Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

A10 Networks Thunder CGN vs Nokia Virtualized Service Router comparison

 

Categories and Ranking

A10 Networks Thunder CGN
Ranking in Carrier Grade Network Address Translation
1st
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Nokia Virtualized Service R...
Ranking in Carrier Grade Network Address Translation
4th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Carrier Grade Network Address Translation category, the mindshare of A10 Networks Thunder CGN is 34.2%, down from 39.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nokia Virtualized Service Router is 6.9%, up from 6.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Carrier Grade Network Address Translation
 

Featured Reviews

BB
Extremely reliable; freeing up a lot of our IP space
We use the fixed NAT feature. Students sometimes download copyrighted material which they're not supposed to, or do things they're not supposed to, then we need to be able to track back who was the user. Because it's on a NAT, we need a way to be able to bind the inside and outside addresses. This is why we use it. It is very easy to use. Both the GUI and CLI interface are consistent, which makes the ease of access throughout various constituencies possible. It's also well-documented and logical. These are the things that I look for the most in ease of use.
Use Nokia Virtualized Service Router?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Carrier Grade Network Address Translation solutions are best for your needs.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Leucom Group
Information Not Available