VMWare Avi Load Balancer and Microsoft Azure Application Gateway are two leading products in the load balancing arena. VMWare Avi Load Balancer seems to have the upper hand in flexibility and analytics, while Microsoft Azure Application Gateway stands out for ease of use and integration with Azure cloud infrastructures.
Features: VMWare Avi Load Balancer is notable for its unique deployment capabilities and centralized control plane for service engines. It provides comprehensive visibility and flexible configurations across different platforms, along with strong API and application debugging tools. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway offers ease of use and robust security through its WAF capabilities. It provides flexible traffic management and supports various integrations, enhancing adaptability.
Room for Improvement: VMWare Avi Load Balancer could benefit from better integration with hyperscale environments and improved documentation. Bundling essential features into a single package instead of separate modules could also enhance its attractiveness. For Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, improvements in scalability and configuration ease, along with enhanced security features, would be valuable. Users have also cited integration issues and suggested better documentation and cost efficiency.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: VMWare Avi Load Balancer excels in deployment across on-premises and hybrid environments and is praised for its adaptable deployments. While its technical support is efficient, user interaction with the support team is limited. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway focuses on public and hybrid cloud deployment, showcasing strength in public cloud operations. Its customer service is generally well-received, although some users report limited support interaction, similar to Avi.
Pricing and ROI: VMWare Avi Load Balancer offers a competitive pricing model appreciated for its cost-effectiveness and flexible licensing options, leading to quick ROI according to users. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is considered relatively expensive due to its complex pay-as-you-go model, yet it offers value for integrated Azure cloud services. While its costs are higher, users acknowledge the product's affordability in comparison to other complex solutions, though feedback on ROI varies based on specific use cases and strategies.
Azure Application Gateway is a web traffic load balancer that enables you to manage traffic to your web applications. Traditional load balancers operate at the transport layer (OSI layer 4 - TCP and UDP) and route traffic based on source IP address and port, to a destination IP address and port.
To learn more about our solution, ask questions, and share feedback, join our Microsoft Security, Compliance and Identity Community.
Avi Networks Software Load Balancer is an application delivery controller (ADC) platform. The solution provides scalable application delivery across any infrastructure and allows your organization to deliver multi-cloud application services, such as load balancing, autoscaling, application security, container networking, and web application firewall. It is designed with 100% software load balancing to ensure a fast and secure application experience. Additionally, Avi Networks Software Load Balancer offers elasticity and delivers intelligence across any environment.
The Avi Networks Software Load Balancer is unique because
Avi Networks Software Load Balancer Product Highlights
Avi Networks Software Load Balancer Features
Avi Networks Software Load Balancer has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:
Avi Networks Software Load Balancer Benefits
There are many benefits to implementing Avi Networks Software Load Balancer. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:
We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
