Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Support at a security firm with 51-200 employees
User
Top 5
Great management, good security, and offers automated compliance checks
Pros and Cons
  • "Helps identify and correct misconfigurations in cloud environments, ensuring that infrastructure and applications are secure and optimized."
  • "The Check Point solution is somewhat expensive."

What is our primary use case?

Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management has helped us a lot with generating a more secure public cloud. It tries to verify and apply improvements in order to seek to avoid vulnerabilities in environments such as Azure.

The tool is really robust. It allows us, through evaluations, to verify our compliance, detecting and correcting it in a timely manner.

The integration with the intelligence tool helps us a lot to detect and prevent threats in a timely and effective manner.

How has it helped my organization?

At a business level, Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management helps us a lot with the management, security, control, and prevention of cyber threats in multi-cloud environments. In our case, our environments are both in Microsoft Azure and local environments.

Another great help is in identity. It helps us to manage your protection in a timely manner. Compliance evaluations are great for all security.

In addition, the Check Point Infinity Portal is quite good and centralized.

What is most valuable?

The key features of Check Point CloudGuard Posture are:

  • The ability to provide automated compliance checks.
  • Helps identify and correct misconfigurations in cloud environments, ensuring that infrastructure and applications are secure and optimized.
  • Provides visibility into cloud infrastructure, applications, and security posture.
  • Automates security policies and remediation actions to ensure cloud environments remain secure and compliant.               

What needs improvement?

Some CloudGuard Check Point positions are not required by the company, however, if we do not apply it, it affects our score.

The support SLA is not met. Sometimes they don't seem to like solving cloud issues or modern security applications.

The Check Point solution is somewhat expensive. It must be validated first before purchasing it. 

Buyer's Guide
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP
November 2025
Learn what your peers think about Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2025.
873,085 professionals have used our research since 2012.

For how long have I used the solution?

We used the solution for our public cloud environment with Azure, over the last year.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
reviewer2104284 - PeerSpot reviewer
Java Application Developer at Oesia
User
Secures data, detects cloud anomalies, and offers reliable licensing
Pros and Cons
  • "The comprehensive security for IaaS and PaaS cloud assets provides efficient security awareness to all the teams."
  • "No improvements are needed."

What is our primary use case?

Check Point CloudGuard Intelligence provides security for the organization's cloud assets. 

It provides awareness to all the teams based on the security situations and precautions that can block future threats. 

It detects cloud anomalies to enhance workload safety and quarantine threats with a powerful threat intelligence feed. 

It secures data that is stored in the cloud servers. 

The security model provides alerts on policy violations and reports on cloud security. 

The intelligence information has helped us to plan and allocate resources efficiently.

How has it helped my organization?

It has established a network management system that enables each sector to monitor data flow in elastic cloud environments. 

We have been able to get reports on cloud performance and workload safety. 

The cloud networking infrastructure has been upgraded with modern data management tools that have advanced the communication system. 

It has steered the implementation of projects and tasks in a secure environment that is free from malware attacks. 

The cloud-based storage facilities are shielded from phishing attacks and cyber attacks.

What is most valuable?

The comprehensive security for IaaS and PaaS cloud assets provides efficient security awareness to all the teams. 

The data querying system gives team members an opportunity to select and give priority to the most crucial information. 

The intelligence system has powerful security management systems that have put measures in place to curb any hidden threats that can affect workflows. 

The cost and licensing terms are reliable, and many business enterprises can maintain them without facing financial challenges.

What needs improvement?

No improvements are needed. The current version has great and powerful features that take care of most sets of demands. The cloud-integrated network system can be upgraded to meet company requirements on intelligence information and for customization purposes. The set features have stable performance capability with the modern threat management network infrastructure. 

This system has a capable data orchestration system that can access data from various centers. The customer support channels are reliable, with great services when contacted.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used the solution for eight months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

This solution is stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I am impressed by the performance.

How are customer service and support?

The customer service support staff is reliable.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I have not used a similar solution.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was straightforward.

What about the implementation team?

It was implemented by the vendor.

What was our ROI?

There is increased ROI from a great performance.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The setup cost and licensing terms are always good.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

This is the best platform that I have worked with.

What other advice do I have?

This is a great solution for any organization.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP
November 2025
Learn what your peers think about Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2025.
873,085 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Hazel Zuñiga Rojas - PeerSpot reviewer
Administrative Assistant at Tecapro
Real User
Great machine learning, good analysis, and efficient responses to threats
Pros and Cons
  • "It learns from behavior, attacks, management, detections, captures packets, real-time analysis, et cetera. It's generating knowledge from a variety of sources for an excellent analysis."
  • "I'd like to see more advanced encryption for local features, which is not present right now."

What is our primary use case?

We wanted to protect, analyze, and detect issues within the infrastructure that we have taken to the cloud. We were looking for ways that we can analyze and introduce a more complete internal forensic analysis so that if an intrusion did not happen, we could have a visualization in which we could be constantly learning how to detect and ee anomalies and provide analysis for detection in real-time. 

How has it helped my organization?

We needed a solution that could handle analysis and offer automated detection with process intelligence. We were interested in threat prevention in real-time to help us detect anomalies, attempts, and atypical actions in any of the activities of the teams or users. The goal was to take advantage of that learning and detection. Machine learning supervises and analyzes in an advanced way everything that is happening in the cloud. It works within any type of cloud and can be integrated more so if we want to migrate or scale tomorrow, we can carry out this detection automatically.

What is most valuable?

The solution learns day by day. It learns from behavior, attacks, management, detections, captures packets, real-time analysis, et cetera. It's generating knowledge from a variety of sources for an excellent analysis. 

This allows us to move faster and have more efficient responses to incidents. It provides alerts for all these types of activities, achieving more objective management for packet capture and a combination of activities within the cloud environment.

What needs improvement?

I'd like to see more advanced encryption for local features, which is not present right now. We'd like to have more defined control when implementing intelligent analysis on the cloud. We'd like to extend analysis not just to crowds but to local teams for more granular analysis and advanced searchability.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used the solution for about a year and a bit.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Other
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Hazel Zuñiga Rojas - PeerSpot reviewer
Administrative Assistant at Tecapro
Real User
Good compliance and risk assessment capabilities but needs to cover more legacy applications
Pros and Cons
  • "The product allows us to enhance the security of the implementations we have."
  • "We're looking for a solution that can incorporate legacy infrastructure for some of our business needs."

What is our primary use case?

We needed to establish a security posture under certain requirements. We needed to protect infrastructure as a service and our software as a service platform in each of our environments for the development and implementation of the cloud. 

We needed to provision instantaneous computing infrastructure and administration through the Internet. Management and security was the initial requirement, with more requirements being established. We were seeking a baseline that was provided to us by a security expert that would allow us to identify and remediate security risks and evaluate monitoring automation. We needed a solution that could prevent the company from being violated when implementing and managing a new configuration.

How has it helped my organization?

The solution give us compliance and offered continuous evaluation of the policies that were established. We managed to automatically generate tools for the detection and resolution of compliance and managed to establish supervision of the operations, including the management of each incident which involves identifying risks and qualifying in order to be able to share any news or updates. This allowed us to be more proactive, complete, and precise. 

What is most valuable?

The product allows us to enhance the security of the implementations we have. It has helped resolve several security incidents that we previously had, and we could not see since previously we did not have a solution that allowed us to quickly and safely manage each one of the activities. With Check Point, we can now map incidents and see how the security teams work to verify the integrity of the systems.  

What needs improvement?

When it comes to validating the power, security, implementation, and management, I would like to also have the capacity more easily on-premise as well as the cloud. Some problems have been found in analysis at the time of execution, and local install revision agents have generated management incompatibility. It is important to evaluate the applications that are on-site since they are needed in the organization. We're looking for a solution that can incorporate legacy infrastructure for some of our business needs.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used the solution for approximately nine months.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Other
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Jonathan Ramos G. - PeerSpot reviewer
Cloud Engineer at ITQS
Real User
Top 20
Helpful analytics, great reports, and helps strengthen our security posture
Pros and Cons
  • "We like the ability to investigate, analyze, and generate reports."
  • "Currently, I would like this solution extended to cellular devices or tablets."

What is our primary use case?

In recent years, in search of a new strategy, we have tried to strengthen our security and infrastructure posture, being one of the fundamental pillars of a large organization. 

As a result of this situation, we have begun to adapt using solutions that support us at the cloud and on-premise. Posture Management is the solution that supports us in this search for a healthy, strong infrastructure and, above all, is aligned with the legal and regulatory frameworks at an international level.

How has it helped my organization?

This tool is very integrated for emerging infrastructures such as the cloud. It comes to support us with this new legal framework. Ideas, opinions, and regulations serve as a baseline to protect us from new methods or attacks. Without this legal framework, it would become more difficult, as many organizations are new to the use of the cloud. This solution gives us support from the experts who have been first in this model of infrastructure and services. We can ensure that by following and adapting our needs based on these guidelines we will be a great organization with a strong vision and a great security framework established to protect us. 

What is most valuable?

We like the ability to investigate, analyze, and generate reports.

Its most notable feature is to extend the analytics it performs to teams in any available cloud. 

We can collect analysis and be able to transform in such a way that the data provided allows us to find great value in institutional security. We can support each other to be better and more efficient daily. 

What needs improvement?

Currently, I would like this solution extended to cellular devices or tablets. This will be able to allow us to be more efficient.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used the solution for one year.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1666944 - PeerSpot reviewer
Cloud Security Lead at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
Good reporting, and easy to install but the integration with ticketing systems could be improved
Pros and Cons
  • "The reporting is quite good. It is the most powerful aspect of this solution."
  • "In general, for the product to be successful, they need to improve security, and configuration detection."

What is our primary use case?

Primarily, we use this solution to detect security configurations in AWS environments.

What is most valuable?

The reporting is quite good. It is the most powerful aspect of this solution.

It's user-friendly.

What needs improvement?

In general, we abandoned this solution this year.

Each component of this solution, in my opinion, could be improved.

Integration with ticketing systems, as well as the most important noise and completeness over findings, are definitely in need of improvement. They didn't take into account some additional context.

The UI is very slow.

There is room for improvement. Consider the entire context of the findings and try to avoid making a comparison between the rule and the entity's state. In general, for the product to be successful, they need to improve security, and configuration detection.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management for two years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It generates a large number of false positives.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We haven't attempted to scale the product because there are no additional plug-ins or add-ons.

How are customer service and support?

We have contacted technical support but were not satisfied. Technical support needs improvement.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was straightforward.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis.

From a pricing perspective, they are pretty expensive. You can find better offerings on the market.

What other advice do I have?

I would not recommend this solution to other users.

I would rate Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management a seven out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
reviewer910575 - PeerSpot reviewer
Chief Technical Officer at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Intuitive dashboard but it needs to be more customizable
Pros and Cons
  • "The dashboard is intuitive. You know if you're compliant or not, and then it gives you a remediation plan."
  • "CloudGuard could be more customizable. It has built-in standards for things like GDPR compliance. But depending on your business lane, you might want to build your own controls based on your own standards."

What is our primary use case?

We use CloudGuard for compliance and auditing. About 20 people in our company use it, including our cloud administrators use it and security personnel. And now even our managers, our scrum masters are using it.

How has it helped my organization?

CloudGuard makes the management of our security controls in AWS more transparent. 

What is most valuable?

The dashboard is intuitive. You know if you're compliant or not, and then it gives you a remediation plan.

What needs improvement?

CloudGuard could be more customizable. It has built-in standards for things like GDPR compliance. But depending on your business lane, you might want to build your own controls based on your own standards. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using CloudGuard Posture Management for at least six months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

CloudGuard is pretty stable. It's rock-solid.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

In terms of scalability, CloudGuard requires a little bit of work. Sometimes it does take longer for the checks to come through, but it depends on how busy you are in the cloud. 

How are customer service and support?

Check Point tech support in North America is pretty good.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We really liked this other solution offered by a smaller company, and then a larger company bought it. I forgot the company's name, but the roadmap just went to pieces when it was bought out. All the tech people left the company then the chief technical officer resigned. It was terrible.

How was the initial setup?

Setting up CloudGuard is pretty straightforward. The initial setup only took a few minutes. It's essentially turnkey. However, the total deployment took about half a day. For maintenance, we have two cloud administrators. That's two in case one goes on vacation, resigns, or gets sick. So you need backup.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The license for CloudGuard Posture Management is about $80 a year, and it's based on your cloud footprint, not the number of users. So you could have a million users, and it doesn't matter. 

What other advice do I have?

I rate CloudGuard Posture Management seven out of 10. I would rate it higher, but I think the price point is pretty high for what it does. However, I know it's a burgeoning market. So I think the price point and some of the other features that I already mentioned, like customization, are pretty lacking. Still, if you want some cover for an internal or external audit, this is a tool for you. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Mantu Shaw - PeerSpot reviewer
Project Manager at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
MSP
Top 5
Helpful technical support, with a seamless setup and good integration with the public cloud
Pros and Cons
  • "Auto remediation is a very effective feature that helps ensure less manual intervention."
  • "Almost all features are good, however, they still require improvements to the code security portion on which integration with the major source code repository is required."

What is our primary use case?

The product provides complete visibility of our cloud security posture. It supports servers and Cloud-Native Services. It provides a centralized solution for Cloud Security with risk and compliance management. 

We required it to manage various compliance requirements including live ISO, SOC, PCI and it supports everything. Our Organization is in a hybrid structure and in it, we are using various AWS and Azure accounts. Earlier, we managed everything individually, however, after the implementation of it, we now manage everything from a single solution. The single solution helps with the system, network, and security administration.

How has it helped my organization?

The solution provides the complete visibility of Cloud Security, as well as a number of baseline policies and rules. This helps us to manage cloud posture with less effort. After implementation, it reduced administrative effort in terms of managed security over the cloud. Now, we are not dependent on individual tools for each account as well as cloud service providers. 

After implementation, the team can generate reports from a single console for all compliance needs.

Auto Remediation is a very effective feature and it improves the need for manual intervention from the security and cloud administrator.

What is most valuable?

The baseline policy and the integration with the public cloud are very easy.

The number of compliance rulesets along with the baseline policy, support of cloud-native services, and license management are easy. Support of the CI/CD pipeline security (Code Security), Kubernetes, et cetera, is useful. 

There are very helpful and various types of reports. Reporting features are very good and anyone from the compliance team can view/generate a report according to compliance support.

Auto remediation is a very effective feature that helps ensure less manual intervention.

Support of AWS Lamda and Azure Functions helps for any potential breaches.

What needs improvement?

Almost all features are good, however, they still require improvements to the code security portion on which integration with the major source code repository is required.

Integration with CI/CD is an important aspect as it is needed to secure the environment. Having it will help a lot.

Integration with Docker is also a key feature that needs some improvements.

Integration with other third parties and with SIEM is an important aspect that should be addressed.

Currently, it provides integration with Tenable, but it would be good if it had support other VAPT software as well.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using Check Point CloudGuard Posture management for the last 8+ months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is very stable and we have not found any gaps. It provides seamless integration with the public cloud.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It's a highly scalable solution and integration with the public cloud is very good. The way you can centralize the dashboard of entire cloud infra is a very impressive.

How are customer service and support?

Support has been good. We implement it with the help of OEM support and whenever we've required help we've received a good response.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Earlier, we tested other tools as well, however, the features which were available via Check Point are very good and the future roadmap is also very good in regards to cloud security.

How was the initial setup?

The setup is straightforward and seamless.

What about the implementation team?

We implemented it with help of Check Point support. The rest was managed by our internal team as it's easy to handle.

What was our ROI?

Security is very important and gives us ROI from security itself. We also get an ROI as we have less administrative effort. We can see an ROI with the compliance and risk management on offer too.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The setup cost is very affordable and very easy. Integration with the public cloud is very easy. The licensing calculation is also very good and no manual effort is required.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We evaluated other tools like Rapid7, Qualys, and AWS native security tools, as well as Azure native security tools.

What other advice do I have?

It's a very strong solution for cloud security posture management and very effective for large and mid-size environments. Any organization moving towards the cloud would benefit from this.  

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: November 2025
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.