Microsoft Azure Application Gateway and Amazon Elastic Load Balancing are competitive cloud-based load balancing services. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway appears to have an advantage in pricing and customer service, while Amazon Elastic Load Balancing is stronger in features and integration capabilities.
Features: Microsoft Azure Application Gateway provides URL-based routing, SSL termination, and Web Application Firewall, focusing on application layer functionalities. Amazon Elastic Load Balancing offers automatic scaling, AWS service integration, and layer 4 capabilities, providing versatility across network layers.
Room for Improvement: Microsoft Azure Application Gateway could enhance its feature diversification and integration capabilities with third-party services. Its setup process might also benefit from simplification. User interface improvements are also an area to explore. Amazon Elastic Load Balancing could improve customer support responsiveness, reduce documentation complexity for novice users, and introduce more application layer features to match competitive offerings.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon Elastic Load Balancing is noted for its straightforward deployment and seamless integration with AWS environments, complemented by comprehensive documentation. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway also provides an excellent deployment experience, with superior customer support adding significant value to long-term operations.
Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Azure Application Gateway generally offers more affordable setup costs and quicker ROI for businesses focused on application-heavy workloads, emphasizing cost efficiency. Amazon Elastic Load Balancing, while potentially higher in initial cost, offers a robust ROI through its comprehensive feature set and scalability, justifying the investment for extensive operational scenarios.
Elastic Load Balancing is a part of a total solution package.
We have seen a return on investment in terms of time-saving and cost-saving by not creating our own infrastructure.
The support team has architects available.
The technical support is very responsive due to the prime-level support package.
There is room for improvement, specifically in paid support, by providing more direct contact.
Managing traffic load is efficient as Auto Scaling Group can easily be connected with ALB based on the number of requests.
The ability to directly block specific IP addresses without additional service integration would be beneficial.
There is room for improvement in terms of support, such as assigning agents directly for more straightforward engagement.
Pricing is okay, and Amazon has plans to reduce prices further.
Using ALB incurs a cost as opposed to the free open-source solutions like NGINX or HAProxy.
Azure solutions are quite expensive.
Deploy our solution in multiple availability zones, it ensures that the system is always available and does not go down.
It is the de facto standard for AWS workloads and supports the AWS ecosystem seamlessly.
We are using it for some of the security features for our applications, particularly for securing traffic in transit with SSL.
Elastic Load Balancing automatically distributes incoming application traffic across multiple targets, such as Amazon EC2 instances, containers, IP addresses, and Lambda functions. It can handle the varying load of your application traffic in a single Availability Zone or across multiple Availability Zones. Elastic Load Balancing offers three types of load balancers that all feature the high availability, automatic scaling, and robust security necessary to make your applications fault tolerant.
Azure Application Gateway is a web traffic load balancer that enables you to manage traffic to your web applications. Traditional load balancers operate at the transport layer (OSI layer 4 - TCP and UDP) and route traffic based on source IP address and port, to a destination IP address and port.
To learn more about our solution, ask questions, and share feedback, join our Microsoft Security, Compliance and Identity Community.
We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
