Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Akamai API Security vs NGINX App Protect comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Akamai API Security
Ranking in API Security
1st
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
NGINX App Protect
Ranking in API Security
4th
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
Web Application Firewall (WAF) (16th), Container Security (21st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the API Security category, the mindshare of Akamai API Security is 28.9%, down from 32.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NGINX App Protect is 4.1%, down from 7.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
API Security
 

Featured Reviews

PallaviSharma - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 27, 2023
The solution protects APIs from DDoS attacks, but it should use machine learning and API throttling together
We use Akamai API Security to protect our APIs from any DDoS attacks API throttling is the most valuable feature of Akamai API Security. It would be beneficial to use machine learning and API throttling together to identify how the APIs are called and whether it's coming from the right person or…
Tomaz Sobczak - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 25, 2024
Signature-based detection, DOS protection, and bot protection
NGINX App Protect is easier to automate and configure, or manage from an API. This is good for securing applications. However, it's not suitable for more complex tasks. NGINX App Protect positively impacted performance changes. There's a cache or it works like a proxy, so it can speed up…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature of this solution is its integration with API gateways, WAP and with part of their SDLC."
"API throttling is the most valuable feature of Akamai API Security."
"NGINX App Protect's best features are auto-learning, which creates a profile of applications that are deployed, bot protection, and force protection, which lets you configure your brute force policy and alert for and prevent brute force attacks."
"The tool's most valuable feature is the OWASP certification. Additionally, the tool's ability to enforce strong passwords and OTP within minutes is impressive. With its analytics and recommendations, it is a very good solution."
"It is a very good tool for load balancing."
"NGINX App Protect is stable."
"It has the best documentation features."
"The most valuable feature of NGINX App Protect is its flexibility."
"The policies are flexible based on the technologies you use."
"It's very easy to deploy."
 

Cons

"It would be beneficial to use machine learning and API throttling together to identify how the APIs are called and whether it's coming from the right person or the wrong person."
"I think it would be good if they can integrate more with API gateways as this is currently limited."
"Right now, the tool doesn't provide an option revolving around update feeds, specifically the signature update option in the UI."
"They could provide a better user interface."
"The configuration needs to be more flexible because it is difficult to do things that are outside of the ordinary."
"Areas for improvement would be if NGINX could scan for vulnerabilities and learn and update the signatures of DoS attacks."
"The dashboard could provide a more comprehensive view of the status of the connections."
"Setting policies and parameters through the UI should be more automated because the process is manual, where we can only edit one rule at a time."
"The solution needs to be improved in the e-commerce portal."
"The product's price is high, making it an area of concern where improvements are required. The tool's licensing model is also not good."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have a limit to the number of APIs we can use inside a bundle, and we have to pay extra if we exceed that limit."
"NGINX App Protect is expensive."
"The price of NGINX App Protect is not much different from the products that fall under the leader category of Gartner Magic Quadrant."
"The licensing fees for this solution are pretty expensive for what it does, but there is no alternative."
"The product's price is high."
"NGINX is not expensive."
"There are no additional fees."
"Our licensing costs are about $40,000 a year."
"Really understand the licensing model, because we underestimated that."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Security solutions are best for your needs.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Healthcare Company
7%
Computer Software Company
20%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Energy/Utilities Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Akamai API Security?
API throttling is the most valuable feature of Akamai API Security.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Akamai API Security?
We have a limit to the number of APIs we can use inside a bundle, and we have to pay extra if we exceed that limit.
What needs improvement with Akamai API Security?
It would be beneficial to use machine learning and API throttling together to identify how the APIs are called and whether it's coming from the right person or the wrong person. Akamai is developin...
What needs improvement with NGINX App Protect?
The product's price is high, making it an area of concern where improvements are required. The tool's licensing model is also not good. The product should have more documentation, especially like t...
 

Also Known As

Noname Security
NGINX WAF, NGINX Web Application Firewall
 

Learn More

 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Akamai API Security vs. NGINX App Protect and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.