Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Airkit vs Microsoft Power Apps comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 29, 2024
 

Categories and Ranking

Airkit
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Customer Experience Management (55th), eCommerce Platforms (72nd)
Microsoft Power Apps
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
90
Ranking in other categories
Rapid Application Development Software (1st), Low-Code Development Platforms (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

Airkit and Microsoft Power Apps aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Airkit is designed for Customer Experience Management and holds a mindshare of 0.5%, down 0.7% compared to last year.
Microsoft Power Apps, on the other hand, focuses on Rapid Application Development Software, holds 17.7% mindshare, down 24.0% since last year.
Customer Experience Management
Rapid Application Development Software
 

Featured Reviews

Praveen Chaudhary - PeerSpot reviewer
May 30, 2024
Facilitates form creation and application planning but lacks performance
We have started exploring those parts. It is in the initial stages and capable of performing simple tasks that are helpful. We are still exploring how it can work with profiles, and other AI features that Microsoft continues to introduce. It provides a basic starting point within its capabilities. Microsoft Power Apps is a perfect tool. Understanding its limitations is crucial to identifying where it best fits within organizational solutions. It excels in scenarios requiring quick turnaround times, offering easy maintenance with minimal technical expertise needed. However, it's not suited for complex enterprise-level solutions. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The product is inexpensive."
"The cost for licensing could be lower."
"I pay nine dollars monthly for the subscription to this solution and the price of the is reasonable."
"If we compare Microsoft Power Apps with any on-prem or other Azure solutions, I feel it can be made cheaper."
"The pricing is complicated to understand."
"Microsoft Power Apps is not an expensive solution."
"It is not expensive. There is no licensing cost."
"The price of Microsoft PowerApps is reasonable compared to other solutions."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Customer Experience Management solutions are best for your needs.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
12%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
How would you choose between Microsoft PowerApps and Salesforce Platform?
I think it depends on your use case. If your organization uses Microsoft Enterprise products, PowerApps will work better in your environment. Similarly, if you have a Salesforce integration in pla...
Would you choose ServiceNow over Microsoft PowerApps?
Hi Netanya, I will choose ServiceNow because ServiceNow is a very good tool compared to Microsoft PowerApp. Because ServiceNow has a very strong module (Performance Analysis) reporting which will ...
Would you choose Microsoft Azure App Service or PowerApps?
Microsoft Azure App Service is helpful if you need to set up temporary servers for customers to run their programs in locations that other cloud providers do not cater to. When servers are closer t...
 

Also Known As

No data available
PowerApps, MS PowerApps
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
TransAlta, Rackspace, Telstra
Find out what your peers are saying about Qualtrics, ServiceNow, Teradata and others in Customer Experience Management. Updated: November 2024.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.