Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway pros and cons

Vendor: Microsoft

3.6 out of 5

46 reviews
78% willing to recommend

639 followers

Pros & Cons summary

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is renowned for load balancing and web application firewall protection, enhancing security and performance. It integrates with other applications and APIs and offers customization for traffic management. Effective against Layer 7 attacks, it supports system monitoring. However, high pricing, integration issues with Service Mesh, configuration complexities, and scalability concerns are noted. Better documentation and customer support are necessary, particularly in response time and detail.

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway provides access to Layer 7, allowing users to control requests and content on the network.

The Web Application Firewall (WAF) feature is highly valued for preventing layer 7 attacks and replicating firewall capabilities.

The solution is noted for its ease of integration with existing Azure systems and applications, facilitating smooth operation.

Load balancing capabilities are praised for efficiently distributing traffic and enhancing performance and security.

Scalability is strong, supporting over 1000 users daily with effective domain mapping and security management.

CONS

Pricing could be improved and currently is considered high by users.

Integration with existing systems and services needs enhancement.

Support and documentation require improvements for better user experience.

Flexibility and scalability of features are limited, affecting performance and upgrades.

Security features are insufficient, with issues in certificate handling and firewall capabilities.

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Pros review quotes

reviewer2226693

Architect at SoftwareONE

Jul 11, 2023

I find Application Gateway’s WAF module valuable because it helps prevent layer 7 attacks.

Read full review

reviewer1288212

Network Administrator at a government with 201-500 employees

Sep 27, 2020

The solution was very easy to configure. It wasn't hard at all to adjust it to our needs.

Read full review

Rushad Anklesaria

Azure Consultant at CoreAzure

Jan 29, 2024

The product's initial setup phase was easy.

Read full review

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

Free Report: Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about Microsoft Azure Application Gateway. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2024.

824,145 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Sooryanarayan Hegde

Technical Architect at a insurance company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Feb 20, 2024

We can control what rules should be used and what should be disabled.

Read full review

Cyber Security Consultant at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

Nov 29, 2022

The solution has built-in rules that reduce alerts and are easy to configure.

Read full review

IT Manager at Nivaata System Pvt ltd

Aug 23, 2021

It has a filter available, although we are not currently using it because it is not part of our requirements. But it is a good option and when it becomes part of our requirements we will definitely use it.

Read full review

RJ

Ravilla Jaisimha

Software Architect at a sports company with 501-1,000 employees

May 9, 2024

Application Gateway automatically redirects unwanted users and takes care of the security aspect. It also handles the performance side of things, which is why we use it.

Read full review

SJ

Senior Software Engineer at Varian Medical Systems, Inc.

May 20, 2020

This is a SaaS product, so it is always up to date.

Read full review

TK

IT Consultant at productive it solutions

Feb 9, 2022

The health probe is pretty good for your backend health. It tells you whether it's communicating and talking to the endpoint correctly. It is quite useful.

Read full review

SS

Azure Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Jan 26, 2024

In my experience, Microsoft products have a smooth integration and facilitate easy management and monitoring. Using Azure Application Gateway allows us to efficiently handle the system loads.

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 42)

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Cons review quotes

reviewer2226693

Architect at SoftwareONE

Jul 11, 2023

Application Gateway’s limitation is that the private and the public endpoint cannot use the same port.

Read full review

reviewer1288212

Network Administrator at a government with 201-500 employees

Sep 27, 2020

The security of the product could be adjusted.

Read full review

Rushad Anklesaria

Azure Consultant at CoreAzure

Jan 29, 2024

The tool is a pain to deal with when it comes to the area of configuration.

Read full review

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

Free Report: Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about Microsoft Azure Application Gateway. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2024.

824,145 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Sooryanarayan Hegde

Technical Architect at a insurance company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Feb 20, 2024

The solution doesn’t support wildcard-based and regular expression-based rules.

Read full review

Cyber Security Consultant at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

Nov 29, 2022

The graphical interface needs improvement because it is not user friendly.

Read full review

Charles Salameh

Senior Cloud Engineer at Netcetera AG

Jun 22, 2023

The solution has many limitations. You cannot upgrade the VPN to the application gateway. So I started with version one, which has limited capabilities, and they provided version two. And unfortunately, I cannot upgrade from v one to v two like other services. So I have to decommission the version one and create a new one with version two. Also the version one was complex with the certificates uploading the SQL certificates.

Read full review

IT Manager at Nivaata System Pvt ltd

Aug 23, 2021

It takes a lot of time for a certificate to update in the system. That is a huge drawback, affecting the load-balancing side. And when there are changes to the load balancing, it affects the end-user.

Read full review

RJ

Ravilla Jaisimha

Software Architect at a sports company with 501-1,000 employees

May 9, 2024

We have encountered some issues with automatic redirection and cancellation, leading to 502 and 504 gateway errors. So, I experienced some trouble with containers.

Read full review

SJ

Senior Software Engineer at Varian Medical Systems, Inc.

May 20, 2020

For the first-time user, it is difficult to understand so the user-interface needs to be improved.

Read full review

TK

IT Consultant at productive it solutions

Feb 9, 2022

It is a bit tricky to configure. You've got to have a very specific format to configure it. They should make it a little bit easier to configure. Mapping the certificates into it isn't easy, and it could be better. Currently, you've to write a bit of automation to pull certificates directly to HTTPS.

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 43)

Product Categories

Product Categories

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

HAProxy vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

NetScaler vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

NGINX Plus vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

Fortinet FortiADC vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

Kemp LoadMaster vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

Radware Alteon vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

A10 Networks Thunder ADC vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

VMWare Avi Load Balancer vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

Amazon Elastic Load Balancing vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

See all alternatives

Product Categories

Product Categories

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

HAProxy vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

NetScaler vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

NGINX Plus vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

Fortinet FortiADC vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

Kemp LoadMaster vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

Radware Alteon vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

A10 Networks Thunder ADC vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

VMWare Avi Load Balancer vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

Amazon Elastic Load Balancing vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

See all alternatives

Related questions

507

What's the difference between Azure Front Door and Application Gateway?

132

How does AWS WAF compare to Microsoft Azure Application Gateway?

33

What are the pros and cons of F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway for a large construction company?

13

When evaluating Application Delivery Controllers, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?

216

Comparison Between Kemp LoadMaster and Load Balancer.org

42

Is Citrix ADC (formerly Netscaler) the best ADC to use and if not why?

45

What are your daily F5 BIG-IP LTM use cases?

65

Why do I need an ADC solution?

53

What is the best ADC solution?

1

Why is Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) important for companies?