Akamai CloudTest vs OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise comparison

Akamai and OpenText are both solutions in the Performance Testing Tools category. Akamai is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.0, while OpenText is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.7. Additionally, 85% of Akamai users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Akamai CloudTest

Read 7 Akamai CloudTest reviews

594 Views
437 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise

Read 83 OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise reviews

3,152 Views
1,695 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Akamai CloudTest

OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Akamai CloudTest and OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Performance Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise Report (Updated: November 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise

November 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Akamai CloudTest

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

10th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

9th

Average Rating

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

5th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

5th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Vinod Patil

Senior Manager - Performance Architect at Publicis Sapient

Is user-friendly and offers live monitoring

Extending the same cloud tool to make it app native so that it can help with device performance testing towards HTTP requests and responses. If you can have a front-end tool like Google's Core Web Vitals, it would be great. If you have some integration with Google's Core Web Vitals, it would be great. I want the tool to have IP spoofing because whenever you do load testing, you will have a little bit of static IP based on a particular load generator. If we have an option of just making the real-time scenario, like having IP spoofing, and the range of IPs dynamically gets changed with the request just to mimic the real-time user behavior, then it would be a good improvement. Having integration to APM tools, like Dynatrace or AppDynamics, the way we have in the load tools, would be good.

Read full review

VictorHorescu

Chief Executive Officer at iqst

Ability to test almost every tool in the companies I enter and performs well in a distributed environment

It would be beneficial if LoadRunner could optimize resource usage, especially for protocols that require significant resources, like TrueClient, which interacts directly with the UI. If they could improve resource usage, like ingest or for the load generator, using less CPU or RAM memory, that would be great. That's where I have problems. In real time, when they ask for 5,000 or 10,000 concurrent users, I have to provision a lot of virtual machines to define this load. Then there are situations with certain platforms, especially document management platforms, where the technology is so weird that normal LoadRunner protocols cannot detect it. So, in that case, I have to use that special TruClient protocol. I have to use the TruClient protocol, which actually clicks on the object. Despite the SQL technology, I can still create a script and test for performance. So what I would appreciate a lot is if this protocol would require less resources on a normal virtual machine. I can use fewer concurrent users with TruClient protocols as opposed to almost one hundred with HTTP/HTML. As opposed to many more with HTTP/HTML from, let's say, JMeter. So, optimization at that level for resource consumption by OpenText would be much appreciated.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"From my own experience, if you're talking about load testing and performance testing then definitely you should go for CloudTest. Because when we compared CloudTest with Performance Center, cost wise it was a better solution. It is easy to use as well, and you can definitely get an automation engineer or a performance engineer with very little exposure to any programming or scripting language such as JavaScript. I would definitely recommend this solution and would rate it at eight on a scale from one to ten."

"The level of support is quite good and the integration is also very flexible."

"The solution is very stable."

"The tool is very user-friendly, so you can save a lot of time in terms of your preparation activities."

"This is an awesome performance testing tool for web based applications, able to generate load multiple geographies, dynamic ramp-up to any levels of virtual users."

"We haven't had an outage since we started using the solution."

"Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise is easy to use and has flexibility that allows it to be used on a variety of applications."

"One of the most valuable features of this solution is recording and replaying, and the fact that there are multiple options available to do this."

"The initial setup was straightforward. I was able to download everything myself without any IT support."

"The most beneficial features of the solution are flexibility and versatility in their performance."

"The user interface is fine."

"The most valuable part of the product is the way you can scale the basic testing easily."

"Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise Is very user-friendly."

More OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise pros

Cons

"The test clip should be more user-friendly."

"In terms of improvement, I think integration of these tools with the leading EPM tools would be good. It would help to seamlessly integrate to Dynatrace or AppDynamics to understand what the profiling looks like when generating a load."

"If we have an option of just making the real-time scenario, like having IP spoofing, and the range of IPs dynamically gets changed with the request just to mimic the real-time user behavior, then it would be a good improvement."

"It's a manual process to whitelist respective internal IPs in coordination with web operations team to access Soasta. Availability of any standardized tool from Soasta will make setup process easy."

"Akamai cloud test integration into our current CI/CD pipelines (i.e.) identify and resolve the issues during the sprint phase which helps in delivering an absolute product and reduces time to market/release."

"Dashboard creation should be implemented, so we can get the results in a desired format."

"The cost of the solution is high and can be improved."

"The technical support offered by the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"When we have a new application, recording the application is a pretty tough task. We have tried multiple things. We do scripting or try to record with different settings and on different machines. We try to record multiple times, but we do not know why it is recording and why it is not recording. We do the same thing on different machines. It sometimes records, and at other times, it does not. That is one of the major concerns."

"More real-time monitoring should be available for the system under test."

"After they get over the acquisition, the first improvement is going to be tailoring it for their existing stack of other products. How would LoadRunner work for Documentum? How would it work for Business Network? How would it work for other apps? They can have a pre-package or a guide because they are all in the same family as opposed to being outside."

"Offering a direct integration feature would ensure a completely smooth experience."

"I'd rate the scalability a six out of ten. The main reason is that it's a very expensive application. Other companies might not be able to afford it. For example, if we need to test an application with 10,000 concurrent users, the license can cost a lot of money. That's where OpenText tools shoot themselves in the foot compared to other tools. Because of the price, many companies, like one I used to work for, decided not to renew their licenses and switched to open-source testing tools."

More OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have a yearly license, and I would give it a rating of three out of five."

"The tool's price is at an intermediate level. When you compare it with other enterprise load testing tools, it falls under the average category."

"Running cost is very low."

"We got an 80 percent discount for the product. It was cost-effective, but licenses tend to get expensive."

"We are content with the pricing and find it to be reasonable in terms of value for money."

"We got a very good deal. We are happy with that. We have 5,000 licenses."

"The tool is very expensive."

"They have a much more practical pricing model now."

"The solution should decrease its price."

"I rate the product's pricing a three out of ten."

"It is a bit expensive when compared with other tools."

More OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

28%

Computer Software Company

11%

Insurance Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

18%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Akamai CloudTest?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Akamai CloudTest?

I use the solution in my company for load testing. You can say that it is used on the API and then for web page-level load testing.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Akamai CloudTest?

The tool's very first benefit is zero maintenance. You need not take care of your controller or load generator, so there is zero maintenance. The second benefit of the tool would be in the area of ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?

Now that LoadRunner integrates with Dynatrace and other monitoring tools, it simplifies the process of integration into a company, taking merely five minutes to set up. This ease of integration a...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?

In 2019, I was dealing with the costs of LoadRunner. While I don't remember the exact figures, JMeter being free and RPT being cheaper makes them attractive. The high cost of LoadRunner, in contras...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?

While I don't see any issues with LoadRunner's functionality, the cost of the tool is a major factor. Many of my customers have had to switch to different tools due to the cost of LoadRunner, despi...

See all answers

Comparisons

Apache JMeter vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 44% of the time

OpenText LoadRunner Professional vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 19% of the time

Tricentis NeoLoad vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 17% of the time

BlazeMeter vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 9% of the time

More Akamai CloudTest Competitors

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud vs OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise

Compared 40% of the time

OpenText LoadRunner Professional vs OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise

Compared 23% of the time

Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText Silk Performer vs OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise

Compared 6% of the time

BlazeMeter vs OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest

December 2024

Download Akamai CloudTest product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise

December 2024

Download OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise product report

Also Known As

SOASTA CloudTest

Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise, Performance Center, Micro Focus Performance Center, HPE Performance Center

Learn More

Akamai

OpenText

Overview

Soasta's CloudTest rapidly builds realistic test scenarios using real user data, then tests, analyzes and repairs faster. CloudTest's visual test environment and real-time analytics test your website, mobile app and api backend to give you a streaming view of all your performance data while tests run from back-end systems to front end performance.

Your globally distributed performance testing teams have the responsibility of driving quality acrossyour enterprise while testing a broad range of application types, managing costs and deploying applications that meet the performance requirements of your business. OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise delivers a collaborative testing platform that reduces complexity, centralizes resources and leverages shared assets and licenses to increase consistency across your enterprise.

Sample Customers

Chester Zoo

Hexaware, British Sky Broadcasting, JetBlue

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise

November 2024

Free Report: Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise

Find out what your peers are saying about Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: November 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise report.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors and best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.