Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Mantu Shaw - PeerSpot reviewer
Project Manager at Incedo Inc.
MSP
Top 20
Helpful technical support, with a seamless setup and good integration with the public cloud
Pros and Cons
  • "Auto remediation is a very effective feature that helps ensure less manual intervention."
  • "Almost all features are good, however, they still require improvements to the code security portion on which integration with the major source code repository is required."

What is our primary use case?

The product provides complete visibility of our cloud security posture. It supports servers and Cloud-Native Services. It provides a centralized solution for Cloud Security with risk and compliance management. 

We required it to manage various compliance requirements including live ISO, SOC, PCI and it supports everything. Our Organization is in a hybrid structure and in it, we are using various AWS and Azure accounts. Earlier, we managed everything individually, however, after the implementation of it, we now manage everything from a single solution. The single solution helps with the system, network, and security administration.

How has it helped my organization?

The solution provides the complete visibility of Cloud Security, as well as a number of baseline policies and rules. This helps us to manage cloud posture with less effort. After implementation, it reduced administrative effort in terms of managed security over the cloud. Now, we are not dependent on individual tools for each account as well as cloud service providers. 

After implementation, the team can generate reports from a single console for all compliance needs.

Auto Remediation is a very effective feature and it improves the need for manual intervention from the security and cloud administrator.

What is most valuable?

The baseline policy and the integration with the public cloud are very easy.

The number of compliance rulesets along with the baseline policy, support of cloud-native services, and license management are easy. Support of the CI/CD pipeline security (Code Security), Kubernetes, et cetera, is useful. 

There are very helpful and various types of reports. Reporting features are very good and anyone from the compliance team can view/generate a report according to compliance support.

Auto remediation is a very effective feature that helps ensure less manual intervention.

Support of AWS Lamda and Azure Functions helps for any potential breaches.

What needs improvement?

Almost all features are good, however, they still require improvements to the code security portion on which integration with the major source code repository is required.

Integration with CI/CD is an important aspect as it is needed to secure the environment. Having it will help a lot.

Integration with Docker is also a key feature that needs some improvements.

Integration with other third parties and with SIEM is an important aspect that should be addressed.

Currently, it provides integration with Tenable, but it would be good if it had support other VAPT software as well.

Buyer's Guide
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using Check Point CloudGuard Posture management for the last 8+ months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is very stable and we have not found any gaps. It provides seamless integration with the public cloud.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It's a highly scalable solution and integration with the public cloud is very good. The way you can centralize the dashboard of entire cloud infra is a very impressive.

How are customer service and support?

Support has been good. We implement it with the help of OEM support and whenever we've required help we've received a good response.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Earlier, we tested other tools as well, however, the features which were available via Check Point are very good and the future roadmap is also very good in regards to cloud security.

How was the initial setup?

The setup is straightforward and seamless.

What about the implementation team?

We implemented it with help of Check Point support. The rest was managed by our internal team as it's easy to handle.

What was our ROI?

Security is very important and gives us ROI from security itself. We also get an ROI as we have less administrative effort. We can see an ROI with the compliance and risk management on offer too.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The setup cost is very affordable and very easy. Integration with the public cloud is very easy. The licensing calculation is also very good and no manual effort is required.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We evaluated other tools like Rapid7, Qualys, and AWS native security tools, as well as Azure native security tools.

What other advice do I have?

It's a very strong solution for cloud security posture management and very effective for large and mid-size environments. Any organization moving towards the cloud would benefit from this.  

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1440831 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Security Engineer at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Enables us to manage all instances and accounts, whether Azure or AWS, through a single portal
Pros and Cons
  • "The audit feature is the most valuable for compliance reasons. It gives you a full view of the whole environment, no matter how many accounts you have in AWS or Azure. You have it all under one umbrella."
  • "The accuracy of its remediation is a 7.5 out of 10. Before, I would have given it a ten but now, to handle remediation for fully qualified domain names, it's not working as it did in the past. We're finding some difficulties there."

What is our primary use case?

We use Dome9 for security groups on the AWS/Azure side. We use it for inventory purposes, to gather all of the accounts into one single view. We do some governance and compliance in it as well.

How has it helped my organization?

The solution enables customizable governance using simple readable language. It all depends on how you customize it. If you customize it properly, you'll definitely have full visibility of the environment.

Similarly, if it's customized well it helps minimize attack surface. For example, you can lock the security groups to be managed only through Dome9, so any change made directly on AWS would be reverted by Dome9. That helps minimize the risk.

In addition, it integrates security best practices and compliance regulations into the CI/CD, across cloud providers. You can set up the automation so that if any group is created outside of Dome9, it is reverted. You can also run scheduling functionality to identify anything that is not compliant.

It also helps developers save time and increase their productivity. If they save time they have more time to do other things, whether within Dome9 or elsewhere. The features that are offered by Dome9 definitely make developers more productive. I would estimate it saves 10 to 15 percent of their time. And it absolutely saves time and increases productivity for security teams, by about 20 percent.

Another benefit is that Dome9 provides a unified security solution across all major public clouds. You manage all the instances and all the different accounts, whether Azure or AWS, through a single portal. Otherwise, with AWS, for example, you would have to log in to each account individually, and if you wanted to run reports, you would have to do it at the account level. If you have ten accounts, you'd have to go through ten accounts. Whereas, with Dome9, you can see all of the accounts in one place, run one query, and obtain everything. And you can play around with the report in Excel and filter it for what account you want to look at.

What is most valuable?

The audit feature is the most valuable for compliance reasons. It gives you a full view of the whole environment, no matter how many accounts you have in AWS or Azure. You have it all under one umbrella.

We use solution’s security rule sets and compliance frameworks and, again, for compliance purposes, we do have the full view. We see all of our vulnerable, open ports and open IPs. Its comprehensiveness for cloud compliance and governance is good. If it was not a good product that defines all aspects of cloud security, we would not be using it.

Also, Dome9’s accuracy when it comes to compliance checking is a nine out of 10. I would not give it a ten because sometimes the report is returning something and when we look at it on the AWS side, it's not exactly the way it showed on the report, because of the layout of the report. The accuracy of the security visibility is a nine out of 10. I give it a high score because we have full security visibility over the incidents and the groups, everything that is related to AWS. It's not a ten because sometimes you have to look in different places to get the full visibility, as it's not all gathered in the same place.

What needs improvement?

The accuracy of its remediation is a 7.5 out of 10. Before, I would have given it a ten but now, to handle remediation for fully qualified domain names, it's not working as it did in the past. We're finding some difficulties there.

Also, as soon as Check Point took over the solution, the feature that identifies and creates security groups based on fully qualified domain names, instead of IP addresses, was degraded.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Dome9 for two-plus years. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It's quite stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It scales well.

In terms of increasing usage, it all depends on the size of the company. If we grow, the number of the users will grow as well.

How are customer service and technical support?

The support for Dome9 is not thrilling. It was degraded when Check Point took over. Support needs a push. When Check Point bought the solution, they did not fully understand it. So when we called support, we would get sent in different directions before someone knew what we were talking about. I would rate the support at five out of 10.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We did not have a previous solution.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup of the solution was straightforward for me as a professional working in the cloud environment. For someone else who is a beginner or not familiar with cloud products, he or she might find it a bit difficult. It all depends on the level of knowledge that each person has.

The deployment took a week or two, and that was not full-time.

We have about ten users of the solution, including security engineers, analysts, cloud engineers, enterprise engineers, and architects.

What about the implementation team?

We had a sales engineer from Dome9 and he gave us a push. The support they provided back then was good.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

When looking at the native cloud security controls provided by our cloud vendors, when it comes to features like transparency and customization, I would give full credit to Dome9. If the  cloud vendors did offer what Dome9 is offering, we would not be using Dome9. We use Dome9 because of the features it offers.

As for maintaining and scaling security services and configurations across multiple public clouds, it depends. If I have one account, it will take me the same amount of time to do it, whether in Dome9 or directly on the cloud vendor's portal. But if I have, say, five AWS accounts and I want to implement a change, I would have to do it five times to those five different accounts. In Dome9, I can do it one time for all five accounts.

We did look at other vendors' solutions, in addition to Dome9. Back then, the FQDN was compatible and that was one of the main features that pushed us to select Dome9.

What other advice do I have?

Scale it right the very first time and you will be happy. You need to have cloud knowledge to do so. If you don't, outsource that task to a vendor, to a contractor, or to Dome9. By getting it right the very first time, you are starting on a good basis. If you don't do it right, you're not going to take full advantage of the features being offered by Dome9.


Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer2297610 - PeerSpot reviewer
Subgerente De Operaciones at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
Top 20
Provides a lot of visibility and helps to maintain a good posture
Pros and Cons
  • "Visibility is a key feature. It helps me to validate my overall network posture."

    What is our primary use case?

    We use CloudGuard CNAPP to verify the posture management of our cloud gateway.

    How has it helped my organization?

    CloudGuard CNAPP helps us improve security, verify vulnerabilities, and understand overall network behaviors. It helps us to have greater visibility of the posture and the gateways that are in the cloud. It also helps us to see where the gaps are and how the attack levels are.

    CloudGuard CNAPP helps us a lot in being able to identify erroneous configurations or configurations that may not be as per the standard that we use internally or as per an international standard.

    CloudGuard CNAPP's Cloud Security Posture Management identifies the risks that are most critical to our business. In some cases, we could identify that our posture level dropped, and we were able to identify what we needed. We were able to make adjustments to be able to have an adequate level of protection.

    We use CloudGuard CNAPP's CloudGuard Workload Protection capabilities. We have several gateways, and within them, or between our clouds, we are protecting everything, such as servers and containers. In this way, we maintain complete protection, and logically, we have visibility into everything that enters and leaves our premises and our cloud.

    The scanning provided by CloudGuard Workload Protection helps us identify problems before they go live.

    What is most valuable?

    Visibility is a key feature. It helps me to validate my overall network posture.

    What needs improvement?

    In a general sense, it is a tremendous solution. We have got good use out of it. From what I see, it is also well-positioned in the market. I understand that it is among the best solutions.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have been using CloudGuard CNAPP for about five years. 

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    Its scalability potential is good.

    How are customer service and support?

    Their support is excellent.

    How would you rate customer service and support?

    Positive

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    We did not use a similar solution previously.

    How was the initial setup?

    We use Azure Cloud and AWS Cloud. The deployment was very easy. We worked with Check Point for implementation.

    What about the implementation team?

    We took Check Point's help with implementation.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    We did not evaluate any other solution.

    What other advice do I have?

    I would rate CloudGuard CNAPP a ten out of ten. It is an excellent solution. When we used it for the first time, we verified that this solution was on top of other solutions. This platform has helped us to maintain a posture with a lot of visibility. It helps us a lot.

    Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
    Flag as inappropriate
    PeerSpot user
    Senior Security Specialist at Tech Mahindra Limited
    Vendor
    Top 20
    A good next-generation firewall with helpful filtering but needs better support
    Pros and Cons
    • "Overall, it provides good security."
    • "Their service needs improvement."

    What is our primary use case?

    We have a hybrid environment so we use Check Point Cloud Guard to protect the cloud workload. On-prem, we are already using the Check Point Firewalls so we can manage both environment firewalls using the same management server, AKA the smart console, which saves time and effort to look for logs during any type of troubleshooting. It helps us avoid creating the same objects for each firewall but also provides a single pane of glass through which we can see all gateways, logs, policies, objects, user management, and traffic tracing. 

    How has it helped my organization?

    It is a next-generation firewall that helps a lot in many ways to protect my workloads from threats, such as: 

    - firewall blade providing protection at Layer 3 and 4

    - application filtering blade providing protection from unauthorized applications or services

    - URL filtering providing protection on malicious URLs based on various categories as updated by Check Point on a daily basis

    - threat prevention and sandboxing capability to actually help with unknown or zero-day threats (it tests, removes the malicious content, and then releases or blocks by itself)

    Overall, it provides good security.

    What is most valuable?

    The threat extraction and emulation module is a savior for us from unknown threats. We know that daily millions of new threats emerge over the internet so we like that it provides protection from them all. It's good to have a sandboxing environment that can first assess the threat before releasing it to the production environment. These threats are called zero-day threats for which there is no signature or update available whether it be on an endpoint, machine, antivirus solution, or other software. Therefore, it becomes very useful to use this feature to stop threats from spreading right at the gateway itself.

    What needs improvement?

    Their service needs improvement. Their vendor doesn't provide good support. Also, there is no way to escalate it to Check Point so that Check Point can take action against their partner. I don't have direct support with Check Point. We have collaborative support with one of the Check Point partners who do not provide good support. When we reached out to Check Point to escalate; they denied taking any action against the vendor.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I've used the solution for five years.

    Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

    Hybrid Cloud
    Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
    PeerSpot user
    reviewer2119419 - PeerSpot reviewer
    Senior Accountant at SORECO
    User
    Top 5
    Comprehensive security, excellent intrusion alerting, and reliable threat hunting
    Pros and Cons
    • "It provides the most useful tools for protecting our financial account records from hackers."
    • "Timely updates and upgrades to meet modern technological changes could help improve performance and limit the chances of downtime."

    What is our primary use case?

    The threat-hunting system provides forensics through machine learning visualization with real-time insights into processes from a multi-cloud environment. 

    It has powerful tools that detect any threats in the network infrastructure in advance before it penetrates into our systems. 

    It has repulsed many attacks that have been launched by malware attackers that could destroy data. 

    The CloudGuard Intelligence provides alerts that prepare the IT team to set up effective measures after detecting threats. 

    The product performance has enabled each team to work without fear of any threats.

    How has it helped my organization?

    It provides the most useful tools for protecting our financial account records from hackers. 

    The application has boosted security from all the company sources. We have not lost confidential data to external cyber attackers since we deployed this platform. 

    Faster responses to malware threats have saved the organization from engaging in insecure transaction losses. 

    The product has safeguarded the entire financial system from external interference. 

    We used to experience the challenges of data protection before we deployed this application. There are improvements in data management and security with a positive impact on work processes.

    What is most valuable?

    The advanced data analytics on the security of the applications has provided effective insights that helped in safeguarding confidential information. 

    The intrusion alerts and notifications have saved us a lot of time and resources in enhancing reliable security. 

    The comprehensive security from cloud and on-premises has saved data centers from attacks and provides a reliable environment for boosting production. 

    Cloud threat intelligence provides useful insights that help in planning effectively during the process of implementing projects and tasks.

    What needs improvement?

    The security investigation features that are present have been performing excellently since we deployed this application. There are few licensing and network coverage cases, however, the customer service team is always ready to solve any problem. 

    Timely updates and upgrades to meet modern technological changes could help improve performance and limit the chances of downtime. 

    The performance has been stable for a long time since we deployed it. The few hitches which we have experienced can be solved without affecting the workflow performance. 

    The Check Point team has done a great job, and I recommend their products to other companies.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I've used the solution for ten months.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    This solution has been stable with reliable operations.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    I am impressed by its reliable performance, and I recommend it to other business enterprises.

    How are customer service and support?

    Customer service and support always provide effective guidelines when contacted.

    How would you rate customer service and support?

    Positive

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    The other security products that I have worked with had responded poorly which is why we moved to Check Point.

    How was the initial setup?

    The setup procedure was straightforward.

    What about the implementation team?

    The implementation was done by the vendor.

    What was our ROI?

    There is increased ROI from the product's stable performance.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    This platform offers modern security for threats that will arise in any organization.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    I evaluated several products. I settled on Check Point CloudGuard Intelligence based on their reliable services.

    What other advice do I have?

    This is a great and powerful platform for securing organizations from cyber attacks.

    Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

    Public Cloud
    Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
    PeerSpot user
    Edwin Solano Salmeron - PeerSpot reviewer
    Soporte técnico superior at Acobo
    Real User
    Top 5Leaderboard
    Identifies issues, offers good analysis, and has automation capabilities
    Pros and Cons
    • "It has an analytics service that does research for us."
    • "The solution could be improved with a greater analysis of its Microsoft Security score."

    What is our primary use case?

    We were in the review analysis, seeking a fast, efficient infrastructure with solid bases of data analysis and investigation. We wanted something that managed to establish and analyze systems in production so that it would not impact their use. We also wanted a visualization of our current state, with a solution that could give an example of the route that must be taken to achieve excellence in security. This tool has allowed us to achieve stronger security, allows for better analysis, and provides structure and guidance for better guides and international policies under a legal framework. 

    How has it helped my organization?

    It has given us a way to clearly and objectively identify items or issues before making any changes to the network. It offers assurance, after investigation, of a clear understanding of what each analysis is trying to define. We can now clearly and specifically achieve what we need to do from a security standpoint to help us make an action plan and achieve goals. Once we have the information, it is important to define and analyze the data collected, organize information in a format that makes sense to us administrators, and look for patterns or trends that may be useful for our investigation.

    What is most valuable?

    It has an analytics service that does research for us. This can provide valuable information to ultimately improve our infrastructure. Via research and analysis, we are able to identify problem areas. We can find trends and take action to fix problems while improving performance. 

    Its fairly advanced automation allows us to simplify and speed up security management in the cloud. This includes being able to identify, correct, and validate all kinds of vulnerabilities that reduce the manual workload for each of our company's administrators, thus being more efficient. With this new efficiency, we are able to reach effective resolutions at all times. 

    What needs improvement?

    The tool has several specific characteristics at the Microsoft 365 or Exchange level. 

    The solution could be improved with a greater analysis of its Microsoft Security score. They should be improving the visualization of data and greater coverage in Sharepoint or Teams. Its posture analysis is currently low. There could be improvement or capacity to be more efficient if we managed to achieve greater integration with Microsoft Security score, improvements in data visualization,, and greater coverage of Microsoft 365 resources.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I've used the solution for one year. 

    Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

    Public Cloud
    Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
    PeerSpot user
    Hugo Alexis Espinoza Naranjo - PeerSpot reviewer
    Perimeter Security Administrator at a security firm with 51-200 employees
    Real User
    Top 5Leaderboard
    Centralizes data, detects anomalies and can send alerts
    Pros and Cons
    • "This platform has allowed us to collect data from multiple sources, centralizing everything under a single source."
    • "We want to be able to customize the solution more in order to meet the needs of our company."

    What is our primary use case?

    This is one of the solutions that we have sought in order to establish an intelligent analysis. It has helped us collect data on our accounts in the cloud and applications. It offers integrations and provides real-time analysis of security issues. The platform learns automatically and manages to identify abnormal behaviors to help us detect anomalies. Additionally, we can configure automatic notifications that help us act during detected incidents.

    How has it helped my organization?

    It helps to have a centralization of data, alerts, and reports. There is a main data center that has generated reports and alerts that can include information about security trends and unusual user activity. It offers recommendations to improve security. The data collection and action activity logs provide information about usage, performance, and resources including traffic logs, usage logs, storage, and available space. We can also see CPU and memory, among other characteristics.

    What is most valuable?

    Currently, as an organization, we rely on technologies to save and store advanced data analysis information. We can take advantage of automated learning to detect and respond to security threats in real time in the cloud. 

    This platform has allowed us to collect data from multiple sources, centralizing everything under a single source. The repository includes audit logs, activity logs, and network logs to help us identify unusual patterns and negative trends that may affect the security of users.

    Using the information the product provides, we have effectively and accurately detected real-time troubleshooting of suspicious user attempts to log into an account and we can detect suspicious login attempts. We'll get alerts, which have helped us automate security in order to act fast.

    What needs improvement?

    We want to optimize the tool in the future. They should allow us to have greater integration with other security solutions and third-party tools so that the organization can take advantage of and improve the protection of all the company infrastructure. 

    We would like to optimize and improve its high demand for customization, which allows us to adapt to specific necessary security solutions. We want to be able to customize the solution more in order to meet the needs of our company. Currently, the solution is quite rigid and complies only with standards. 

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I've used the solution for one year.

    Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

    Public Cloud
    Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
    PeerSpot user
    Azure Specialist at a tech company with 10,001+ employees
    User
    It can be deployed as a SaaS solution, provide a consolidated view, and complete vulnerability scans
    Pros and Cons
    • "The new scanning function is a valuable feature that wasn't available until recently."
    • "CloudGuard CNAPP could be enhanced by increasing the number of components that run natively on Azure."

    What is our primary use case?

    When idle virtual machines hosting Azure Functions require protection and vulnerability scanning, we can leverage the Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP solution to gain a consolidated single pane of glass view and manage these workloads.

    How has it helped my organization?

    By utilizing Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP for security, our clients can now protect both their cloud and on-premise assets. CloudGuard CNAPP also provides a single pane of glass for multi-cloud management, including protection for their Azure resources.

    What is most valuable?

    The new scanning function is a valuable feature that wasn't available until recently. Importantly, it's enabled by default.

    Another advantage of CloudGuard CNAPP is that it can be deployed as a SaaS solution on Check Point Standard, eliminating the need for a custom subscription. This flexibility is a significant improvement.

    What needs improvement?

    CloudGuard CNAPP could be enhanced by increasing the number of components that run natively on Azure. This would allow Check Point to offer a forward-looking security solution that caters to customers who require a purely Azure-based environment. Currently, the mixed architecture involving on-premises and AWS deployments might not meet all compliance and security needs.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have been using Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP for one year.

    What was our ROI?

    Our clients can measure the return on investment of CloudGuard CNAPP in several ways. Firstly, it offers improved operational metrics compared to traditional methods. This eliminates the need for retraining staff on specific cloud vendors, as CloudGuard CNAPP provides a unified platform. Secondly, the ease of implementation contributes to a faster ROI. By considering factors like implementation speed, ongoing maintenance requirements, and reduced training needs, we can effectively measure the ROI of CloudGuard CNAPP.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    We evaluated Azure Functions, but for existing Check Point customers, it might be more advantageous from a security standpoint for their operations team to maintain a single pane of glass for their existing on-premises and other cloud provider investments. This would allow them to adopt a multi-cloud approach.

    What other advice do I have?

    I would rate Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP ten out of ten. Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is a great solution.

    We use the posture management capabilities of CloudGuard CNAPP and the workload protection capabilities.

    Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
    Flag as inappropriate
    PeerSpot user
    Buyer's Guide
    Download our free Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
    Updated: November 2024
    Buyer's Guide
    Download our free Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.