I have two primary use cases, one for a bank and the other one for an operator. I will speak about the bank case. The environment is very critical: securing an e-banking server and SMS banking.
Network & Security Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Give us visibility into server connections/sessions, real-time alerts, KPIs
Pros and Cons
- "This product gives us visibility into what is going on in two servers, including connections and sessions, real-time alerts, very good reporting, and KPIs. It makes managing security of a critical server very easy, with a friendly GUI."
- "There is no one special feature, but the WAF itself is valuable: user-friendly protection against web attacks etc., authentication, reporting, accountability, alerting, and hardened OS."
- "This product could easily progress to be among the industry leaders. I think they need to improve enterprise level automation. It integrates with a small number of vulnerability scanners, so report results should be imported manually; same for SIEM integration."
What is our primary use case?
How has it helped my organization?
This product gives us visibility into what is going on in two servers, including connections and sessions, real-time alerts, very good reporting, and KPIs.
It makes managing security of a critical server very easy with a friendly GUI.
What is most valuable?
There is no one special feature, but the WAF itself is valuable: user-friendly protection against web attacks etc., authentication, reporting, accountability, alerting, and hardened OS.
What needs improvement?
This product could easily progress to be among the industry leaders. I think they need to improve enterprise level automation. It integrates with a small number of vulnerability scanners, so report results should be imported manually; same for SIEM integration.
Buyer's Guide
Barracuda Web Application Firewall
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about Barracuda Web Application Firewall. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
For how long have I used the solution?
More than five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Very stable product.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
No issues with scalability.
How are customer service and support?
Best support I have ever seen. I have experience with several products and their support. Barracuda support is very special: efficient, quick replies.
How was the initial setup?
There was some complexity because it requires special configuration in addition to some network changes.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Very good price compared to other products. Some products, like Fortinet, give you good performance as well, and their price is probably lower than Barracuda, but you should pay attention to renewal prices and options. The BWAF license includes everything, even cloud control, which requires a license in other products.
OPEX/CAPEX should be looked at closely.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Fortinet, but BWAF was much better.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate it a 10 out of 10 because all requirements from a product are there: very good performance, robust equipment, pentest/vul scan success, very good support. The cost to value ratio is tops.
If you have a limited budget it’s the best, and if you have an open budget why spend more since BWAF can do the job.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Presales Solutions Architect at Hilal Computers
Good technical support and security features but needs better documentation
Pros and Cons
- "The solution offers multiple security features. There are machine learning features and great URL encryption. It also offers multi-protocol support against DDoS attacks."
- "The documentation is lacking. It's not like what you'd get if you were using Juniper or Cisco. They need to expand on it and make it more useful."
What is our primary use case?
We primarily use the solution to secure most data centers. We also use it for mobile apps for malicious automated attacks.
What is most valuable?
The solution offers multiple security features. There are machine learning features and great URL encryption. It also offers multi-protocol support against DDoS attacks.
The API security they offer is quite good.
The technical support on offer is very good.
There's multiple application delivery which is impressive.
What needs improvement?
The deployment isn't very user-friendly.
There are a lot of up and coming competitors in the space, and there's always new technology coming out. The solution needs to make sure that it keeps up with what's going on in the industry to make sure they don't get left behind.
The documentation is lacking. It's not like what you'd get if you were using Juniper or Cisco. They need to expand on it and make it more useful.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using the solution for almost four and a half years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability of the solution is good. It's pretty reliable. There aren't bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's good.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability has been fine. It's been quite good for us. We don't have complaints in that regard.
How are customer service and technical support?
We've always been pretty happy with technical support. We find them helpful and knowledgable.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I also work with Fortinet solutions and I find that sometimes they can be limiting and have their own set of difficulties.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is okay, however, it's not particularly user-friendly. I wouldn't describe it as complex. It's more difficult.
What about the implementation team?
We are system integrators. We can handle implementations.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The pricing is okay. Unlike other competitors, you are able to negotiate a little bit, which can help drive down the cost to the company.
What other advice do I have?
We're a solution partner, an integrator. We have partnership-level agreements with the solution.
We have multiple deployment models. We use it on-premises as well as on the cloud using both Amazon Web Services and Azure.
Overall, I'd rate the solution seven out of ten. It would be hard for any product to rate a ten out of ten for me. However, to get a bit of a higher mark, it should offer better documentation and be more user-friendly, particularly where deployment is concerned. I'd still recommend Barracuda, though. It's pretty solid.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Integrator
Buyer's Guide
Barracuda Web Application Firewall
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about Barracuda Web Application Firewall. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Senior Operations Manager at samergl
A stable solution with a straightforward setup and continual updates
Pros and Cons
- "I find the solution very stable."
- "The solution could use more reports."
What is our primary use case?
We primarily use this solution for firewalls.
What is most valuable?
The features are all fine. We just fixed some bugs from three months ago, and we're waiting now for a final review. They sent us some features to fix the issue.
What needs improvement?
The solution could use more reports.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using the solution for 6 months.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I find the solution very stable.
How are customer service and technical support?
Technical support has been good. Currently, we don't have any issues.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
This is the first solution we are using.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was very straightforward. We applied what we needed to use and added different features. Each time we need to use a different feature, we go through configuring it and including more features as necessary.
What about the implementation team?
I used my own team for the implementation.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We did not evaluate other options before choosing this solution.
What other advice do I have?
I manage and operate the device. We are working with the operation team each time applying manual updates, which is continuous. I'd like to see different information, to help handle issues in an easier way.
I would rate the solution a 9 out of 10.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Assistant to the General Manager at a tech services company with self employed
Attacks have stopped and all of the traffic is going smoothly to my servers
Pros and Cons
- "The volumetric DDoS defense is very good because I had a problem with a lot of volumetric DDoS attacks on my servers. After using Barracuda, those attacks have stopped and all the traffic is going smoothly to my servers and the system is working really well."
- "I would like to see better controlling of the traffic."
What is our primary use case?
The primary use case is to protect from DDoS attacks and to protect my backend servers. That was the main concern for me. Barracuda has been very good. I'm very happy with the product.
How has it helped my organization?
Previously, attacks would make the systems go down and we couldn't connect with our customers and other things. We need our servers to be online 24-7 which is why I chose Barracuda. Now our servers are running smoothly and I have no problem running my servers.
What is most valuable?
The volumetric DDoS defense is very good because I had a problem with a lot of volumetric DDoS attacks on my servers. After using Barracuda, those attacks have stopped, all of the traffic is going smoothly to my servers and the system is working really well.
What needs improvement?
I would like to see better controlling of the traffic.
For how long have I used the solution?
Less than one year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability is very good. I would give it four and a half stars out of five.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was straightforward. It was easy to deploy. It took six to seven hours of work a day to deploy every policy that I wanted. The initial setup went well, there weren't any issues with it.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate it a nine out of ten. The attacks that we used to get on servers are gone. My servers are now running 24-7 and I have no problems with them.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Especialista en Informática at a maritime company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Protects our applications and has good support
Pros and Cons
- "We use Barracuda to protect the application. That's the main feature we use it for."
- "Sometimes when we put it in action, we have some blogs that appear as false positives. I think that it's improving. Barracuda should minimize false positives."
What is our primary use case?
We use Barracuda for all the cloud applications in Azure.
What is most valuable?
We use Barracuda to protect the application. That's the main feature we use it for.
What needs improvement?
Sometimes when we put it in action, we have some blogs that appear as false positives. I think that it's improving. Barracuda should minimize false positives.
They should make it easier to learn how to use applications.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Barracuda Web Application for five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability is okay. We haven't had any issues with stability.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We don't really scale it. We have around 500 users.
How are customer service and technical support?
We don't have issues with support. I had an issue with the console where I could not access the console from the inside network. When I accessed it from the inside network, they kicked me. I opened the case with support, we checked the perimeter firewall, and we tried to fix the problem, but it's still the problem.
Support wants me to check the firewall. I checked the administrator for the perimeter firewall and put all the rules for the communication but they told me to upgrade the version. I did and the problem still persisted.
I would rate their support an eight out of ten.
What about the implementation team?
We had a partner who did the installation.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate Barracuda an eight out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Security Consultant at Global Solutions
Great probabilities recommendations, great features, and great support
Pros and Cons
- "Its recommendation about the probabilities on the website is great. It also has free probability managers for the website, which is really helpful. The protection engine, signature-based protection behavior, and analysis features are also great. It also has an ATP module for sandbox scanning and behavior analysis for file uploads."
- "Its interface can be better. It is not very friendly."
What is our primary use case?
We use it for website and web service protection.
What is most valuable?
Its recommendation about the probabilities on the website is great. It also has free probability managers for the website, which is really helpful.
The protection engine, signature-based protection behavior, and analysis features are also great. It also has an ATP module for sandbox scanning and behavior analysis for file uploads.
What needs improvement?
Its interface can be better. It is not very friendly.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working with this solution for three years.
How are customer service and technical support?
They provide great support with a fast response.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was straightforward. It took us a day to deploy this solution.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate Barracuda Web Application Firewall a nine out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Reseller
Presales Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Optimized performance, user-friendly environment, responsive technical support
Pros and Cons
- "Barracuda Web Application Firewall provides optimized performance, a user-friendly environment, helpful dashboards, and is simple to use."
What is our primary use case?
Our clients are using the solution for internal banking software and website protection.
What is most valuable?
Barracuda Web Application Firewall provides optimized performance, a user-friendly environment, helpful dashboards, and is simple to use.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using this solution for approximately three years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution has been stable in our experience.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We have four clients using the solution.
How are customer service and technical support?
The technical support is very good. They were responsive and provide one of the best support in the market. They will assist you with any issues you might be facing.
How was the initial setup?
The installation was straightforward.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The price of the solution is a little expensive. There is a license for this solution and it can be purchased every one, two, or five years.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I have evaluated other solutions.
What other advice do I have?
I would recommend this solution to others.
I rate Barracuda Web Application Firewall an eight out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Head of Infrastructure at a tech company with 51-200 employees
Very good Web Application filter to protect your web applications from various hacker exploits
Valuable Features:
1) The Barracuda Networks Web Application Firewall can protect your vital web applications from various exploits by hackers.
2) Can be easily deployed and configured.
3) Can be used to protect many applications, like Microsoft Outlook Web Access, Oracle, FTP, SharePoint, XML, etc. It can also protect custom applications deployed within the environment.
4) Can be very easily integrated with Active Directory and various 2-factor authentication systems.
5) Has a built in virus scanner for any data uploads.
6) Reasonably priced
7) Checks both Inbound and Outbound traffic to ensure protection against any type of data leakage and theft.
8) Barracuda Web Application Firewall has a built in load balancer, which can easily distribute traffic to multiple backend servers.
Room for Improvement:
1) Generally speaking, the more complex your web application is, the greater the risk. Older sites are highly vulnerable to application layer security threats. Barracuda Networks Web Application Firewall is not tightly equipped to handle application layer security threats.
2) For SSL enabled sites, Barracuda Networks Web Application Firewall requires the duplication of the SSL certificate. This can pose SSL penetration and also significant scalability challenges.
3) Customer service and online support system is a bit slow and needs improvement.
Other Advice:
One of the best Web Application Filters to protect your web applications, like FTP, Microsoft Outlook Access, Sharepoint, etc. from hackers. Ease of integration, with various 2-factor authentication systems, is one of the highly sought after features.
It needs improvement in the way that it handles various SSL enabled sites.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Barracuda Web Application Firewall Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: November 2024
Product Categories
Web Application Firewall (WAF)Popular Comparisons
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
Azure Front Door
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
F5 Advanced WAF
Fortinet FortiWeb
Imperva Web Application Firewall
Kemp LoadMaster
Radware Alteon
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Barracuda Web Application Firewall Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- Imperva WAF vs. Barracuda: Which One is Better?
- Which is better, Barracuda Web Application Firewall or F5 Advanced WAF?
- Which WAF solution would you recommend to cater to 100 to 125 concurrent sessions?
- What do you recommend for a securing Web Application?
- Fortinet vs Sophos? Help choose a NGFW solution that can replace Microsoft TMG.
- Imperva WAF vs. Barracuda: Which One is Better?
- F5 vs. Imperva WAF?
- When should companies use SSL Inspection?
- NGFW with URL Filtering vs Web Proxy
- How does a WAF help to protect against DDoS attacks?