Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
4.9
F5 BIG-IP LTM is costly but valued for performance, with pricing options and potential discounts, especially on AWS Marketplace.
Sentiment score
7.0
VMWare Avi Load Balancer offers flexible, competitive pricing with options based on bandwidth or CPU, and licensing transferability.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.2
F5 BIG-IP LTM provides flexible load balancing, SSL offloading, and security integration for efficient traffic management and improved uptime.
Sentiment score
8.4
VMWare Avi Load Balancer provides robust load balancing, integration, scalability, and functionalities, enhancing network infrastructure and management.
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.6
VMWare Avi Load Balancer's support is highly rated for efficiency and personalized service, despite varied ticket volumes.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
4.0
VMWare Avi Load Balancer has pricing, documentation, integration, and security challenges, requiring improved setup, analytics, and sales practices.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.5
VMWare Avi Load Balancer offers scalable architecture, supports many applications, but encounters challenges with infrastructure and scalability in specific environments.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.8
VMWare Avi Load Balancer is praised for its stability, though some note inconsistencies under heavy traffic conditions.
 

Categories and Ranking

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Man...
Ranking in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
120
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
VMWare Avi Load Balancer
Ranking in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
11th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category, the mindshare of F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is 15.1%, down from 16.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMWare Avi Load Balancer is 3.9%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
 

Featured Reviews

Richard Polyak - PeerSpot reviewer
Reduces maintenance downtime and has a strong user community
The advice I would give to others who are looking to implement F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager is this: look at their user knowledge base first to see if the solution truly fits what you need. On a scale of one to 10, I would give F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager a nine.
Richard Polyak - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to set up and has good integration into the host environment but needs better third party integration
I'm not sure which version number we are on. It's one of the latest, I assume. We don't run the latest. We usually are either one or two versions behind. It is something we are exploring. We do have use cases and it will compete against our existing product line. That would have to go in the second half of this year. Right now, it's more of a comparison of how we use it right now. We don't use it really in production. We are going to definitely explore it and do our comparison and more in-depth analysis of the product and compare it against our existing product line. I'd advise potential users to do a very in-depth analysis of the products in comparison. And don't just look at the cover of it - really look into the detailed backend support infrastructure and if it can be implemented the way you need it to be. I'd rate the solution five out of ten. It's not a fully mature product.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions are best for your needs.
823,795 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
14%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
22%
Computer Software Company
14%
Government
10%
University
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with F5 BIG-IP?
There are no specific areas for improvement as it is already well-resolved and doesn't require further enhancements.
What is your primary use case for F5 BIG-IP?
The primary use case includes load balancing to serve application servers and basic web application firewall solutions. Our customers use it for that purpose.
What do you like most about Avi Networks Software Load Balancer?
The solution has simplified our network infrastructure management.
What needs improvement with Avi Networks Software Load Balancer?
The network analytics and monitoring features are not effective. The product does not provide deep troubleshooting features. The solution must provide public IP features. F5 provides such features.
 

Also Known As

F5 BIG-IP, BIG-IP LTM, F5 ASM, Viprion, F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition , Crescendo Networks Application Delivery Controller, BIG IP
Avi Software Load Balancer
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Riken, TransUnion, Tepco Systems Administration, Daejeon University, G&T Bank, Danamon, CyberAgent Inc.
Palo Alto Networks, DGDean, Swisslos
Find out what your peers are saying about F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs. VMWare Avi Load Balancer and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
823,795 professionals have used our research since 2012.