Aiven Platform vs Spring Cloud Data Flow comparison

Aiven and VMware are both solutions in the Streaming Analytics category. Aiven is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.0, while VMware is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.6. Aiven holds a 1.4% mindshare in SA, compared to VMware’s 5.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Aiven users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of VMware users who would recommend it.

Aiven Platform

Read 1 Aiven Platform review

1,329 Views
618 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Spring Cloud Data Flow

Read 9 Spring Cloud Data Flow reviews

2,743 Views
2,051 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Aiven Platform

Spring Cloud Data Flow

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Aiven Platform and Spring Cloud Data Flow based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Databricks, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Confluent and others in Streaming Analytics.

To learn more, read our detailed Streaming Analytics Report (Updated: November 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Streaming Analytics

November 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 816,406 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Aiven Platform

Ranking in Streaming Analytics

13th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Spring Cloud Data Flow

Ranking in Streaming Analytics

10th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (22nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Streaming Analytics category, the mindshare of Aiven Platform is 1.4%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Spring Cloud Data Flow is 5.0%, up from 4.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Streaming Analytics

Featured Reviews

reviewer2539719

System Engineer - Cloud Platform at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Faster and easier to use with less maintenance

We haven't had any significant issues so far. Our manager can escalate issues to the solution's engineers even when we have issues. They provide a fast response to our incidents and solve our issues. After solving the problem, the engineers also look into the issue to find the root cause. We've contacted their support before. We submit support tickets and follow up with our account manager. The account manager can then follow up with the engineers, which helps the ticket get processed faster. Their support team has several experts, especially in Apache Kafka. We can always ask them about specific issues. For example, our principal engineer once asked about Kafka offset, and the account manager was able to handle it and provide best practices.

Read full review

NitinGoyal

Engineering Lead at Naukri.com

Has a plug-and-play model and provides good robustness and scalability

The solution's community support could be improved. I don't know why the Spring Cloud Data Flow community is not very strong. Community support is very limited whenever you face any problem or are stuck somewhere. I'm not sure whether it has improved in the last six months because this pipeline was set up almost two years ago. I struggled with that a lot. For example, there was limited support whenever I got an exception and sought help from Stack Overflow or different forums. Interacting with Kubernetes needs a few certificates. You need to define all the certificates within your application. With the help of those certificates, your Java application or Spring Cloud Data Flow can interact with Kubernetes. I faced a lot of hurdles while placing those certificates. Despite following the official documentation to define all the replicas, readiness, and liveliness probes within the Spring Cloud Data Flow application, it was not working. So, I had to troubleshoot while digging in and debugging the internals of Spring Cloud Data Flow at that time. It was just a configuration mismatch, and I was doing nothing weird. There was a small spelling difference between how Spring Cloud Data Flow was expecting it and how I passed it. I was just following the official documentation.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What I like best about the tool is that the process for the services is faster compared to other methods. It's easier to use because Aiven for Apache Kafka handles the maintenance, so we have less to manage. We only use Kafka to manage its connectivity."

"The most valuable features of Spring Cloud Data Flow are the simple programming model, integration, dependency Injection, and ability to do any injection. Additionally, auto-configuration is another important feature because we don't have to configure the database and or set up the boilerplate in the database in every project. The composability is good, we can create small workloads and compose them in any way we like."

"The most valuable feature is real-time streaming."

"The dashboards in Spring Cloud Dataflow are quite valuable."

"The best thing I like about Spring Cloud Data Flow is its plug-and-play model."

"There are a lot of options in Spring Cloud. It's flexible in terms of how we can use it. It's a full infrastructure."

"The solution's most valuable feature is that it allows us to use different batch data sources, retrieve the data, and then do the data processing, after which we can convert and store it in the target."

"The product is very user-friendly."

"The ease of deployment on Kubernetes, the seamless integration for orchestration of various pipelines, and the visual dashboard that simplifies operations even for non-specialists such as quality analysts."

Cons

"One challenge we face is when we want to update the version, for example, from 3.6 to 3.7. It will spawn new nodes, and then there's rebalancing and syncing from other brokers. There's high CPU usage during this process, so the solution can't be used for a while, causing some downtime in our services. To tackle this challenge, we schedule maintenance updates during low-traffic periods when there's less risk and fewer users use the services."

"Some of the features, like the monitoring tools, are not very mature and are still evolving."

"On the tool's online discussion forums, you may get stuck with an issue, making it an area where improvements are required."

"I would improve the dashboard features as they are not very user-friendly."

"Spring Cloud Data Flow could improve the user interface. We can drag and drop in the application for the configuration and settings, and deploy it right from the UI, without having to run a CI/CD pipeline. However, that does not work with Kubernetes, it only works when we are working with jars as the Spring Cloud Data Flow applications."

"Spring Cloud Data Flow is not an easy-to-use tool, so improvements are required."

"There were instances of deployment pipelines getting stuck, and the dashboard not always accurately showing the application status, requiring manual intervention such as rerunning applications or refreshing the dashboard."

"The solution's community support could be improved."

"The configurations could be better. Some configurations are a little bit time-consuming in terms of trying to understand using the Spring Cloud documentation."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The solution provides value for money, and we are currently using its community edition."

"This is an open-source product that can be used free of charge."

"If you want support from Spring Cloud Data Flow there is a fee. The Spring Framework is open-source and this is a free solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Streaming Analytics solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

23%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

28%

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Aiven for Apache Kafka?

One challenge we face is when we want to update the version, for example, from 3.6 to 3.7. It will spawn new nodes, and then there's rebalancing and syncing from other brokers. There's high CPU usa...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Aiven for Apache Kafka?

I use Aiven for Apache Kafka to handle services dependent on each other. Instead of API calls, we use it for asynchronous processing of all our services. That's the general way we use it.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Aiven for Apache Kafka?

Apache Kafka is really good for streaming data or messaging services. It's comparable to other messaging services. Overall, I'd rate Aiven for Apache Kafka an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Spring Cloud Data Flow?

I would improve the dashboard features as they are not very user-friendly. Another area for improvement is the documentation, as it is not very precise. There are limited resources available on Spr...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Spring Cloud Data Flow?

I am a developer using Spring Cloud Dataflow. We primarily use it to convert our applications from monolithic to microservices. The solution is used for scheduling tasks in a specific order and ens...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Spring Cloud Data Flow?

My advice would be to thoroughly review the documentation and understand if Spring Cloud Dataflow is the right solution for your application. For applications with only one or two microservices, it...

See all answers

Comparisons

Confluent vs Aiven Platform

Compared 51% of the time

Amazon MSK vs Aiven Platform

Compared 26% of the time

Instaclustr vs Aiven Platform

Compared 14% of the time

Talend Data Streams vs Aiven Platform

Compared 9% of the time

More Aiven Platform Competitors

Apache Flink vs Spring Cloud Data Flow

Compared 33% of the time

TIBCO BusinessWorks vs Spring Cloud Data Flow

Compared 10% of the time

Google Cloud Dataflow vs Spring Cloud Data Flow

Compared 9% of the time

Apache Spark Streaming vs Spring Cloud Data Flow

Compared 7% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs Spring Cloud Data Flow

Compared 5% of the time

More Spring Cloud Data Flow Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Streaming Analytics

November 2024

Download Aiven Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Spring Cloud Data Flow

October 2024

Download Spring Cloud Data Flow product report

Learn More

Aiven

VMware

Overview

Aiven for Apache Kafka is a robust data streaming platform utilized for real-time analytics, event-driven architectures, and message brokering, enhancing data processing across systems. It features scalable operations, excellent data replication, and comprehensive monitoring, significantly improving organizational efficiency and decision-making processes through high-level data management capabilities.

Spring Cloud Data Flow is a toolkit for building data integration and real-time data processing pipelines.
Pipelines consist of Spring Boot apps, built using the Spring Cloud Stream or Spring Cloud Task microservice frameworks. This makes Spring Cloud Data Flow suitable for a range of data processing use cases, from import/export to event streaming and predictive analytics. Use Spring Cloud Data Flow to connect your Enterprise to the Internet of Anything—mobile devices, sensors, wearables, automobiles, and more.

Find out what your peers are saying about Databricks, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Confluent and others in Streaming Analytics. Updated: November 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Streaming Analytics vendors.

We monitor all Streaming Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.