Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
reviewer1666944 - PeerSpot reviewer
Cloud Security Lead at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
Good reporting, and easy to install but the integration with ticketing systems could be improved
Pros and Cons
  • "The reporting is quite good. It is the most powerful aspect of this solution."
  • "In general, for the product to be successful, they need to improve security, and configuration detection."

What is our primary use case?

Primarily, we use this solution to detect security configurations in AWS environments.

What is most valuable?

The reporting is quite good. It is the most powerful aspect of this solution.

It's user-friendly.

What needs improvement?

In general, we abandoned this solution this year.

Each component of this solution, in my opinion, could be improved.

Integration with ticketing systems, as well as the most important noise and completeness over findings, are definitely in need of improvement. They didn't take into account some additional context.

The UI is very slow.

There is room for improvement. Consider the entire context of the findings and try to avoid making a comparison between the rule and the entity's state. In general, for the product to be successful, they need to improve security, and configuration detection.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management for two years.

Buyer's Guide
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP
December 2024
Learn what your peers think about Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2024.
823,875 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It generates a large number of false positives.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We haven't attempted to scale the product because there are no additional plug-ins or add-ons.

How are customer service and support?

We have contacted technical support but were not satisfied. Technical support needs improvement.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was straightforward.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis.

From a pricing perspective, they are pretty expensive. You can find better offerings on the market.

What other advice do I have?

I would not recommend this solution to other users.

I would rate Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management a seven out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
reviewer910575 - PeerSpot reviewer
Chief Technical Officer at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Intuitive dashboard but it needs to be more customizable
Pros and Cons
  • "The dashboard is intuitive. You know if you're compliant or not, and then it gives you a remediation plan."
  • "CloudGuard could be more customizable. It has built-in standards for things like GDPR compliance. But depending on your business lane, you might want to build your own controls based on your own standards."

What is our primary use case?

We use CloudGuard for compliance and auditing. About 20 people in our company use it, including our cloud administrators use it and security personnel. And now even our managers, our scrum masters are using it.

How has it helped my organization?

CloudGuard makes the management of our security controls in AWS more transparent. 

What is most valuable?

The dashboard is intuitive. You know if you're compliant or not, and then it gives you a remediation plan.

What needs improvement?

CloudGuard could be more customizable. It has built-in standards for things like GDPR compliance. But depending on your business lane, you might want to build your own controls based on your own standards. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using CloudGuard Posture Management for at least six months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

CloudGuard is pretty stable. It's rock-solid.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

In terms of scalability, CloudGuard requires a little bit of work. Sometimes it does take longer for the checks to come through, but it depends on how busy you are in the cloud. 

How are customer service and support?

Check Point tech support in North America is pretty good.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We really liked this other solution offered by a smaller company, and then a larger company bought it. I forgot the company's name, but the roadmap just went to pieces when it was bought out. All the tech people left the company then the chief technical officer resigned. It was terrible.

How was the initial setup?

Setting up CloudGuard is pretty straightforward. The initial setup only took a few minutes. It's essentially turnkey. However, the total deployment took about half a day. For maintenance, we have two cloud administrators. That's two in case one goes on vacation, resigns, or gets sick. So you need backup.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The license for CloudGuard Posture Management is about $80 a year, and it's based on your cloud footprint, not the number of users. So you could have a million users, and it doesn't matter. 

What other advice do I have?

I rate CloudGuard Posture Management seven out of 10. I would rate it higher, but I think the price point is pretty high for what it does. However, I know it's a burgeoning market. So I think the price point and some of the other features that I already mentioned, like customization, are pretty lacking. Still, if you want some cover for an internal or external audit, this is a tool for you. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP
December 2024
Learn what your peers think about Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2024.
823,875 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Hazel Zuñiga Rojas - PeerSpot reviewer
Administrative Assistant at Tecapro
Real User
Good compliance and risk assessment capabilities but needs to cover more legacy applications
Pros and Cons
  • "The product allows us to enhance the security of the implementations we have."
  • "We're looking for a solution that can incorporate legacy infrastructure for some of our business needs."

What is our primary use case?

We needed to establish a security posture under certain requirements. We needed to protect infrastructure as a service and our software as a service platform in each of our environments for the development and implementation of the cloud. 

We needed to provision instantaneous computing infrastructure and administration through the Internet. Management and security was the initial requirement, with more requirements being established. We were seeking a baseline that was provided to us by a security expert that would allow us to identify and remediate security risks and evaluate monitoring automation. We needed a solution that could prevent the company from being violated when implementing and managing a new configuration.

How has it helped my organization?

The solution give us compliance and offered continuous evaluation of the policies that were established. We managed to automatically generate tools for the detection and resolution of compliance and managed to establish supervision of the operations, including the management of each incident which involves identifying risks and qualifying in order to be able to share any news or updates. This allowed us to be more proactive, complete, and precise. 

What is most valuable?

The product allows us to enhance the security of the implementations we have. It has helped resolve several security incidents that we previously had, and we could not see since previously we did not have a solution that allowed us to quickly and safely manage each one of the activities. With Check Point, we can now map incidents and see how the security teams work to verify the integrity of the systems.  

What needs improvement?

When it comes to validating the power, security, implementation, and management, I would like to also have the capacity more easily on-premise as well as the cloud. Some problems have been found in analysis at the time of execution, and local install revision agents have generated management incompatibility. It is important to evaluate the applications that are on-site since they are needed in the organization. We're looking for a solution that can incorporate legacy infrastructure for some of our business needs.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used the solution for approximately nine months.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Other
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Hazel Zuñiga Rojas - PeerSpot reviewer
Administrative Assistant at Tecapro
Real User
Great machine learning, good analysis, and efficient responses to threats
Pros and Cons
  • "It learns from behavior, attacks, management, detections, captures packets, real-time analysis, et cetera. It's generating knowledge from a variety of sources for an excellent analysis."
  • "I'd like to see more advanced encryption for local features, which is not present right now."

What is our primary use case?

We wanted to protect, analyze, and detect issues within the infrastructure that we have taken to the cloud. We were looking for ways that we can analyze and introduce a more complete internal forensic analysis so that if an intrusion did not happen, we could have a visualization in which we could be constantly learning how to detect and ee anomalies and provide analysis for detection in real-time. 

How has it helped my organization?

We needed a solution that could handle analysis and offer automated detection with process intelligence. We were interested in threat prevention in real-time to help us detect anomalies, attempts, and atypical actions in any of the activities of the teams or users. The goal was to take advantage of that learning and detection. Machine learning supervises and analyzes in an advanced way everything that is happening in the cloud. It works within any type of cloud and can be integrated more so if we want to migrate or scale tomorrow, we can carry out this detection automatically.

What is most valuable?

The solution learns day by day. It learns from behavior, attacks, management, detections, captures packets, real-time analysis, et cetera. It's generating knowledge from a variety of sources for an excellent analysis. 

This allows us to move faster and have more efficient responses to incidents. It provides alerts for all these types of activities, achieving more objective management for packet capture and a combination of activities within the cloud environment.

What needs improvement?

I'd like to see more advanced encryption for local features, which is not present right now. We'd like to have more defined control when implementing intelligent analysis on the cloud. We'd like to extend analysis not just to crowds but to local teams for more granular analysis and advanced searchability.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used the solution for about a year and a bit.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Other
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Cloud Solution Architect at Network Thinking Solutions
User
A complete solution that's reasonably priced, with good data security
Pros and Cons
  • "The solution offers an excellent price, benefit, and installation relationship."
  • "Currently, worldwide, there are many companies of all sizes that do not understand the value that their data has, but even with all existing clouds, they also do not understand what the shared responsibility model is. They only assume that by having a cloud, the provider must ensure safety, when the truth is that the providers only secure their sites. Everything we do in the cloud and how we configure it is actually our responsibility."

What is our primary use case?

I have been using it in my AWS-Azure multi-cloud schema in order to monitor and protect transactions and data from all escalations - not only what we have at the database level. It helps us protect the data of our big data. 

It has been the complete solution to help cover our lack of security at the infrastructure level. Not only does it cover the servers, but at the workstation level, it is monitoring what users are doing. It identifies actions and can make automatic remediation at a user level. 

How has it helped my organization?

The solution has helped us to detect possible attacks or access that is not allowed. It also has helped us to identify the configurations that do not meet the company standards and allows us to improve security practices. As a result, we were able to make the necessary adjustments to be more armored and work safely. 

It gives us the peace of mind we need to continue exploring areas of our scheme that will help us with our projects in the short, medium, and long term. It will help us to continue innovating and reinventing ourselves with greater and greater security.

What is most valuable?

Data security has been very valuable because data is the soul of a company and if the data is not protected, the company has no possibility of existing. 

In all areas of an organization, Check Point CloudGuard is not only in the cloud, as its name implies. It goes beyond. The areas of importance from the most important to the least important are: infrastructure, technological security, data administration, legal department, etc. Check Point solutions can provide a complete 360 security scheme to the entire cloud infrastructure. It transfers its vision to the entire peripheral network.

What needs improvement?

Today, globally, there are many companies of all sizes that do not understand the value of their data, but even with all the existing clouds, they also do not understand what the shared responsibility model is. They only assume that by having a cloud, the provider must ensure security, when the truth is that providers only protect their sites. Everything we do in the cloud and how we configure it is actually our responsibility, in this sense we can evaluate many solutions that help us protect our clouds, however, and after trying 5 different solutions, the checkpoint solution is by far The most complete

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using the solution for 3 months.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

If we were using a similar but not as extensive solution. We were using Darktrace.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The solution offers an excellent price, benefit, and installation relationship. Thus far, Check Point has offered us this very successful relationship.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We were evaluating several options before choosing Check Point. What we identified would be important aspects of the new provider were: simplicity in the installation and 360 vision of all our infrastructure. When we were evaluating, we looked at Palo Alto, Check Point, and Cloud Security.

What other advice do I have?

If you are looking for a complete solution for your cloud or clouds, with Check Point you can have everything from one place.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Hybrid Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Cloud Infrastructure Architect at Maxis Berhad
Real User
Enables us to have a centralized view of all our visible assets ECs and inventories
Pros and Cons
  • "Dome9 has improved our organization; we have a centralized view of all of our assets, our visible assets our ECs, our inventories. And then all the policies are centralized, and it is easier to manage because everything is one component console."
  • "I would like to see Test B functions at the application access level."

What is our primary use case?

The primary use case for this solution is associated with a challenge whereby we have multiple cloud computing platforms. We have our past cloud platforms in AWS and ECP. Therefore, we can configure management and policy governance tools to deployment across all sites.

How has it helped my organization?

Dome9 has improved our organization in the way that we have a centralized view of all of our assets, our visible assets our ECs, our inventories. Then all the policies are centralized and it is easier to manage because everything is one component console. 

What needs improvement?

I would like to see Test B functions at the application access level.

For how long have I used the solution?

More than a year.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability is good.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The scalability is good.

How are customer service and technical support?

Technical support is excellent; they are quite supportive.

How was the initial setup?

The inial setup was straightforward.

The deployment took us about six months because we had issues while integrating. The issues weren't with Dome9.

What about the implementation team?

We implemented Dome9 ourselves, in-house. We used our own set of experts.
I think there is less than six staff required for deployment and maintenance.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The licensing costs for this solution are on a yearly basis.

What other advice do I have?

My advice is to try to get the trial period first because this will allow them to see if this is a suitable solution or not for their environment. They have to remember that this solution can only be compared to Test B, but it's not Test B. The trial allows for appropriate compatibility and suitability evaluations.

On a scale from one to ten, ten being the best, I would gladly rate this product an eight out of ten.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
Marketing at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
Vendor
Dome9 Cloud Street View for AWS Security: The Exponential Cloud Growth Visualization

Confidence is key when it comes to managing large IT systems. The tricky part is when a CIO tries to generate the trust and confidence of a company’s IT environment. Complete transparency is the answer. As you may recall, I’ve written about the need for transparency concerning Newvem’s services in the past. As the cloud industry market matures, the AWS cloud continues to grow at ground-breaking speeds, in addition to the usual individual cloud deployment. In either respect, transparency becomes an issue.

Cloud management vendors recognize the need for transparency and are taking the necessary steps to enhance their solutions to better support active visibility. The natural evolution of a typical management system begins with gathering data and presenting it in report tables. While traditional IT tools have had a similar evolution, the infinite cloud resources and dynamic manner of the environment take the lack of controllability issue to the extreme. This, makes visualization more crucial than in a traditional, finite data center.

This week, I met my good old `cloud friends` from Dome9 that released their new cloud security visualization solution, Dome9 Clarity –

“Think Street-view for AWS security. Transparency into on-premise security has been around for the last 15 years, we are simply extending this value to the cloud.” Zohar Alon, Co-Founder and CEO at Dome9.

Dome9 Clarity - each box it's an AWS security group

Dome9 Clarity – Visualizing the data flows between AWS security groups

The value of IT management features has more than proven itself over the last two decades. Issues concerning systems’ availability, security and performance are anything but new in the world of IT services. Despite the fact that the cloud doesn’t eliminate any of these concerns, it does force a change to the key methodologies and processes. As an ex-Check Point employee, Zohar Alon, Dome9’s Co-Founder and CEO, built and led the security giant’s security firewall management systems. With this experience, the natural next step was to apply his knowledge to the world of the cloud.

Dome9’s Cloud Clarity provides cloud network security visualization within the AWS cloud. It is the sensible solution for optimized cloud security management. Controlling an environment with hundreds or thousands of EC2 instances that are grouped into as many as hundreds of security groups, not to mention the rapid and dynamic growth of inter-dependencies is far from an easy DevOps’ task. With Dome9, AWS users get a visual picture of their AWS VPCs and security group configurations. According to Alon, their new capability reduces such security audit efforts significantly and has been proven to condense four hours of auditing work into a mere 15 minutes – quite impressive!

As cloud deployments become more and more complex, consequently, the overall stack complicates as well. DevOps models evolve to be able to regain control supported by distributed systems’ methodologies. With the help of Clarity’s real visibility feature, customers are enabled with a clear understanding of their security system, which in turn enables control and support of the modern application stack.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Myrian  Medina - PeerSpot reviewer
Head of Technology and Systems at Simed
Real User
Top 5
A product that performs well and enables users to control the information that goes out of their company
Pros and Cons
  • "The product enables us to check the information that goes out of the company."
  • "The product must provide different features like antivirus."

What is our primary use case?

We use the solution to control all the emails that go out from the company. We also use it to protect our network by stopping unauthorized people from accessing it.

What is most valuable?

The product enables us to check the information that goes out of the company. We get to know if someone sends our sales emails to our competitors. We control the information that goes out of the company. It’s a good product.

What needs improvement?

The product must provide different features like antivirus.

For how long have I used the solution?

I am currently using the solution.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The tool always performs very well. All the upgrades happen automatically. We haven't had a problem with it.

How are customer service and support?

We haven’t needed much support.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The solution’s pricing is a little bit high. I rate the product’s pricing a seven out of ten on a scale of one to ten, where one is the lowest price, and ten is the highest price.

What other advice do I have?

I would like to implement all the security solutions from Check Point in our company. Overall, I rate the product an eight out of ten.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: December 2024
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.