Oracle WebLogic Server vs Tomcat comparison

Oracle and Apache are both solutions in the Application Server category. Oracle is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3, while Apache is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.8. Oracle holds a 25.1% mindshare in AppS, compared to Apache’s 19.9% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Apache users who would recommend it.

Oracle WebLogic Server

Read 35 Oracle WebLogic Server reviews

4,854 Views
4,307 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Tomcat

Read 51 Tomcat reviews

4,306 Views
3,427 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Oracle WebLogic Server

Tomcat

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 2, 2025

Oracle WebLogic Server and Tomcat are leading contenders in the Java application server category. WebLogic appears to have the advantage in high-performance and enterprise environments due to its comprehensive features and robust security, while Tomcat leads in lightweight and cost-effective scenarios, particularly where open-source solutions are preferred.

Features: Oracle WebLogic Server is known for its comprehensive administration console, robust clustering capabilities, and full integration with Oracle products, making it ideal for enterprise environments. It boasts high performance, stability, and security features. On the other hand, Tomcat, being lightweight and open source, offers ease of configuration and deployment, making it suitable for Java-based applications, particularly in memory-conscious environments. Its stability and large community support enhance its appeal.

Room for Improvement: Oracle WebLogic Server's challenges include lengthy startup times, complicated configurations for microservices, and a need for competitive pricing. Extensive training is also required for optimal use. Tomcat faces issues with scalability for high-traffic applications, necessitating improvements in documentation, clustering, and enhanced security features. A better centralized management console is also required to streamline operations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: WebLogic offers primarily on-premises deployment options with strong yet costly 24/7 support, though users often turn to community resources due to its complex support process. Tomcat benefits from flexible deployment across public and hybrid clouds. It is praised for its simplicity and supported by a robust community, even though enterprise-level support is limited compared to WebLogic.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle WebLogic Server's high costs stem from extensive licensing and support fees, offering significant ROI through its rich features and performance benefits in large implementations. Tomcat, being an open-source solution, has no licensing fees and minimal expenses, delivering high ROI for those seeking a cost-effective, community-supported solution.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle WebLogic Server vs. Tomcat Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle WebLogic Server vs. Tomcat

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,716 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle WebLogic Server

Ranking in Application Server

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Tomcat

Ranking in Application Server

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Application Server category, the mindshare of Oracle WebLogic Server is 25.1%, down from 26.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tomcat is 19.9%, down from 20.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Server

Featured Reviews

Saikat Nag

Oracle Application Database Administrator at RP Sanjiv Goenka Group

Offers efficient load distribution with a scope of high scalability

Our organization configures Oracle WebLogic Server in such a way that a load balancer becomes available. The network requests are segregated to the Oracle WebLogic Server as the managing server and different nodes are configured. Using the product as a load balancer helps automate request transfer from one non-functional node to another functional node. Due to Oracle WebLogic Server, the endpoints remain unaffected whenever a node goes down. The clustering feature enhances our organization's performance and reliability. In our organization, the health of the Oracle WebLogic Server environment is maintained and managed using Oracle Enterprise Manager (OEM). I would definitely recommend others to use Oracle WebLogic Server. Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Erick Karanja

Technical Lead at Cellulant Kenya

Offers high availability, straightforward deployment and easy to use

Tomcat could be a little bit more innovative. Tomcat could come up with a framework that's more lightweight and purely targeted at Java applications. Some other solutions are doing better right now, maybe because they have come up with MicroProfile, which I think is moving forward. It may actually beat Tomcat because of the lightweight nature of the framework, the MicroProfile. They're coming up with new solutions. So, for the future of Tomcat and to maintain the market share they might be looking for, they need to come up with initiatives to ensure that several of us have a lightweight framework to deploy applications on.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Oracle WebLogic Server is secure."

"I recommend the product because the installation is easy, it provides a secure environment, and it's easy to manage. The solution provides easy monitoring. Accessing all the logs is easy, and deploying application versions is smooth."

"It is efficient, not redundant, usable, scalable, and meant for enterprise applications."

"The possibility of having several servers running, so we do not lose the service."

"We can manage every application by creating a managed server and a cluster."

"The solution works well in load balancing."

"The product's installation phase is easy."

"In WebLogic, the most useful feature is the UI administration console from where we can configure everything, such as security access, and we can start and stop it graphically. That's the best feature of WebLogic Server."

More Oracle WebLogic Server pros

"The most valuable feature is the free EE server."

"Tomcat is user-friendly and easy to set up, especially compared to WebLogic or JBoss where some specialty is required. If you are going for Tomcat, you can use their guidelines and can set it up easily."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is that it supports Java Enterprise."

"Tomcat is reliable and secure, which makes it valuable for our application deployment."

"Tomcat's best feature is the open source server. It's a flexible and lightweight solution."

"I like the solution’s ease of use."

"The scalability overall is good."

"It's very stable. No problems at all. I would rate the stability a ten out of ten."

More Tomcat pros

Cons

"The solution is very expensive, and its pricing could be improved."

"There's a bug related to the managed services."

"The ticket-raising process is very time-consuming"

"I've had issues with some of the tracking features tracking and have had to go back to several generations of code to fix problems where things were touched."

"The error handling area in Oracle WebLogic Server is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"Oracle's support team fails to understand the real problem of the customer, which is why they take time to resolve issues."

"Oracle WebLogic Server's configuration could be improved because we need to do multiple configurations when setting up anything."

"The pricing is a little bit higher compared to other products."

More Oracle WebLogic Server cons

"The current procedure appears complex and could benefit from a more straightforward solution."

"The interface is not user-friendly."

"Performance optimization is an area of concern in Tomcat that should be made better."

"The disability and memory management is a problem with the solution and has room for improvement."

"Java functions should be built better into the solution."

"Sometimes, the UI part does not run properly, or the server goes down."

"Tomcat's stability could be improved, especially when handling more memory-intensive, large-scale applications."

"One way to improve the solution is by making the logging capabilities of Tomcat better by providing a logger within the server itself and making it easy to access and view the server logs. This can be especially useful when debugging issues with applications deployed on the Tomcat server. By having the ability to view both the application logs and the server logs, you can more easily identify the source of any issues and troubleshoot them more efficiently. Providing a connector or other similar feature that allows you to access the server logs from within your application can also be helpful in this regard. Having access to both the application logs and the server logs can be a valuable resource when trying to identify and resolve problems."

More Tomcat cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is expensive."

"The licensing fees are annual and depend on the model."

"I would not compare WebSphere and WebLogic because both servers are really good. The only difference is that Weblogic is lighter and consumes less memory."

"As Oracle WebLogic Server is a product from Oracle, it is bound to be an expensive solution. My company needs to make annual payments towards the licensing costs attached to the product."

"Fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"In our country, this is an expensive product."

"The licensing of the product is expensive"

"The solution's licensing is high-priced."

More Oracle WebLogic Server pricing and cost advice

"Tomcat is not costlier than other solutions."

"I give the pricing an eight out of ten."

"The tool is free."

"The solution is open source so is free."

"There are no additional costs apart from the standard license."

"Tomcat is an open source solution."

"It is an expensive product."

"The price of the solution is good."

More Tomcat pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Server solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Government

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

43%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Oracle WebLogic Server?

The product's installation phase is easy.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle WebLogic Server?

Sometimes, some issues don't get fixed by Oracle's technical support team, and you need to invest time to fix them by yourself. Oracle's support team fails to understand the real problem of the cus...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle WebLogic Server?

When we implemented Oracle Libre Suite, there is middleware, which is normally Oracle WebLogic. Many customers in Pakistan use Oracle WebLogic Middleware. Previously, it was our application server,...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tomcat?

Tomcat's ease of use has positively impacted project timelines. Tomcat already has high availability – it doesn't go down so often and doesn't require a lot of maintenance. As long as your applicat...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tomcat?

Resource configuration like JNDI and queue configuration, similar to other servers, should be provided from the admin console for Tomcat. Currently, it is done manually. The server config file must...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Tomcat?

I am using the solution at running level three. It is for running web applications.

See all answers

Comparisons

JBoss vs Oracle WebLogic Server

Compared 20% of the time

Oracle Fusion Middleware vs Oracle WebLogic Server

Compared 17% of the time

Oracle Application Server vs Oracle WebLogic Server

Compared 14% of the time

IIS vs Oracle WebLogic Server

Compared 11% of the time

IBM WebSphere Application Server vs Oracle WebLogic Server

Compared 9% of the time

More Oracle WebLogic Server Competitors

JBoss vs Tomcat

Compared 24% of the time

IBM WebSphere Application Server vs Tomcat

Compared 20% of the time

IIS vs Tomcat

Compared 11% of the time

Caucho Resin vs Tomcat

Compared 4% of the time

Oracle GlassFish vs Tomcat

Compared 4% of the time

More Tomcat Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oracle WebLogic Server

April 2025

Download Oracle WebLogic Server product report

Buyer's Guide

Tomcat

March 2025

Download Tomcat product report

Also Known As

WebLogic Application Server

No data available

Overview

Oracle WebLogic Server is widely used for deploying, managing, and monitoring Java-based applications. It's essential for core banking, e-commerce, insurance portals, and enterprise documentation management.

Businesses rely on Oracle WebLogic Server for its stability, performance, and scalability. The server supports the deployment of multiple applications, including SOAP backend services, integration apps, and interactive interfaces. It's also known for robust load distribution and serving applications on internet browsers. However, users encounter challenges like instability from updates, administration complexity, pricing concerns, and error handling issues.

What are the key features?

Performance: Delivers high performance for demanding applications.
Stability: Offers reliable operations and automatic failover with clustering.
Scalability: Scales easily to accommodate growing user demands.
Integration: Provides comprehensive and secure integration options.
Administration: User-friendly administration with built-in dashboards.
Automation: Simplifies configuration, monitoring, and script automation.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?

Enhanced Performance: Expect improvements in application performance.
Operational Reliability: Look for stability in application serving and uptime.
Scalability: Ensure easy scaling to match growth in demand.
Ease of Management: Simplified deployment and version management.
Security Features: Robust security for safe application interactions.

Oracle WebLogic Server finds implementation in industries like fintech for hosting critical applications, insurance for managing portals, and e-commerce for performance assurance. Core banking relies on it for backend services while enterprises use it for managing documentation and ERP solutions. Its usage spans client projects needing robust backend services and interactive interfacing.

Oracle

Tomcat is a reliable and efficient web server, popular for hosting and running Java-based applications. It is praised for its scalability, compatibility with different operating systems and development frameworks, and its ability to handle heavy workloads.

Users appreciate Tomcat's ease of use, robust performance, reliable server functionality, seamless integration with various platforms, extensive documentation, and strong community support.

Apache

Sample Customers

Colab Consulting Pty. Ltd., Infosys Ltd., Sascar, Banca Transilvania, UL, Center for Railway Information Systems, SPAR Austria Group, Reliance Commercial Finance, Industrial Bank of Korea, Al Jaber Group, Safe Water Kenya, Chhattisgarh Infotech and Biotech Promotion Society

1. Adobe Systems 2. Amazon 3. Apple 4. AT&T 5. Bank of America 6. Boeing 7. Cisco Systems 8. Citigroup 9. Dell 10. eBay 11. Facebook 12. General Electric 13. Google 14. Hewlett-Packard 15. IBM 16. Intel 17. JPMorgan Chase 18. Microsoft 19. Netflix 20. Oracle 21. PayPal 22. Salesforce 23. Samsung 24. Sony 25. Target 26. Twitter 27. Uber 28. Verizon 29. Visa 30. Volkswagen 31. Walmart 32. Yahoo

Buyer's Guide

Oracle WebLogic Server vs. Tomcat

April 2025

Free Report: Oracle WebLogic Server vs. Tomcat

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle WebLogic Server vs. Tomcat and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle WebLogic Server vs. Tomcat report.

See our list of best Application Server vendors.

We monitor all Application Server reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.