Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Actian NoSQL Object Database vs Objectivity DB comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Actian NoSQL Object Database
Ranking in Non-Relational Databases
4th
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Objectivity DB
Ranking in Non-Relational Databases
8th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Non-Relational Databases category, the mindshare of Actian NoSQL Object Database is 11.5%, up from 9.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Objectivity DB is 5.2%, down from 6.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Non-Relational Databases
 

Featured Reviews

Lakshmi Narayanan  Duraisamy - PeerSpot reviewer
User-friendly, easy to maintain and open source; lacks a dedicated UI-based interface
The solution currently lacks a dedicated UI-based interface. We currently have to rely on third-party clients to manage the database and connect remotely with SQL. Unfortunately, NoSQL doesn't have any performance-specific features like dashboard metrics that you find in Oracle. A performance report feature would be helpful to us if they would include it in the next release.
Use Objectivity DB?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Non-Relational Databases solutions are best for your needs.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Also Known As

Versant ODBMS
Objectivity/DB
 

Learn More

Video not available
Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Pediatrix Medical Group, Pinnergy, The Rohatyn Group, Henry Schein, Groupe Adeo, Zoho, TimoCom, Xactly
CGG, Dr_gerwerk, Siemens
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, Actian and others in Non-Relational Databases. Updated: December 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.