We primarily use this product for cloud computing security. It is an integration platform for IPS and I also use it for performance monitoring.
I also coach classes on the use of this firewall, which is installed on my personal laptop.
We primarily use this product for cloud computing security. It is an integration platform for IPS and I also use it for performance monitoring.
I also coach classes on the use of this firewall, which is installed on my personal laptop.
This product is more secure than other firewalls, such as FortiGate.
The information stored in the logs is very descriptive and includes a lot of details.
The dynamic port features are better when compared to other firewalls.
This firewall is difficult to manage and use when you first begin using it. However, once you are used to it, the interface is comfortable and easy to use.
The Smart Control feature is hard to install.
In the future, I would like to see more features in the unified security management platform.
This is a reliable firewall.
Scalability is not an issue with Check Point.
Technical support from Check Point is good.
I have experience with other firewalls including FortiGate. Check Point is more secure, although it is more difficult to deploy and configure.
Until you have some experience, the installation and configuration are difficult.
The licensing fees are paid on a monthly basis and I am happy with the pricing.
Check Point is responsible for inventing several firewall security features.
In summary, this is a good product and I recommend it because it the most secure firewall on the market.
I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.
My primary use case of this solution is for the data center in the perimeter security. We configure all of our security features like anti-boot, antivirus, and filtering.
I think the most valuable feature is that the application and configuration were easy for us. When we need to do some work with the networks, configuration and deploying are easy - if I want to search for information, it is easy in the Check Point platform.
I think the price of this product could be improved - other solutions are cheaper in comparison. In the next release, I would like to be able to perform sandboxing to check email attachments and information sent through the cloud for viruses.
I think this solution is stable.
My impression is that the solution is scalable.
I implemented using a vendor team, whose performance was good.
I considered using Cisco before deciding on Check Point.
Check Point is easy for the configuration user. I would rate this solution as eight out of ten.
We primarily use the solution for security.
Check Point NGFW is a stable and user-friendly solution. It has increased the security level and stability within our organization. With the ATP solution, it works and is fully competent. It can catch many zero-day attacks and it fits NGFW well,
The most valuable features are IPS and Antivirus.
The Blades work fine and the performance optimization is great.
In some features, it is not easy to use the Check Point firewall.
The IPSEC VPN setup is not easy to configure. In some cases, if the VPN is not established, it is very hard to troubleshoot the configuration. It does not address the problem well.
The upgrading process takes too much time.
I've used the solution for seven years.
The stability is very good. I would rate it at a nine out of ten.
The solution is scalable. I'd rate it at a nine out of ten.
In most cases, they answer our ticket in one day. They are willing to solve the problems at hand.
The initial setup is not easy, however, it is also not very complex. We have to use both the Gaia and smart console interface and it should be checked for some conf from the CLI.
We did and their expertise was high. We did not face many problems.
It is our next-generation firewall and IPS.
We had some security issues that WatchGuard could not resolve. Since installing Check Point, we have not had any troubles. We don't have any security problems anymore.
Also, as we are systems integrators, we could not offer only one brand to our customers. We had to expand to several solutions to enable customers to make their own decisions.
It's a gateway and we can integrate some of their functionalities. It's a gateway for us to work with them. Compared to the previous solution we had - WatchGuard - Check Point really works.
We looked very closely at ArcSight's solution because it's a multi-vendor solution. With ArcSight we could have Check Point, we could have RSA, we could have any brand and integrate several brands, from a security point of view. With Check Point, you cannot do so, you can integrate with Check Point products. Check Point forces the customer to buy only one vendor's solution but the trends of the market are not to work with only one vendor. If Check Point could work with other vendor solutions, that would an improvement.
It would also help if they had solutions for the SMB market. Check Point is only useful for customers that have a big IT budget. If they don't have the IT budget, the customer has to buy a solution that from another vendor.
For the last 10 or 12 years, Check Point has been at the top of the industry ratings, so this demonstrates they make good products. The stability is really good.
Technical support is really good. We work with a partner from Check Point, a very good partner. The time of response is very good. We are satisfied with the solutions that Check Point has provided us.
Before using Check Point we were using WatchGuard, but it was not a good brand. Support from them was very difficult. We decided on Check Point because, first of all, their salespeople did a good job. In addition, their position in the market helped us decide to buy. Also, we are systems integrators and many of our customers use Check Point. Their feedback helped us make the decision to go with Check Point.
An important criterion when selecting a vendor is that the vendor has to provide support here in Peru. Our experience with WatchGuard not having a local representative was that the support was not good in terms of time of response as well as difficulties with the idioms of the language. We speak Spanish and the support was only in English, so it was difficult.
I'm not part of the technical staff. But from what I heard, the setup was fine. I believe the installation and deployment were without any problems.
Check Point solutions are very expensive here. It's good, but it's expensive.
Some vendors offer a PoC. When you do a PoC you can more easily see which is the better solution. We would recommend requiring a PoC.
I would rate Check Point an eight out of 10. They're not a 10 because of their pricing.
We use the product as a firewall solution for application control, defined rules and policies, and insights features.
The platform helps our organization to save working hours.
Check Point NGFW is easy to configure.
The product's technical support services need improvement.
We have been using Check Point NGFW for two years.
It is a stable product.
It is a scalable platform.
The technical support team could include skilled engineers to understand the issues and respond.
Neutral
We have used Fortigate before. In comparison, Check Point NGFW provides a more detailed configuration.
The initial setup is easy and takes 20 minutes to complete.
The product provides value for pricing in terms of performance and technical features compared to other firewalls.
I recommend Check Point NGFW and rate it a nine out of ten.
Check Point has strong security features as well as some decent monitoring and management capabilities.
My customers complain that the interface isn't user-friendly.
I have been using Check Point for eight years.
Check Point stable. I've had no problems.
Check Point is scalable.
Check Point support is good.
Check Point's setup process isn't very user-friendly.
Check Point is a little more expensive than FortiGate.
I rate Check Point nine out of 10. I work with both Check Point and FortiGate. Each has its advantages and disadvantages. Check Point is more secure than FortiGate. However, Fortigate is more affordable and user-friendly. FortiGate offers seamless solutions to customers, so If they want a solution that's easy to use, they go with FortiGate.
We are using the new version of Check Point NGFW.
We use the solution for web page protection to provide the security service which is lacking in Bolivia, a poverty ridden country.
I like the facility of the product configuration. The ease with which the solution can be put into production makes it easy for my employers and for me to provide client support.
The interface could be better. There is much equipment that is involved in the monitoring of many clients in a single interface.
With other platforms, such as WatchGuard, it is very simple to manage four, five or six of these. We are talking about a lot of clients. The platforms for doing monitoring should be addressed.
The solution boasts good stability.
The solution boasts good scalability.
I have not had need to make use of technical support.
The initial setup is easy.
When it comes to the deployment and maintenance, there are two people involved, one for the deployment and the other for monitoring, consisting of an engineer and a technician.
I feel that the clients are very satisfied with the product.
I don't have any particular advice when it comes to the deployment process. This will depend on the client's needs.
I rate Check Point NGFW as an eight out of ten.
I have certain customers who make use of the solution for providing security in respect of internet access. I am aware only of the solution acting as a firewall.
My customers cite performance and ease of configuration as two of the solution's most valuable features.
The price is middling. It's much more expensive than Fortinet, although not so expensive when compared with Palo Alto.
The solution is significantly more expensive than Fortinet, although this holds true to a lesser extent when compared with Palo Alto.
The solution is significantly more expensive than Fortinet, although this holds true to a lesser degree when compared with Palo Alto.
I do not have much familiarity with Check Point NGFW, although I do have several customers who make use of it. I can mainly comment based on what I have come across in user reviews in magazines.
I know the solution to be one of the top players in the world at the moment.
As Check Point NGFW does not compare favorably price-wise with Fortinet, I am inclined to deduct a point from its rating and rate it as a nine out of ten.