Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Oracle WebLogic Server vs Tomcat comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Oracle WebLogic Server
Ranking in Application Server
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
33
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Tomcat
Ranking in Application Server
2nd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
8.0
Number of Reviews
48
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Application Server category, the mindshare of Oracle WebLogic Server is 26.0%, up from 26.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tomcat is 20.1%, down from 22.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Server
 

Featured Reviews

Saikat Nag - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers efficient load distribution with a scope of high scalability
Our organization configures Oracle WebLogic Server in such a way that a load balancer becomes available. The network requests are segregated to the Oracle WebLogic Server as the managing server and different nodes are configured. Using the product as a load balancer helps automate request transfer from one non-functional node to another functional node. Due to Oracle WebLogic Server, the endpoints remain unaffected whenever a node goes down. The clustering feature enhances our organization's performance and reliability. In our organization, the health of the Oracle WebLogic Server environment is maintained and managed using Oracle Enterprise Manager (OEM). I would definitely recommend others to use Oracle WebLogic Server. Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten.
Damian Bukowski - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to use, protects applications, and the support team is responsive
The tool is deployed on the cloud. We do maintenance when certificates need updating, but we don't do the maintenance of the servers. We have about 20 engineers and administrators in our technical team. The deployment was very simple. We got a guide from Apache. Everything was explained very clearly. The deployment took a couple of days.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The technical support is responsive. They are always ready to help by various communication channels, such as Zoom calls. However, sometimes it will take a while because when we are dealing with a problem, they need to look at the logs and configuration. A lot of the issues are related to the configuration that they need to look at thoroughly before they can give us a solution and it can take a few days depending on the type of problem."
"It has helped us to have different clusters within different servers, which allows us to identify hacker attacks."
"It's a scalable product."
"What I find most valuable in Oracle WebLogic Server is its flexibility in administering and managing applications, along with the built-in dashboards that offer high visibility into vulnerabilities."
"Another valuable feature is the ability to automate tasks through scripts, making our environment highly efficient."
"The product is flexible and allows us to leverage deployments."
"WebLogic is reliable, and it's easy to use for development."
"Oracle WebLogic Server has a bunch of ready features that are easy to use and understand."
"Our company doesn't face any stability issues while using Tomcat."
"Tomcat is a single-server solution for deploying applications that can scale effectively. It's a good choice because it simplifies deployment. Once you package your application, deployment is straightforward and efficient."
"It's very stable. No problems at all. I would rate the stability a ten out of ten."
"The product's most valuable feature is the ability to host applications."
"I love Tomcat for its scalability, reliability, availability, and steadiness."
"The product is easy to use."
"The solution is convenient. It is a comfortable and easy-to-use solution for my use cases."
"I would rate the pricing a ten out of ten, where one is high price and ten is low price. The pricing is pretty low."
 

Cons

"Oracle WebLogic Server's configuration could be improved because we need to do multiple configurations when setting up anything."
"They should improve the solution's garbage collection feature."
"Licensing fees need improvement."
"Its pricing should be better. We are analyzing other options, such as JBoss, because of the cost of WebLogic."
"Managing and monitoring the WebLogic server environment has been challenging because most monitoring tools don't support it."
"I can't point to anything missing."
"The integration could be improved."
"Oracle's support team fails to understand the real problem of the customer, which is why they take time to resolve issues."
"I would also like to see a dashboard with some integrations in order to see the logs and trace performance easier."
"It will be useful if a direct report concerning a particular server configuration or application usage is readily available in the dashboard."
"The high availability is not as robust as the competition is such as WebLogic and Jboss."
"In the solution, we are using the terminal to enter command line codes for operations and management, this is difficult for me. It would be better if we had some administrator UI tools for this."
"The stability must be improved."
"The disability and memory management is a problem with the solution and has room for improvement."
"Sometimes we face issues with the private and public networks and ensuring that once Tomcat is installed, that it is secure."
"The interface is not user-friendly."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing fees are annual and depend on the model."
"It is expensive."
"My company uses a licensed version of the product, so we get Oracle's support."
"The solution’s pricing is affordable."
"As Oracle WebLogic Server is a product from Oracle, it is bound to be an expensive solution. My company needs to make annual payments towards the licensing costs attached to the product."
"The licensing of the product is expensive"
"In our country, this is an expensive product."
"Fees are paid on a yearly basis."
"It's open-source. We don't pay for the license."
"We are currently using the open-source version."
"It is an open-source tool and is free of cost."
"This is an open-source product and it's free to use."
"Tomcat is open-source and free to use."
"The solution is open source so is free."
"We are using the open-source version."
"The solution is free."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Server solutions are best for your needs.
816,816 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
20%
Computer Software Company
13%
Government
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Educational Organization
45%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
7%
Government
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Oracle WebLogic Server?
Sometimes, some issues don't get fixed by Oracle's technical support team, and you need to invest time to fix them by yourself. Oracle's support team fails to understand the real problem of the cus...
What is your primary use case for Oracle WebLogic Server?
I use the solution in my company since few customers use WebLogic applications and also since they have a few number of applications deployed on it.
What do you like most about Tomcat?
Tomcat's ease of use has positively impacted project timelines. Tomcat already has high availability – it doesn't go down so often and doesn't require a lot of maintenance. As long as your applicat...
What needs improvement with Tomcat?
Perhaps there could be an easier way to configure some advanced features. The learning curve to earn advanced skills is too steep.
What is your primary use case for Tomcat?
I have used Apache Tomcat for various applications in our operational environment. We are a traffic service provider, and our operational department needs various types of proprietary applications.
 

Also Known As

WebLogic Application Server
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Colab Consulting Pty. Ltd., Infosys Ltd., Sascar, Banca Transilvania, UL, Center for Railway Information Systems, SPAR Austria Group, Reliance Commercial Finance, Industrial Bank of Korea, Al Jaber Group, Safe Water Kenya, Chhattisgarh Infotech and Biotech Promotion Society
1. Adobe Systems 2. Amazon 3. Apple 4. AT&T 5. Bank of America 6. Boeing 7. Cisco Systems 8. Citigroup 9. Dell 10. eBay 11. Facebook 12. General Electric 13. Google 14. Hewlett-Packard 15. IBM 16. Intel 17. JPMorgan Chase 18. Microsoft 19. Netflix 20. Oracle 21. PayPal 22. Salesforce 23. Samsung 24. Sony 25. Target 26. Twitter 27. Uber 28. Verizon 29. Visa 30. Volkswagen 31. Walmart 32. Yahoo
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle WebLogic Server vs. Tomcat and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,816 professionals have used our research since 2012.