Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Oracle WebLogic Server vs Tomcat comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 2, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.3
Oracle WebLogic Server offers long-term benefits, optimizing deployment and performance despite high initial costs and expertise requirements.
Sentiment score
8.7
Tomcat delivers quick ROI with minimal investment, offering scalability, ease of deployment, and significant time and cost savings.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.8
Oracle WebLogic Server support is reliable but costly, with mixed reviews on response times and first-level knowledge.
Sentiment score
6.3
Tomcat's support relies heavily on community and documentation, with limited formal assistance but effective community engagement and consultation services.
We have the portal, which is appropriately escalated based on the severity of the ticket.
Regional Head And Director Product Development at Neptune Software Group
I would rate customer service and support from Oracle for this product as either nine or ten.
IT Consultant at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
They are proactive in looking into the tickets we create in case we have unresolved queries.
Project Manager at Capgemini
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.5
Oracle WebLogic Server is scalable, suitable for large datasets; challenges may arise with configurations, but offers high ratings.
Sentiment score
7.6
Tomcat offers high scalability and adaptability, excelling in cloud environments with positive user feedback on its reliability.
I find Oracle WebLogic Server to be highly scalable, rating it as nine out of ten.
IT Consultant at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
The biggest benefit I see from Oracle WebLogic Server is that it is beneficial; we are stable through a large volume of transactions.
Regional Head And Director Product Development at Neptune Software Group
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.9
Oracle WebLogic Server is reliable with high stability ratings but has minor memory and update-related concerns.
Sentiment score
7.9
Tomcat is stable and reliable for small applications, needing careful configuration and updates for optimal performance with high traffic.
 

Room For Improvement

Oracle WebLogic Server needs better integration, microservices support, stability, memory management, customer support, and simpler configurations.
Tomcat struggles with compatibility, scalability, speed, unfriendly interface, high memory use, and needs better security, documentation, and performance.
Using scripting allows for the creation of resources.
IT Consultant at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Tomcat needs a more robust logging error details feature; the current logging feature is available, but it should be more user-friendly.
Project Manager at Capgemini
 

Setup Cost

Oracle WebLogic Server's per-core pricing can be costly, especially compared to free alternatives like JBoss or Tomcat.
Tomcat is cost-effective, open-source, with potential additional costs for licenses and optional paid support services.
We are working with an embedded license; for us, it is acceptable, but in reality, the open full license will be costly because it is a number-of-core-based licensing.
Regional Head And Director Product Development at Neptune Software Group
 

Valuable Features

Oracle WebLogic Server provides robust features like scalability, security, and reliability, making it ideal for enterprise applications.
Tomcat is popular for its lightweight, high performance, scalability, and open-source compatibility, ideal for Java-based applications.
I can expand the cluster by creating more servers and several clusters within the same domain.
IT Consultant at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
I am able to have a highly scalable, highly demanding, enterprise deployment.
Regional Head And Director Product Development at Neptune Software Group
The advantages of Tomcat include its flexibility; we can increase the heap memory and the size of sessions as per our custom needs.
Project Manager at Capgemini
 

Categories and Ranking

Oracle WebLogic Server
Ranking in Application Server
3rd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
36
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Tomcat
Ranking in Application Server
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
52
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Application Server category, the mindshare of Oracle WebLogic Server is 14.7%, down from 26.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tomcat is 14.7%, down from 19.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Server Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Tomcat14.7%
Oracle WebLogic Server14.7%
Other70.6%
Application Server
 

Featured Reviews

Thomas Waltair - PeerSpot reviewer
Regional Head And Director Product Development at Neptune Software Group
Stable and scalable enterprise deployment with Cloud-Native support
Oracle WebLogic Server helps with my deployment strategy in both monolithic as well as Cloud-Native ways. I think it is useful; this Cloud-Native support helps with deployment in both on-prem and cloud. For container deployment, we are not very rich. We are in the process of moving our business logic to containerization. But in terms of this being a big product, a core banking system, I prefer on-prem rather than cloud. The use cases and the scrum help me a lot in an iterative, incremental manner. I would recommend this product; it is an enterprise, large volume, and of course, it is worth it to deploy. I am providing this review with a rating of 9.
Sanjay Sahu - PeerSpot reviewer
Project Manager at Capgemini
Customization and flexibility enhance web applications while support effectively resolves queries
Regarding improvements in Tomcat, I personally haven't used it very extensively, but all Apache products are very useful for our web applications. Although the web server setup is a little different, it has everything we have been using, and as of now, everything is good with no deficiencies that need improvement. I think that Tomcat needs a more robust logging error details feature; the current logging feature is available, but it should be more user-friendly. This improvement would make error handling more user-friendly.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Server solutions are best for your needs.
879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Government
10%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
23%
Government
13%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Computer Software Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business15
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise17
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business22
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise28
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Oracle WebLogic Server?
There is an option to use the WebLogic console as a service, but the WebLogic scripting tool can be used for the administration of the domain without the console. This is important for some cases d...
What is your primary use case for Oracle WebLogic Server?
I primarily work from an infrastructure point of view with Oracle WebLogic Server ( /products/oracle-weblogic-server-reviews ). I am involved in the installation, base installation of the product, ...
What do you like most about Tomcat?
Tomcat's ease of use has positively impacted project timelines. Tomcat already has high availability – it doesn't go down so often and doesn't require a lot of maintenance. As long as your applicat...
What needs improvement with Tomcat?
Regarding improvements in Tomcat, I personally haven't used it very extensively, but all Apache products are very useful for our web applications. Although the web server setup is a little differen...
What is your primary use case for Tomcat?
We use Tomcat for various purposes, and our company finds it to be perfect; we are getting all the solutions out of that. There is still no chance of any migration to any other technology, but addi...
 

Also Known As

WebLogic Application Server
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Colab Consulting Pty. Ltd., Infosys Ltd., Sascar, Banca Transilvania, UL, Center for Railway Information Systems, SPAR Austria Group, Reliance Commercial Finance, Industrial Bank of Korea, Al Jaber Group, Safe Water Kenya, Chhattisgarh Infotech and Biotech Promotion Society
1. Adobe Systems 2. Amazon 3. Apple 4. AT&T 5. Bank of America 6. Boeing 7. Cisco Systems 8. Citigroup 9. Dell 10. eBay 11. Facebook 12. General Electric 13. Google 14. Hewlett-Packard 15. IBM 16. Intel 17. JPMorgan Chase 18. Microsoft 19. Netflix 20. Oracle 21. PayPal 22. Salesforce 23. Samsung 24. Sony 25. Target 26. Twitter 27. Uber 28. Verizon 29. Visa 30. Volkswagen 31. Walmart 32. Yahoo
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle WebLogic Server vs. Tomcat and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.