Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Pros & Cons summary

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

Kemp LoadMaster is praised for its simple and efficient installation and deployment process, which is well-documented.
The load balancing features, including support for multiple SSLs, are considered core and valuable to its functionality.
Security features such as Intrusion Prevention and Web Application Firewall receive high praise for their effectiveness in protecting critical infrastructure.
Kemp LoadMaster allows seamless management and maintenance by providing tools like Kemp 360 Central for easy firmware upgrades and an overview of all devices.
High availability options, effective failover capabilities, and scalability are major advantages that contribute to its reputation for reliability.

CONS

Some documentation is outdated and assumes familiarity with the product.
Logging requires enabling ESP, which necessitates defining allowed IP addresses, creating inconvenience.
Certificate installation is complex and requires modernization, particularly for monitoring expiration and issues.
Lack of a well-supported SCOM Management Pack and sufficient knowledge base resources makes information hard to find.
Network License Bonds (NLB) face issues in virtual environments due to licensing being coupled with the device's MAC address.
 

Kemp LoadMaster Pros review quotes

it_user426051 - PeerSpot reviewer
Chief Consuntant/KEMP VIP at a tech consulting company with 11-50 employees
Jul 29, 2017
​Simple to install with good documentation.
AC
CEO | Owner at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
Dec 1, 2017
We needed a Microsoft Threat Management Gateway server replacement solution for a customer and were impressed with the simplified deployment of the Kemp LoadMasters.
it_user806598 - PeerSpot reviewer
Consultant
Jan 23, 2018
There is a simplicity to the setup and configuration.
Learn what your peers think about Kemp LoadMaster. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2025.
879,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.
it_user848262 - PeerSpot reviewer
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Solution Architect at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Apr 1, 2018
Edge Security Pack is valuable because of the way it separates between critical infrastructure and the public internet.
JK
Infrastructure Specialist at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Jun 13, 2018
With Kemp 360 Central, our customers get a nice overview of their Kemp products and an easy way to upgrade firmware on all devices from a single interface.
it_user1069098 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Consultant at Base It
Oct 24, 2019
The security features are the most valuable features of this solution.
MB
Senior Systems Engineer at a real estate/law firm with 501-1,000 employees
Oct 30, 2019
We really like the performance of this solution.
reviewer1261467 - PeerSpot reviewer
Network Administrator at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees
Feb 12, 2020
I like the way this solution handles multiple SSLs in different domains while still load balancing.
reviewer1373811 - PeerSpot reviewer
Consultant at DXC
Jun 23, 2020
The base feature of Kemp LoadMaster load balancing ticks all the boxes but the most valuable features would be the security features Intrusion Prevention (IPS) and Web Application Firewall (WAF).
reviewer1374081 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Aug 4, 2020
The most valuable feature that I found is the load balancing feature, it is the core function of the product.
 

Kemp LoadMaster Cons review quotes

it_user426051 - PeerSpot reviewer
Chief Consuntant/KEMP VIP at a tech consulting company with 11-50 employees
Jul 29, 2017
Some documentation is out of date versus the new version, and things have been moved​.
AC
CEO | Owner at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
Dec 1, 2017
Some of the support documentation seems to make assumptions that the person installing or configuring is experienced with the product or concepts.
it_user806598 - PeerSpot reviewer
Consultant
Jan 23, 2018
SNMP and/or RESTCONF management, in order to collect many counters, for plotting in a central application need to be improved.
Learn what your peers think about Kemp LoadMaster. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2025.
879,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.
it_user848262 - PeerSpot reviewer
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Solution Architect at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Apr 1, 2018
They need to improve the UI environment. Currently, it's hard to navigate and use product.
JK
Infrastructure Specialist at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Jun 13, 2018
The auth website of ESP is really lacking. It’s not responsive (mobile friendly) and the procedure of changing the website is difficult. We tend to avoid using pre-auth for that reason.
it_user1069098 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Consultant at Base It
Oct 24, 2019
To make it a perfect ten out of ten it would need better connection logging. If there is an active connection, that there is better logging. It should also have better management monitoring tools.
MB
Senior Systems Engineer at a real estate/law firm with 501-1,000 employees
Oct 30, 2019
The GUI is rather technical and complex, so it could be improved by making it simpler and more user-friendly.
reviewer1261467 - PeerSpot reviewer
Network Administrator at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees
Feb 12, 2020
Although Kemp is very user-friendly, it lacks a more custom configuration.
reviewer1373811 - PeerSpot reviewer
Consultant at DXC
Jun 23, 2020
Overall, the Kemp LoadMaster has been an all-rounder great product and stable. The free trial and virtual edition make it a breeze for any potential customer to give it a spin before actually deciding to put it on the infrastructure or even talk to the CFO.
reviewer1374081 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Aug 4, 2020
Third, the password history restriction needs improvement. For example, the password policy will restrict the user to always use a unique password combination. The password should not be reused for a minimum of three generations of passwords.