A10 Networks Thunder ADC vs Kemp LoadMaster comparison

A10 Networks and Progress Software are both solutions in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category. A10 Networks is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.0, while Progress Software is ranked #8 with an average rating of 9.0. A10 Networks holds a 5.0% mindshare in ADC, compared to Progress Software’s 7.3% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of A10 Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Progress Software users who would recommend it.

A10 Networks Thunder ADC

Read 22 A10 Networks Thunder ADC reviews

2,646 Views
1,901 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Kemp LoadMaster

Read 49 Kemp LoadMaster reviews

5,149 Views
2,900 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

A10 Networks Thunder ADC

Kemp LoadMaster

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

A10 Networks Thunder ADC and Kemp LoadMaster both compete in the application delivery controller category. A10 Networks Thunder ADC appears to have an upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set and cost-effectiveness.

Features: A10 Networks Thunder ADC is noted for its all-inclusive licensing model which simplifies budget management, advanced DDoS mitigation, and SSL offloading. These features make it ideal for enterprises handling mixed traffic across on-premise and cloud resources. Kemp LoadMaster is recognized for ease of deployment, stability, and a competitive cost-to-feature ratio, making it suitable for straightforward ADC needs lacking advanced security measures.

Room for Improvement: A10 Networks Thunder ADC could improve its third-party integration options and address regional support discrepancies causing delays. Resolving legal issues with Brocade and enhancing immediacy in support could also benefit users. Kemp LoadMaster might enhance security features and GUI usability, and integrate modern visualization tools and better certificate management. Users suggest more comprehensive documentation and intuitive updates for advanced configurations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: A10 Networks Thunder ADC is often deployed on-premises, but users report delays in support during emergencies, and highlight a need for improved first-call resolutions and better training resources. Kemp LoadMaster is praised for its straightforward setup and reliable third-party support across varied deployments, with customer service improving satisfaction despite a call for more proactive support.

Pricing and ROI: A10 Networks Thunder ADC is perceived as cost-effective, offering a solid return on investment by simplifying configuration and saving on support contracts. It competes well with more expensive solutions like F5. Kemp LoadMaster's competitive pricing and trial options make it attractive for clients seeking cost-effective ADC solutions, with licensing flexibility enhancing its appeal against pricier alternatives.

To learn more, read our detailed A10 Networks Thunder ADC vs. Kemp LoadMaster Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

A10 Networks Thunder ADC vs. Kemp LoadMaster

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,158 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

A10 Networks Thunder ADC

Ranking in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

10th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Kemp LoadMaster

Ranking in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

8th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category, the mindshare of A10 Networks Thunder ADC is 5.0%, up from 4.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kemp LoadMaster is 7.3%, up from 7.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

Featured Reviews

SatishBabu

Vice President at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Known for its load balancing capabilities, the WAF features need to be improved

The solution's initial setup process was easy. For the installation, it takes around five minutes. One person can do the maintenance since it is not required much. So, it's a one-time solution, and its maintenance is fine. The number of people required for maintenance depends on the clients as well. One or two engineers are fine to serve around a hundred clients. If you have a number of devices, more people are needed for their maintenance because of the patching it requires during regular operations. Only for the maintenance, one engineer's fine. However, for regular operations, we need multiple people.

Read full review

PeterForster

Senior Consultant at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

A highly stable and scalable load-balancing software that offers great technical support

My company is really happy with Kemp LoadMaster as a product. My company is also happy with the support we receive from Kemp LoadMaster. I want Kemp LoadMaster to provide users with better reporting capabilities in relation to TCP packets. In general, the connections that are present in the system require improvement. Feature-wise, Kemp LoadMaster has everything that our company's customers require. Kemp LoadMaster also has features that have supported our company's past projects.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The Global Server Load Balancing (GSLB) is simple to use."

"Compared to F5, which I used about six years ago, the A10 is much easier when routing. You don't have to use the wildcard bits to route it between the different segments. It's much less troublesome to configure."

"The ADCs are pretty straightforward and easy to use. There is a GUI base where you can go in and see everything, but they also have a CLI base where you can use a command and get the information that you want, very fast."

"We do have the option of creating virtual chassis, so that gives it a bit more security. If we find an application which is not going to play well in the main pool, we can easily create a virtual chassis and have that application in that virtual chassis. With the virtual chassis we can also create system partitions and have a test system for test applications, and have the others elsewhere."

"It's a very friendly solution, easy to configure and it's very flexible."

"The solution is stable."

"Feature-wise, A10 Networks Thunder ADC is better for troubleshooting...Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten."

"We can control access based on the specific application. If other devices are attempting to directly access the servers, you can block them. Additionally, you can balance the load among servers to optimize performance. For example, utilizing caching can make the application run faster."

More A10 Networks Thunder ADC pros

"LoadMaster is easy to deploy and understand."

"Mitigates content security policy issues."

"With Kemp 360 Central, our customers get a nice overview of their Kemp products and an easy way to upgrade firmware on all devices from a single interface."

"The user interface is very easy to work with."

"The configuration is really easy and the web portal is self-explanatory."

"Edge Security Pack is valuable because of the way it separates between critical infrastructure and the public internet."

"Failover is seamless and our services are rock solid."

"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...I rate the technical support a ten out of ten...The initial setup of Kemp LoadMaster is very simple."

More Kemp LoadMaster pros

Cons

"The solution should add automation features in the next release."

"There is room for improvement in the upgrading process. Sometimes we have to contact A10 for verification of some stuff."

"When it comes to support, there is always room for improvement. First call resolution is not always there for urgent issues. The first call resolution is something that could be improved upon."

"The costs can be quite high."

"There is room for improvement in the GUI. I just migrated from the 2.7 software train to the 4.1, and there are still people on 2.7. The latter is a very old GUI if you compare it to F5. It's not as easy to use and a lot of things are missing. They've made a lot of improvements in the 4.1 step, but compared to the ease of use of F5, it's still quite difficult. For people who haven't got a lot of experience, the GUI can be quite challenging."

"The solution does logging, but the logging capacity is really small. Because we have a bunch of traffic here, we usually get a logging-side warning that "This many logs were lost because of the heavy traffic." If the logging was better, that would be very good."

"A graphical dashboard for analyzing performance is needed."

"Currently, the solution's WAF features are fewer. They should consider increasing their WAF features."

More A10 Networks Thunder ADC cons

"When we go serverless, we may again have to revisit this because the configuration needs to be changed. With this change, we can run into a lot of other configurations that we haven't got into, which involve additional expenses. It would be challenging to convince management to buy at that price point. It would be a balancing act of justifying that expense and the value, that is, how it is going to save a bit of time and make our platform secure. It can have better configuration ability. A lot of iterations happen when we have multiple servers pointing to the same domain. If we do not orchestrate carefully, it gets into a loop, which takes away the precious time of the user who is trying to subscribe to a service. It takes a little longer time to realize services as well as web pages."

"I would like to see more automation and control of overactive and inactive resources. If I could schedule these around our updates then it would be all automated. I would like to set up an automated script to coincide with the scripts I use to update resources and servers."

"The only thing I have struggled with is setting up automatic backups."

"The GUI is rather technical and complex, so it could be improved by making it simpler and more user-friendly."

"There is room for improvement in the stability of the solution."

"If there is anything that needs to be updated, the GUI can get a refresh to make it look more like 2020, although it is just a cosmetic change."

"Overall, the Kemp LoadMaster has been an all-rounder great product and stable. The free trial and virtual edition make it a breeze for any potential customer to give it a spin before actually deciding to put it on the infrastructure or even talk to the CFO."

"Although Kemp is very user-friendly, it lacks a more custom configuration."

More Kemp LoadMaster cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"For the hardware and license, we paid $35,000 per box, which was a one-time cost. Then, for the Gold Support on the two boxes, we pay $9400 annually."

"The pricing is fine, considering the features they are providing. If you are an individual user, they'll price the product differently compared to how they price the product that is sold to an organization."

"The solution costs less than its competitors."

"One of the main reasons for switching away from Cisco was the licensing model. A10 gives you global server load balancing for free, while Cisco charged a significant licensing fee for that."

"It is $7000 per unit for the support annually."

"There were budgetary constraints that keep us from investing in the single pane of glass traffic management feature. We saw a demo of this feature about a year to a year and a half ago."

"The price is good they are very comparative."

"As for the initial investment in the hardware, F5 and A10 are quite similar now. For the current A10 solution, the initial cost was about $36,000. As for annual support, the F5 solution would be between $10,000 and $12,000, while the A10 is $2,200 a year for support."

More A10 Networks Thunder ADC pricing and cost advice

"The product definitely provides what the organization needs and its cost is reasonable considering the value it brings."

"Less expensive than Citrix."

"Licensing is yearly and I am going to guess that it is CAN $2000.00."

"The setup cost and pricing plan is reasonable and will ultimately give you a worthy return."

"This is a cost-efficient product."

"The price is lower than other options."

"Download Kemp's VLM trial and take it for a test drive; you will be impressed."

"The Kemp LoadMaster is a tremendous value."

More Kemp LoadMaster pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

21%

Financial Services Firm

12%

University

Government

Educational Organization

65%

Computer Software Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Which is the best DDoS protection solution for a big ISP for monitoring and mitigating?

I would recommend A10 Networks due that it delivers high performance in a small form factor to reduce OPEX with significantly lower power usage, rack space, and cooling requirements compared to oth...

See all answers

Do you recommend A10 Networks Thunder ADC?

I do recommend A10 Networks Thunder ADC. It's very user-friendly, easy to configure, and flexible. It is a very useful solution - especially now, when a lot of employees are working remotely. I hav...

See all answers

What do you like most about A10 Networks Thunder ADC?

A10 Networks Thunder ADC is an easy-to-use and flexible solution.

See all answers

What do you like most about Kemp LoadMaster?

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...I rate the technical support a ten out of ten...The initial setup of Kemp LoadMaster is very simple.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kemp LoadMaster?

LoadMaster is cheaper than some other solutions. It has a perpetual license, so it's a one-time cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kemp LoadMaster?

There are some challenges with updates on certain models that don't have a few features. The support team often takes a lot of time to provide resolutions for issues. Also, I could see more capabil...

See all answers

Comparisons

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs A10 Networks Thunder ADC

Compared 23% of the time

NetScaler vs A10 Networks Thunder ADC

Compared 16% of the time

Fortinet FortiADC vs A10 Networks Thunder ADC

Compared 14% of the time

Radware Alteon vs A10 Networks Thunder ADC

Compared 9% of the time

NGINX Plus vs A10 Networks Thunder ADC

Compared 7% of the time

More A10 Networks Thunder ADC Competitors

HAProxy vs Kemp LoadMaster

Compared 22% of the time

NGINX Plus vs Kemp LoadMaster

Compared 21% of the time

Fortinet FortiADC vs Kemp LoadMaster

Compared 15% of the time

NetScaler vs Kemp LoadMaster

Compared 9% of the time

Barracuda Web Application Firewall vs Kemp LoadMaster

Compared 5% of the time

More Kemp LoadMaster Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

A10 Networks Thunder ADC

January 2025

Download A10 Networks Thunder ADC product report

Buyer's Guide

Kemp LoadMaster

January 2025

Download Kemp LoadMaster product report

Also Known As

Thunder ADC, AX Series

LoadMaster Load Balancer

Learn More

A10 Networks

Progress Software

Overview

A10 Networks Thunder ADC is a dynamic application delivery controller and advanced load balancer. Thunder ADC is a value-added solution provided by A10 Networks specializing in robust, trusted, scalable application services for cloud, hybrid, edge cloud, and on-premise environments focused on improving business processes and keeping infrastructures safe. The solution consistently provides server availability, improves content delivery, and protects at-risk applications. A10 Networks Thunder ADC easily controls hybrid and multi-cloud deployments using a Polynimbus strategy to minimize difficulties and costs for IT processes, facilitating overall improved business results.

A10 Networks Thunder ADC is effective for small to medium businesses (SMBs) to large enterprises. Service providers and cloud operators are all using A10 Network ADC to manage their large and fast-growing group of business-critical applications.

A10 Networks Thunder ADC supplies L4-7 load balancing with numerous layers of security using DNS and web app firewalls, comprehensive support for advanced encryption, single sign-on (SSO) authentication, and high-performance Perfect Forward Secrecy and Error Correction Code (PFS/ECC). Thunder ADC is designed upon A10 Networks Advanced Core Operating System (ACOS®) platform to provide consistent, efficient application performance and trusted security for any environment.

A10 Networks Thunder ADC Benefits

Consistently accessible: A10 Networks Thunder ADC employs numerous load balancing protocols to evenly distribute workloads to all servers and works to ensure constant application functionality. User requests are monitored to ensure loads are directed to the appropriate server so that there is always a proper response delivery to content. This process ensures the applications are consistently available.
Global Server Load Balancing (GSLB): To ensure business processes are fully optimized at all times, A10 Networks Thunder ADC employs a dynamic Global Server Load Balancing (GSLB) process to augment server load balancing capabilities throughout global data centers for high availability and improved user experience and application tolerance.
Fast content delivery: A10 Networks Thunder ADC conquers the general WAN latencies, chatty policies, and redundant software programs to ensure quick and responsive service. Employees receive a fast, excellent end-user experience while the organization's business leaders get exceeded SLA mandates and increased productivity with teams working remotely and a step up on the competition.

A10 Networks Thunder ADC Features

Detailed Analytics: When deployed with A10 Networks Harmony Controller, Thunder ADC delivers a large selection of detailed aggregate and per-request reports in real time. The reports include popular URLs, error and health indicators, latencies, and end-to-end response times. The data is further dissected to deliver per-app reporting, availability alerts, and performance.
API Coverage: Thunder ADC utilizes A10 Networks REST-based aXAPIs to structure all features with 100 percent API coverage. The resulting interface is then used to seamlessly integrate custom or third-party management solutions, such as VMware or other SDN platforms, OpenStack, Microsoft SCVMM, or other cloud orchestration systems. There are also software plug-ins available for private clouds utilizing VMware’s vRealize Orchestrator.
Comprehensive Management Controls: Thunder ADC is fully supported by A10 Networks Harmony Controller and can be deployed in software or as a software-as-a-service (SaaS). This controller functions as a native management platform that organizes and distributes application-centric service protocols and configuration data to numerous Thunder appliances and device cluster infrastructures throughout numerous multi-cloud environments. Users can instantly identify, audit and track every appliance using critical operational metrics, such as CPU, disk usage, device partitions, and end users. The A10 Networks Harmony Controller will also complete configuration backups and restore operations, and will schedule regular software upgrades.

Kemp LoadMaster is a powerful load balancing solution that also serves as a web application firewall. Its primary use case is load balancing and application load balancing, making it an ideal solution for organizations that must distribute traffic across multiple servers. Kemp's integration with an active directory for ESP usage, hosting/deployment of SSL certificates, and pricing are some of its most valuable features.

Using Kemp has helped organizations mitigate cross-scripting vulnerabilities, cookie-related issues, and content security policy issues. It has also allowed them to handle everything with Kemp instead of working on each application individually.

Sample Customers

123inkt.nl, Bentley University, Box, Brainshark, Buienradar, Capgemini, CGN/LSN & NAT64, Chengdu Telecom, Club One, Code Ready, CRC Health Group, Cyso, Deutsche Telekom, Earth Class Mail, Excite, FFF Enterprises, Florence County, Framingham State University, From30

Kent County Council, KEMP, SMA Solar Technology AG, RT Player , Victrix (Quebec, Canada), Texas A&M, Macmillan Cancer Support, Cisco, Austin Bank

Buyer's Guide

A10 Networks Thunder ADC vs. Kemp LoadMaster

January 2025

Free Report: A10 Networks Thunder ADC vs. Kemp LoadMaster

Find out what your peers are saying about A10 Networks Thunder ADC vs. Kemp LoadMaster and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our A10 Networks Thunder ADC vs. Kemp LoadMaster report.

See our list of best Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) vendors.

We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.