Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs IBM Engineering Test Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Users find Adaptavist Test Management for Jira user-friendly with helpful resources, but some suggest quicker support response times.
No sentiment score available
IBM Engineering Test Management's customer support is praised for responsiveness and effectiveness, with improvements in response times and satisfactory experiences.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
5.9
Users want better integration, faster test creation, improved customization, AI enhancements, third-party tool connectivity, and accurate tagging in Adaptavist Test Management.
Sentiment score
6.2
IBM Engineering Test Management requires a user-friendly interface, enhanced usability, data handling, hierarchical structuring, and seamless integration with automated pipelines.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Users find Adaptavist Test Management for Jira scalable, though some see room for improvement in handling diverse test cases and integrations.
Sentiment score
7.5
IBM Engineering Test Management scales smoothly for large organizations with thousands of users and test cases, including automated ones.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Adaptavist Test Management for Jira is affordable, integrates well with Jira, and offers robust and scalable features for various business sizes.
No sentiment score available
<p>IBM Engineering Test Management provides robust features and customization with flexible pricing, ideal for large enterprises needing comprehensive test management.</p>
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.9
Users praise Adaptavist Test Management's stability, though some face issues with KPI insights, resulting in varied stability ratings.
No sentiment score available
IBM Engineering Test Management is reliable and stable, with good performance but occasionally impacted by server configuration and database space issues.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.5
Adaptavist Test Management for Jira offers integration, reuse, comprehensive test repository, automation, risk management, reporting, real-time tracking, and a proactive dashboard.
Sentiment score
8.5
IBM Engineering Test Management is praised for fast, reliable customizable workflows, and robust integrations, particularly in testing and tracking functionality.
 

Categories and Ranking

Adaptavist Test Management ...
Ranking in Test Management Tools
9th
Average Rating
7.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
IBM Engineering Test Manage...
Ranking in Test Management Tools
8th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
Load Testing Tools (15th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of Adaptavist Test Management for Jira is 3.3%, down from 3.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Engineering Test Management is 2.9%, up from 2.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Management Tools
 

Featured Reviews

RS
Has dashboard and reporting features that help us identify and address red flags
I would like to see some improvements in Adaptive Test Management for Jira. First, having a recommendation engine or feature that guides handling risks more intuitively rather than relying on manual processes would be helpful. Second, enhancing the connectivity with third-party tools like Teams or Slack would be valuable. One challenge with integrating Adaptavist Test Management for Jira into workflows is ensuring it accurately tags and incorporates all relevant stories and epics. Sometimes, it’s unclear if the tool considers all dependencies and backlog items, which can affect how risks are assessed. However, it sometimes seems to miss this high-level perspective, which can be a limitation based on how the product is designed. This has been a concern for those who use it regularly, although I don’t manage these aspects personally.
HZ
Scalable and Stable solution with good integration function and support team
IBM Rational has the RFT, which is rational functional testing. We do test automation with rational functional testing. So after we do that, we can put in all the code, then I can build it, then put all the test cases, and put all the build code for the shared location. And then rational that shared location means that RQM has access to the shared location. So, when we execute, if a test case is automated, we can run it from RQM. We need to have the environment ready for it to execute. Once we have that, then we can select the task case. So, by clicking on one button, the other environment is automatically plugged in. Then test results will be automatically transferred back to our RQM. So, in RQM, we can view it, and it is integrated. So we can run the test and the automation from RQM, and the test results will come back. Azure DevOps first test case is there, but then we tried to use Selenium to do half automation. Still, we realized that it wouldn't have the integration. We could do something in the pipeline, but it fires the Selenium test automation code. But then the test results won't be brought back or added to AzureDesk DevOps. That's something that I do hope that there can be another other system that can have this kind of integration. RQM can be improved because it's not related to our server and could be faster. We need to find out how much database storage is needed and keep increasing it. We heard that the latest version of RQM can clean up some old ones and give the same test result. But that one feature we are yet to use. It's a setting that we can set up, and then it goes automatically or gives me the choice to do it manually.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
35%
Computer Software Company
22%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Energy/Utilities Company
5%
Healthcare Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
13%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Adaptavist Test Management for Jira?
The tool's pricing is a bit expensive, considering the kind of risk analysis and visibility we want, given that it's built on top of the Jira platform and other Atlassian products. It's priced slig...
What needs improvement with Adaptavist Test Management for Jira?
I would like to see some improvements in Adaptive Test Management for Jira. First, having a recommendation engine or feature that guides handling risks more intuitively rather than relying on manua...
What do you like most about IBM Rational Quality Manager?
The one feature that has not allowed us to switch to any other solution is the integration with functional testing.
What needs improvement with IBM Rational Quality Manager?
IBM Rational has the RFT, which is rational functional testing. We do test automation with rational functional testing. So after we do that, we can put in all the code, then I can build it, then pu...
What is your primary use case for IBM Rational Quality Manager?
We create test cases, and then we need to plan a new task plan feature from the existing task case file and execute the test results, which will be saved in RQM. So that is how we are using the too...
 

Also Known As

No data available
IBM Rational Quality Manager, Rational Quality Manager
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

IBM, John Lewis, Trip Advisor, Netgear,  Bill and Melinda Gates foundation, Sapient
Ehrhardt, Cisco Systems, Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik, CareCore National, ItaÒ BBA, Barr
Find out what your peers are saying about Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs. IBM Engineering Test Management and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.