IIS vs Windows Server AppFabric comparison

IIS and Windows Server AppFabric are both solutions in the Application Infrastructure category. IIS is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.1, while Windows Server AppFabric is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.0. IIS holds a 12.5% mindshare in AIS, compared to Windows Server AppFabric’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of IIS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Windows Server AppFabric users who would recommend it.

IIS

Read 55 IIS reviews

4,009 Views
3,066 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Windows Server AppFabric

Read 3 Windows Server AppFabric reviews

213 Views
138 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IIS

Windows Server AppFabric

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IIS and Windows Server AppFabric based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Infrastructure solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed IIS vs. Windows Server AppFabric Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

IIS vs. Windows Server AppFabric

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 816,406 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

IIS

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Server (4th)

Windows Server AppFabric

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

18th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Application Infrastructure category, the mindshare of IIS is 12.5%, down from 14.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Windows Server AppFabric is 0.6%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Infrastructure

Featured Reviews

VikramSingh6

Operations Executive at Quess

A simple and easy-to-use solution but not recommended for public apps

I would rate the overall solution a six out of ten. We have around five to six developers and engineers for the solution’s deployment and maintenance. You can use the solution if your website is not too big or complicated. However, if it is big and complicated, then you need to use Apache or Red Hat. This tool can be used for internal purposes. But if you plan to host a public app, then I wouldn’t recommend the tool.

Read full review

ArturOrdyan

IT Infrastructure Delivery Manager at HSBC

Offers good monitoring capabilities and ease of setup

My colleagues use the product to improve our company's web applications performance. I look at the server side of the tool in my company. I don't deal with the tool's caching mechanism. The monitoring and management part of the tool is good for the services of the servers used for applications in our company. A minimum of two people in our company are required to take care of the to maintain the product on a weekly basis. I recommend others opt for safe services that can be used for their businesses. I rate the tool an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product's initial setup phase is straightforward."

"The tool shows us the operating systems where our servers and applications are running."

"It is a scalable solution."

"The solution is highly reliable."

"It has an intuitive user interface and provides a lot of options for building reports."

"The solution is the easiest way to publish applications which have been designed by older development tools."

"The solution integrates well with most Microsoft products."

"The solution is very easy to use and offers a quick deployment."

More IIS pros

"It is very usable and easy to understand. Antivirus and VPN are the main features being used now. It allows my clients to access the network from home, which was very crucial because of the pandemic."

"The product's deployment phase was very easy."

"The most valuable feature is AppFabric's hosting solution, which is what we need for running workflows."

Cons

"The scalability depends on how you have set it up. If you're running IIS on a single server, it might not be as capable as if you are on many in a cluster or with load balancing and so on."

"The platform's stability could be better."

"I am using an older version of Windows Server IIS and the general management and navigation to get something done is not as straightforward as I hope it to be. The interface could be improved."

"The security must be improved."

"The user interface could be improved."

"At the moment, we have big problems with stability, and I'm not very happy at the moment. So, the stability could be improved."

"The initial setup could be made easier."

"Sometimes, we encounter difficult issues, and getting support from Microsoft to resolve those issues is not easy."

More IIS cons

"The product is unable to connect with different cloud services."

"Microsoft will stop supporting the product next year, and we can't run unsupported programs in our systems."

"Its price and licensing policy can be improved. It could be a little cheaper. Licensing is sometimes confusing. There are so many different options. It is difficult to find out what to buy or what to choose for my necessity."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the cloud system is a bit high."

"I was using the trial version of IIS inside my virtual machines."

"There is a license needed for the solution."

"We purchased a Microsoft Windows license and the license for IIS came in the package."

"I think it's part of the Windows Server, so you won't have any other costs to add in order to use the IIS service."

"The yearly licensing cost is very high. The solution is very expensive."

"IIS is expensive."

"There is no license required for the product as it is role-based. Whenever you go for a Windows platform server, the role has to be installed directly from the server manager. There is no additional cost that has to be paid for that. It is free to use."

More IIS pricing and cost advice

"It is expensive, and its licensing is a bit confusing."

"The product is affordable, in my opinion."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Which is better - IIS or NGINX Plus?

IIS is a flexible, secure, and manageable web server to host anything on the web. IIS’s scalable and open architecture can handle the most demanding tasks. From media streaming to web applications,...

See all answers

What do you like most about IIS?

The product is flexible.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IIS?

They offer a one-time payment model for the product license, and we pay annually for support. I rate the pricing an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What do you like most about Windows Server AppFabric?

The product's deployment phase was very easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Windows Server AppFabric?

The product is affordable, in my opinion.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Windows Server AppFabric?

The product is unable to connect with different cloud services. The product should be able to connect with different cloud services. The aforementioned improvement in the product can make the appli...

See all answers

Comparisons

NGINX Plus vs IIS

Compared 32% of the time

Apache Web Server vs IIS

Compared 22% of the time

Oracle WebLogic Server vs IIS

Compared 15% of the time

Tomcat vs IIS

Compared 13% of the time

JBoss vs IIS

Compared 7% of the time

More IIS Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IIS

November 2024

Download IIS product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Infrastructure

November 2024

Download Windows Server AppFabric product report

Also Known As

Windows Server IIS

No data available

Learn More

Microsoft

Overview

Internet Information Services (IIS) provides a secure, easy-to-manage, modular and extensible platform for reliably hosting websites, services and applications. With IIS, you get choice and control without giving up reliability or security.

Windows Server AppFabric extends Windows Server to provide enhanced hosting, management, and caching capabilities for Web applications and middle-tier services. The AppFabric hosting features add service management extensions to Internet Information Services (IIS), Windows Process Activation Service (WAS), and the .NET Framework 4. This includes Hosting Services and Hosting Administration tools that make it easier to deploy, configure, and manage Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) and Windows Workflow Foundation (WF) based services. The AppFabric caching features add a distributed, in-memory object cache to Windows Server that makes it easier to scale out high-performance .NET applications, especially ASP.NET applications.

Sample Customers

Erste Bank Group, NJVC, Samsung Electronics, Sheraton Hotels and Resorts, Tata Steel Europe, Urban Software Institute

OSIsoft

Buyer's Guide

IIS vs. Windows Server AppFabric

October 2024

Free Report: IIS vs. Windows Server AppFabric

Find out what your peers are saying about IIS vs. Windows Server AppFabric and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IIS vs. Windows Server AppFabric report.

See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.