A10 Networks Thunder ADC and Microsoft Azure Application Gateway both compete in the application delivery controller category. A10 Networks Thunder ADC seems to have the upper hand in advanced traffic management and security due to its feature set, while Microsoft Azure Application Gateway excels in scalability and integration within Azure ecosystems.
Features: A10 Networks Thunder ADC offers all-inclusive licensing simplifying management, SSL offloading supporting robust security, and a single pane dashboard for traffic analysis. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway integrates with Azure services, automates deployment and updates, and offers comprehensive WAF capabilities, excelling in scalability and ease of cloud integration.
Room for Improvement: A10 Networks Thunder ADC faces limited third-party integrations and cloud support deficiencies, which can hinder scalability in containerized environments. Its predominantly Asia-focused support may be inconvenient for US users. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is deemed costly, confined to Azure environments limiting third-party tool integration, and its UI and documentation need enhancement, particularly its AWS's WAF.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: A10 Networks Thunder ADC supports mainly on-premises deployment but offers highly responsive customer service. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, known for its cloud flexibility, supports hybrid and public environments but is criticized for complex initial setups. Microsoft's support, though robust, lacks the personalization found with A10.
Pricing and ROI: A10 Networks Thunder ADC's all-inclusive pricing model is seen as advantageous, with users reporting significant ROI from cost savings in support and operational efficiency. Despite high initial costs, lower support expenses offset the investment. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway follows a pay-as-you-go model, which reduces unnecessary expenses while allowing scalability, though additional costs for advanced features are reported.
If we can use a shared resource, then the return on investment is really nice.
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway significantly impacts our cost savings while maintaining higher performance.
We have seen a return on investment in terms of time-saving and cost-saving by not creating our own infrastructure.
I would say they provide the best support for Application Gateway because they own the product, so their support is top-notch.
There is room for improvement, specifically in paid support, by providing more direct contact.
I would rate Microsoft support as good because they have a very skilled technical support team in the background
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is a very scalable product.
It has the autoscaling feature, so there is not much concern around performance; it can scale significantly.
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is a scalable solution.
We have been using it for the past two to three years, and there have been good results with no problems so far.
The stability is good, and except for a few instances, I don't see the non-availability of Azure Cloud services.
One feature I mentioned is the support for non-HTTPS protocols such as TCP, which could allow one endpoint for all kinds of protocols.
There is room for improvement in terms of support, such as assigning agents directly for more straightforward engagement.
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway has room for improvement because it offers many features, but its configuration is a bit difficult, at least from the developer point of view.
We would prefer to have it cheaper, but it is still expensive.
Azure solutions are quite expensive.
When it comes to pricing for Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, I would rate it a seven out of ten.
We are using it for some of the security features for our applications, particularly for securing traffic in transit with SSL.
The Web Application Firewall (WAF) in Microsoft Azure Application Gateway has been very effective in protecting applications from security threats.
We find mutual TLS valuable because we can verify the client securely by setting up the trust certificate of the client, and also if we do it at the client side as well.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Azure Application Gateway | 6.6% |
| A10 Networks Thunder ADC | 5.6% |
| Other | 87.8% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 11 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 22 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 24 |
A10 Networks Thunder ADC is a dynamic application delivery controller and advanced load balancer. Thunder ADC is a value-added solution provided by A10 Networks specializing in robust, trusted, scalable application services for cloud, hybrid, edge cloud, and on-premise environments focused on improving business processes and keeping infrastructures safe. The solution consistently provides server availability, improves content delivery, and protects at-risk applications. A10 Networks Thunder ADC easily controls hybrid and multi-cloud deployments using a Polynimbus strategy to minimize difficulties and costs for IT processes, facilitating overall improved business results.
A10 Networks Thunder ADC is effective for small to medium businesses (SMBs) to large enterprises. Service providers and cloud operators are all using A10 Network ADC to manage their large and fast-growing group of business-critical applications.
A10 Networks Thunder ADC supplies L4-7 load balancing with numerous layers of security using DNS and web app firewalls, comprehensive support for advanced encryption, single sign-on (SSO) authentication, and high-performance Perfect Forward Secrecy and Error Correction Code (PFS/ECC). Thunder ADC is designed upon A10 Networks Advanced Core Operating System (ACOS®) platform to provide consistent, efficient application performance and trusted security for any environment.
A10 Networks Thunder ADC Benefits
A10 Networks Thunder ADC Features
Azure Application Gateway is a web traffic load balancer that enables you to manage traffic to your web applications. Traditional load balancers operate at the transport layer (OSI layer 4 - TCP and UDP) and route traffic based on source IP address and port, to a destination IP address and port.
To learn more about our solution, ask questions, and share feedback, join our Microsoft Security, Compliance and Identity Community.
We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
