Top 10 Kemp LoadMaster Alternatives

4.7 out of 5

49 reviews
98% willing to recommend

1,058 followers

Top Kemp LoadMaster Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Kemp LoadMaster based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), and HAProxy. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Progress Software Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Progress Software, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

3.6 out of 5

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

3.6 out of 5

Kemp LoadMaster is favored for cost-effectiveness and ease of setup in diverse environments. In comparison, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway attracts with advanced features and seamless Azure integration at a higher price. Each solution caters to specific needs, influencing tech buyers' choices.

Download Kemp LoadMaster vs. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Report

Pricing

Kemp LoadMaster offers lower setup costs, making it budget-friendly, while Microsoft Azure Application Gateway incurs higher initial expenses, reflecting its comprehensive infrastructure and feature set.

View comparison

Pricing

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)

4.1 out of 5

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)

4.1 out of 5

F5 BIG-IP LTM offers advanced traffic management with comprehensive features like iRules and iApps, suitable for complex environments. In comparison, Kemp LoadMaster is cost-effective with ease of use and effective security for straightforward needs but lacks some advanced functionalities of F5.

Download F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs. Kemp LoadMaster Report

Pricing

The setup cost for F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is typically higher, reflecting its advanced features, while Kemp LoadMaster is known for a lower initial outlay, making it a more economical choice.

View comparison

Pricing

HAProxy

4.1 out of 5

HAProxy

4.1 out of 5

HAProxy is considered by many in the industry to be one of the fastest and most popular and trusted software load balancer products in the marketplace today. Organizations are able to immediately deploy HAProxy solutions to enable websites and applications to optimize performance, security, and observability. HAProxy solutions are available to scale to any environment.

Download HAProxy vs. Kemp LoadMaster Report

Pricing

HAProxy is free software. There are optional paid products (support/appliances).

I think that the pricing is very fair, I would definitely recommend buying the Enterprise license.

View comparison

Pricing

HAProxy is free software. There are optional paid products (support/appliances).

I think that the pricing is very fair, I would definitely recommend buying the Enterprise license.

NetScaler

4.2 out of 5

NetScaler

4.2 out of 5

Kemp LoadMaster is favored for its ease and pricing, ideal for SMBs needing geo-redundancy and Microsoft integration. In comparison, NetScaler suits enterprises needing comprehensive load balancing and security features, despite being complex, offering strong monitoring and high-demand adaptability.

Download Kemp LoadMaster vs. NetScaler Report

Pricing

Kemp LoadMaster offers competitive setup costs, while NetScaler's initial investment may be higher but includes comprehensive features, highlighting distinct value propositions for businesses with varying financial priorities.

View comparison

Pricing

NGINX Plus

4.4 out of 5

NGINX Plus

4.4 out of 5

Kemp LoadMaster provides seamless deployment with pre-configured Microsoft templates and strong security for Azure environments. In comparison, NGINX Plus excels in enterprise integration and robust load balancing across web applications, offering efficient traffic management and versatile protocol support.

Download Kemp LoadMaster vs. NGINX Plus Report

Pricing

Kemp LoadMaster offers a straightforward setup with affordable costs, while NGINX Plus involves a higher initial setup investment, highlighting a key cost difference between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Kemp LoadMaster offers a straightforward setup with affordable costs, while NGINX Plus involves a higher initial setup investment, highlighting a key cost difference between the two solutions.

Fortinet FortiADC

3.9 out of 5

Fortinet FortiADC

3.9 out of 5

Kemp LoadMaster is recognized for its user-friendly deployment with tailored templates for Microsoft applications, simplifying integration and configuration. In comparison, Fortinet FortiADC offers robust features with a focus on security and flexibility, appealing to buyers needing comprehensive traffic management solutions.

Download Fortinet FortiADC vs. Kemp LoadMaster Report

Pricing

Kemp LoadMaster users report lower setup costs, while Fortinet FortiADC setup can be pricier, reflecting a more significant initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Kemp LoadMaster users report lower setup costs, while Fortinet FortiADC setup can be pricier, reflecting a more significant initial investment.

Radware Alteon

4.2 out of 5

Radware Alteon

4.2 out of 5

Radware Alteon offers robust application delivery with SSL-TLS acceleration and security features, appealing to those prioritizing high availability and integration. In comparison, Kemp LoadMaster attracts buyers seeking affordability and ease of deployment with comprehensive load balancing and security features.

Download Kemp LoadMaster vs. Radware Alteon Report

Pricing

Radware Alteon incurs higher setup costs than Kemp LoadMaster, which offers a more budget-friendly option. While Kemp LoadMaster provides cost-effective solutions, Radware Alteon may appeal to those seeking premium features.

View comparison

Pricing

A10 Networks Thunder ADC

4.2 out of 5

A10 Networks Thunder ADC

4.2 out of 5

A10 Networks Thunder ADC offers advanced features like scripting and DDoS mitigation for complex scenarios. In comparison, Kemp LoadMaster provides affordability and ease of use, appealing to tech buyers needing basic load balancing and virtualization support while minimizing integration complexities.

Download A10 Networks Thunder ADC vs. Kemp LoadMaster Report

Pricing

A10 Networks Thunder ADC has a higher setup cost compared to Kemp LoadMaster, making Kemp's solution more budget-friendly. A10 Networks' features may justify the added expense for users seeking robust capabilities.

View comparison

Pricing

VMWare Avi Load Balancer

4.1 out of 5

VMWare Avi Load Balancer

4.1 out of 5

Kemp LoadMaster offers cost-effective pricing and ease of use with configuration templates and geo-redundancy. In comparison, VMware Avi Load Balancer provides comprehensive features and flexibility with robust analytics and API security, making it suitable for environments needing advanced capabilities.

Download Kemp LoadMaster vs. VMWare Avi Load Balancer Report

Pricing

Kemp LoadMaster offers straightforward setup costs, while VMWare Avi Load Balancer has a more complex pricing structure.

View comparison

Pricing

Kemp LoadMaster offers straightforward setup costs, while VMWare Avi Load Balancer has a more complex pricing structure.

Loadbalancer.org

4.4 out of 5

Loadbalancer.org

4.4 out of 5

Kemp LoadMaster appeals to organizations prioritizing ease and affordability through features like geo-redundancy and Azure integration. In comparison, Loadbalancer.org, valued for its open-source flexibility, attracts larger enterprises with its scalability. Kemp LoadMaster's user-friendly setup contrasts with Loadbalancer.org's advanced, technical configurations.

Download Kemp LoadMaster vs. Loadbalancer.org Report

Pricing

Kemp LoadMaster's setup cost is competitive but can be higher for advanced features, while Loadbalancer.org offers a more straightforward pricing structure, making it potentially more cost-effective for organizations seeking essential load balancing capabilities without additional expen...

View comparison

Pricing

Show 2 more products

Related categories

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Service Mesh