Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs IBM Rational Performance Tester comparison

Adaptavist and IBM are both solutions in the Test Management Tools category. Adaptavist is ranked #10 with an average rating of 6.5, while IBM is ranked #24. Adaptavist holds a 2.7% mindshare in TMT, compared to IBM’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of Adaptavist users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of IBM users who would recommend it.
Adaptavist Test Management ...
Read 5 Adaptavist Test Management for Jira reviews
  • 329 Views
  • 224 Comparison Views
83% willing to recommend
IBM Rational Performance Te...
Read 17 IBM Rational Performance Tester reviews
  • 110 Views
  • 84 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

IBM Rational Performance Tester and Adaptavist Test Management for Jira are two leading testing tools. User reviews indicate Adaptavist often surpasses due to its feature-rich offerings and seamless Jira integration, making it worth the investment despite higher prices.

Features: IBM Rational Performance Tester is noted for comprehensive load and stress testing capabilities, enabling users to simulate real-life scenarios effectively. Adaptavist Test Management for Jira is highlighted for its strong integration with Jira, scalability, and rich feature set, easing test management within the Jira environment. Users generally prefer Adaptavist's broader feature set tailored to contemporary Agile practices.

Room for Improvement: IBM Rational Performance Tester users suggest enhancing scalability and simplifying complex configurations. Adaptavist Test Management for Jira users call for improved reporting functionalities and more intuitive navigation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Rational Performance Tester receives positive comments for a stable deployment process but occasionally faces criticism regarding its learning curve. Adaptavist Test Management for Jira benefits from straightforward deployment and strong customer support, making it a favorite among users who prioritize quick and easy implementation.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Rational Performance Tester is seen as having a steep price point, though users acknowledge its potential ROI if fully utilized. Adaptavist Test Management for Jira is also premium priced but is perceived by many as offering good value due to its Jira integration. Users typically report better ROI with Adaptavist, justifying its cost through enhanced productivity and efficiency gains.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs. IBM Rational Performance Tester Report (Updated: March 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs. IBM Rational Performance Tester
March 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Adaptavist Test Management ...
Ranking in Test Management Tools
10th
Average Rating
7.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
IBM Rational Performance Te...
Ranking in Test Management Tools
24th
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of Adaptavist Test Management for Jira is 2.7%, down from 3.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Rational Performance Tester is 1.4%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Management Tools
 

Featured Reviews

RS
Has dashboard and reporting features that help us identify and address red flags
I would like to see some improvements in Adaptive Test Management for Jira. First, having a recommendation engine or feature that guides handling risks more intuitively rather than relying on manual processes would be helpful. Second, enhancing the connectivity with third-party tools like Teams or Slack would be valuable. One challenge with integrating Adaptavist Test Management for Jira into workflows is ensuring it accurately tags and incorporates all relevant stories and epics. Sometimes, it’s unclear if the tool considers all dependencies and backlog items, which can affect how risks are assessed. However, it sometimes seems to miss this high-level perspective, which can be a limitation based on how the product is designed. This has been a concern for those who use it regularly, although I don’t manage these aspects personally.
Read full review
it_user323943 - PeerSpot reviewer
We can edit captured transactions and organize them by those for which we require performance metrics, but it lacks a set of manuals or guides that would take out some guess work.
It is used to capture and generate HTTP tests. The capture process is very easy. After this, we edited the captured transactions to organize them into the sections or transactions we require performance metrics for (i.e. splash page, user authentication, main pageload, logout, etc.). This editing process is easy to perform with the interface provided in Rational Performance Tester Finally, Rational Performance Tester has an import/export feature that has been extremely useful. We have used it to export our complete test library and import it into another Rational Performance Tester server with no loss or issues. This allows for platform test migrations and backup.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"You can group test cases together and track the execution of them."
"Our software development process primarily uses Adaptive Test Management for Jira to monitor real-time risks across all stories and sprint planning. Additionally, we use it to create action plans for high-priority risks."
"We don't use technical support. We have an office in Austria that provides us with solutions. Also, this solution is pretty simple and user-friendly. We don't really need help with it."
"The program is very stable and scalable."
"It is a scalable solution."
"Technical support is very good. I'm very satisfied with the assistance we've received so far."
"It can support both web applications and mobile applications, and in certain cases, it can also support testing of desktop applications or software-based applications. You can write web applications, mobile applications, and software-based applications."
 

Cons

"They should work on integrating the solution with AI."
"Lacking visual gadgets that go on a dashboard, pie charts, bar charts and histograms."
"I would like to see some improvements in Adaptive Test Management for Jira. First, having a recommendation engine or feature that guides handling risks more intuitively rather than relying on manual processes would be helpful. Second, enhancing the connectivity with third-party tools like Teams or Slack would be valuable."
"I don't like that you need to use a lot of tabs. One test case takes 15-20 minutes and on Zephyr is take about 5-10 minutes."
"There are some features that Micro Focus LoadRunner provides, but they are not available in IBM Rational Performance Tester. They should include such features. It can also have more reports similar to what HP provides. It might also need some improvement in terms of the tools and support for other technology areas. Certain technologies are not supported by every tool. They need to support all sorts of technologies and platforms on which web applications and mobile applications are built. They need complete support for all sorts of technologies."
"The solution is not easily scalable. If you want to extend the solution, you need to purchase a different kind of license. You also have to work with the IBM team to assist in scaling."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's pricing is a bit expensive, considering the kind of risk analysis and visibility we want, given that it's built on top of the Jira platform and other Atlassian products. It's priced slightly higher than similar products, maybe five to ten percent more."
"The licensing is rather expensive for those that have many users."
"It is much cheaper than Micro Focus LoadRunner. We need perpetual licenses. Support is included in the first sale. After that, you need to renew support every year."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
38%
Computer Software Company
26%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Insurance Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
30%
Computer Software Company
20%
Government
13%
Real Estate/Law Firm
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Adaptavist Test Management for Jira?
It is a scalable solution.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Adaptavist Test Management for Jira?
The tool's pricing is a bit expensive, considering the kind of risk analysis and visibility we want, given that it's built on top of the Jira platform and other Atlassian products. It's priced slig...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Adaptavist Test Management for Jira?
I would like to see some improvements in Adaptive Test Management for Jira. First, having a recommendation engine or feature that guides handling risks more intuitively rather than relying on manua...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs Adaptavist Test Management for Jira Logo
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs Adaptavist Test Management for Jira
Compared 39% of the time
Tricentis Tosca vs Adaptavist Test Management for Jira Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs Adaptavist Test Management for Jira
Compared 38% of the time
Zephyr Enterprise vs Adaptavist Test Management for Jira Logo
Zephyr Enterprise vs Adaptavist Test Management for Jira
Compared 23% of the time
More Adaptavist Test Management for Jira Competitors
Apache JMeter vs IBM Rational Performance Tester Logo
Apache JMeter vs IBM Rational Performance Tester
Compared 63% of the time
OpenText LoadRunner Professional vs IBM Rational Performance Tester Logo
OpenText LoadRunner Professional vs IBM Rational Performance Tester
Compared 24% of the time
Tricentis NeoLoad vs IBM Rational Performance Tester Logo
Tricentis NeoLoad vs IBM Rational Performance Tester
Compared 14% of the time
More IBM Rational Performance Tester Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Adaptavist Test Management for Jira
March 2025
Adaptavist Test Management for Jira reportDownload Adaptavist Test Management for Jira product report
Buyer's Guide
IBM Rational Performance Tester
March 2025
IBM Rational Performance Tester reportDownload IBM Rational Performance Tester product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Rational Performance Tester
 

Overview

Adaptavist Test Management for Jira is the full, featured, enterprise ready test management solution directly in Jira. It offers full traceability across issues, requirements, test cases, and execution. The tool allows for flexibility and customisation for test plans and runs. It offers a free and flexible REST API, includes the ability to automate bulk tests, and enables seamless integration with most continuous integration tools. The in-depth reporting capability gives users the ability to analyse and share test data results between development and business teams. It’s the single source of truth to track, manage and optimise your whole test lifecycle right inside Jira software.

Try it now https://marketplace.atlassian....

See the overview video

Benefits:

  • Drive reusability across Jira with cross-project hierarchical repositories for all test assets 
  • Improve collaboration with flexible workflows between traditional and Agile development teams
  • Enhance coverage with end-to-end traceability across all test artifacts
  • Eliminate duplication to increase efficiency with versioning, test data parameters and shared step features
  • Improve visibility and functionality with 70 cross-project reports and gadgets
  • Reduce management time and effort, with rich APIs for integration with test automation and DevOps tools
  • Allows teams to seamlessly collaborate and manage multiple versions of test cases in parallel while providing an audit history of changes

Features:

  • Easy drag and drop organisation, planning and execution 
  • Hierarchical folders to manage and reuse assets across Jira projects, releases and sprints
  • Test case libraries including versioning, shared steps and test data parameters
  • Test plans and runs to manage and track test execution cycles
  • Full traceability of test cases, requirements, test execution results and defects
  • 70 cross-project reports, gadgets and Confluence Macros to track the coverage of your tests with advanced cross project reporting
  • Global and project level settings for customisation and standardisation
  • Custom fields for test cases, test steps, test plans and test runs
  • Migration function to import test cases from files or legacy test management tools
  • REST APIs for integration with test automation and DevOp tools

Use Cases:

  • Integrate CI tools such as Jenkins, Bamboo, Travis CI or other development applications like Github, Bitbucket, Datadog via the REST API for end-to-end integration across test case management, execution, and reporting
  • Automate testing at scale, whilst maintaining traceability inside Jira. Scaled to 10,000+ tests across multiple configurations, publishing results in Jira in under 30 minutes
  • Increase efficiency by significantly reducing time spent on test case specification and management
  • Benefit from reusability across Jira projects and single points of maintenance when reusing and organizing test cases
  • Improved visibility of software testing process and quality with 70 out-of-the-box reports, including real-time dashboards
  • Clear end-to-end traceability of requirements, tests, and defects ensuring that the delivered software meets requirements.














Adaptavist
IBM Rational Performance Tester is a performance testing solution that validates the scalability of web and server applications. Rational Performance Tester identifies the presence and cause of system performance bottlenecks and reduces load testing complexity.
IBM
 

Sample Customers

IBM, John Lewis, Trip Advisor, Netgear,  Bill and Melinda Gates foundation, Sapient
andagon, Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon
Buyer's Guide
Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs. IBM Rational Performance Tester
March 2025
Free Report: Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs. IBM Rational Performance Tester
Find out what your peers are saying about Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs. IBM Rational Performance Tester and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs. IBM Rational Performance Tester report.
See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.