploy."
"The product is flexible."
"It is a lightweight web host that is easy to configure for simple webpages."
"All the features of Microsoft IIS are valuable."
"Oracle WebLogic Server has a bunch of ready features that are easy to use and understand."
"Oracle WebLogic Server is more secure and has full functionalities that can be used for big applications."
"The product's installation phase is easy."
"The product is flexible and allows us to leverage deployments."
"The only difference is that Weblogic is lighter and consumes less memory."
"It is good because it's easy to use. It doesn't crash frequently like other servers."
"In the newer system, reconfigurability and the fact that it is easy to configure, make it very valuable."
"We have some hosted servers as well as some of our own. It performs well."
"Sometimes if you are using IIS in large-scale scenarios, meaning that if you are deploying an application within IIS service and you are expecting a large number of users to use this application, you can sometimes find some problems, meaning that the service can shut down by itself unexpectedly if you don't configure your IIS with the correct configuration that can handle this number of users."
"The price of the solution could be less to improve."
"The product could be more compatible with Linux and macOS, particularly when applying user configuration policies."
"The user interface could be improved."
"The solution's scalability needs improvement."
"The platform's stability could be better."
"IIS needs to improve its security. Its support needs to be faster and clear. The tool's licensing could be cheaper as well."
"The solution's black box is not fast."
"Pricing for Oracle WebLogic Server and other Oracle products has room for improvement because the pricing model isn't easy to understand. I'd like to see lower pricing from Oracle WebLogic Server. That's the main issue with the solution."
"I can't point to anything missing."
"The logs consultant, since it tends to be more in the server, we do need complete consult logs for a lot of different files."
"If you want to use Oracle products to the fullest with enhanced customizations, you need to get trained. There is enough documentation and the flexibility to configure the application to your needs but you will need to spend more time gathering the knowledge."
"The ticket-raising process is very time-consuming"
"They should improve the solution's garbage collection feature."
"In the future, I would like to see better support for the REST interface."
"The tool's implementation should be easier. The product is also expensive."
IIS is ranked 4th in Application Server with 53 reviews while Oracle WebLogic Server is ranked 1st in Application Server with 33 reviews. IIS is rated 8.0, while Oracle WebLogic Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IIS writes " A simple and easy-to-use solution but not recommended for public apps". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle WebLogic Server writes "Offers efficient load distribution with a scope of high scalability ". IIS is most compared with NGINX Plus, Apache Web Server, Tomcat, JBoss and Microsoft .NET Framework, whereas Oracle WebLogic Server is most compared with Tomcat, JBoss, Oracle Application Server, Oracle Fusion Middleware and Oracle GlassFish. See our IIS vs. Oracle WebLogic Server report.
See our list of best Application Server vendors.
We monitor all Application Server reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
