Discover the top alternatives and competitors to A10 Networks Thunder ADC based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), and NetScaler.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
A10 Networks Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with A10 Networks, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
A10 Networks Thunder ADC appeals with comprehensive licensing, high performance, and security focus. In comparison, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway emphasizes seamless Azure integration, cost-effectiveness, and scalability. Tech buyers might choose A10 for integration versatility, while Azure attracts those prioritizing cloud-native environments.
A10 Networks Thunder ADC has a higher initial setup cost compared to Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, which offers more cost-effective setup options for businesses.
A10 Networks Thunder ADC has a higher initial setup cost compared to Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, which offers more cost-effective setup options for businesses.
A10 Networks Thunder ADC offers inclusive licensing and advanced traffic management for cost-effective solutions. In comparison, F5 BIG-IP LTM provides modular architecture and extensive customization via iRules, suiting buyers seeking comprehensive features and a higher investment for enhanced security and performance.
A10 Networks Thunder ADC simplifies cost management with all-inclusive licensing and integrates advanced security, ideal for managing diverse resources. In comparison, NetScaler by Citrix offers flexible deployment and robust features, despite requiring separate purchases for additional licenses.
A10 Networks Thunder ADC offers a lower setup cost, while NetScaler presents a higher initial expense, highlighting a significant difference in upfront investment.
A10 Networks Thunder ADC offers a lower setup cost, while NetScaler presents a higher initial expense, highlighting a significant difference in upfront investment.
A10 Networks Thunder ADC offers all-inclusive licensing and robust security, appealing to those needing advanced traffic management and DDoS mitigation. In comparison, HAProxy excels in stability and customization, ideal for users desiring flexibility and lower upfront costs without licensing fees.
A10 Networks Thunder ADC has a moderate setup cost, while HAProxy is known for being cost-effective. This difference highlights a contrast in initial investment requirements between the two solutions.
A10 Networks Thunder ADC has a moderate setup cost, while HAProxy is known for being cost-effective. This difference highlights a contrast in initial investment requirements between the two solutions.
A10 Networks Thunder ADC offers robust security, load balancing, and flexibility, suitable for those seeking cost-effective, inclusive licensing. In comparison, NGINX Plus provides excellent modularity and performance, ideal for environments requiring scalable architectures and advanced features, despite its higher pricing model.
A10 Networks Thunder ADC is noted for its high initial setup cost, while NGINX Plus offers a more affordable setup option, highlighting a significant price difference between the two products.
A10 Networks Thunder ADC is noted for its high initial setup cost, while NGINX Plus offers a more affordable setup option, highlighting a significant price difference between the two products.
A10 Networks Thunder ADC offers an all-inclusive licensing scheme with comprehensive traffic management and security features, appealing for its cost predictability. In comparison, Fortinet FortiADC provides flexible integration with other Fortinet products, ideal for users seeking tailored feature access through variable licensing.
A10 Networks Thunder ADC offers advanced features like scripting and DDoS mitigation for complex scenarios. In comparison, Kemp LoadMaster provides affordability and ease of use, appealing to tech buyers needing basic load balancing and virtualization support while minimizing integration complexities.
A10 Networks Thunder ADC has a higher setup cost compared to Kemp LoadMaster, making Kemp's solution more budget-friendly. A10 Networks' features may justify the added expense for users seeking robust capabilities.
A10 Networks Thunder ADC has a higher setup cost compared to Kemp LoadMaster, making Kemp's solution more budget-friendly. A10 Networks' features may justify the added expense for users seeking robust capabilities.
A10 Networks Thunder ADC offers all-inclusive licensing and excels in traffic management and security, ideal for diverse environments. In comparison, Radware Alteon emphasizes application protection and customization, appealing to those focused on load-balancing and threat mitigation.
A10 Networks Thunder ADC has a relatively lower setup cost, making it more budget-friendly, while Radware Alteon may involve higher initial expenses, reflecting its advanced features and premium capabilities.
A10 Networks Thunder ADC has a relatively lower setup cost, making it more budget-friendly, while Radware Alteon may involve higher initial expenses, reflecting its advanced features and premium capabilities.
A10 Networks Thunder ADC offers cost-effective solutions with all-inclusive licensing and advanced traffic management, making it ideal for straightforward deployments. In comparison, VMWare Avi Load Balancer excels in complex environments with feature-rich capabilities, analytics, and flexible deployment options across various cloud environments.
A10 Networks Thunder ADC has a competitive setup cost recognized for its affordability, while VMWare Avi Load Balancer is noted for its higher initial expense, reflecting enhanced features.
A10 Networks Thunder ADC has a competitive setup cost recognized for its affordability, while VMWare Avi Load Balancer is noted for its higher initial expense, reflecting enhanced features.
A10 Networks Thunder ADC offers advanced traffic management and IPv6 support with competitive pricing. In comparison, Loadbalancer.org provides essential load balancing suited for non-technical environments. A10 includes third-party security, while Loadbalancer.org excels in pricing flexibility and ease of management.
A10 Networks Thunder ADC has a higher setup cost compared to Loadbalancer.org, highlighting a significant cost difference that potential buyers should consider.
A10 Networks Thunder ADC has a higher setup cost compared to Loadbalancer.org, highlighting a significant cost difference that potential buyers should consider.
A10 Networks Thunder ADC offers superior performance and scalability, appealing to enterprises needing advanced traffic management. In comparison, Barracuda Load Balancer ADC provides user-friendly configuration with robust security features, making it ideal for businesses prioritizing simplicity and protection.
A10 Networks Thunder ADC setup costs are higher than Barracuda Load Balancer ADC, highlighting a more significant initial investment for A10 Networks, while Barracuda offers a more budget-friendly setup cost option.
A10 Networks Thunder ADC setup costs are higher than Barracuda Load Balancer ADC, highlighting a more significant initial investment for A10 Networks, while Barracuda offers a more budget-friendly setup cost option.
A10 Networks Thunder ADC provides comprehensive security features and cost-effective licensing, appealing to those prioritizing security and savings. In comparison, Radware LinkProof focuses on DNS management and link load balancing, ideal for those needing dependable traffic distribution and reliability.
