Amazon Aurora Serverless vs Oracle Java DB comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Oracle are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #20 with an average rating of 9.0, while Oracle is ranked #19 with an average rating of 9.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 0.2% mindshare in SQL, compared to Oracle’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 71% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Amazon Aurora Serverless

Read 3 Amazon Aurora Serverless reviews

95 Views
41 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Java DB

Read 9 Oracle Java DB reviews

540 Views
421 Comparison Views

71% willing to recommend

Amazon Aurora Serverless

Oracle Java DB

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

Oracle Java DB and Amazon Aurora Serverless offer distinct database solutions in the enterprise category. Amazon Aurora Serverless appears to have the upper hand in scalability and innovation.

Features: Oracle Java DB enables seamless integration with Java applications and provides a lightweight architecture. It is suitable for embedded and desktop applications and is user-friendly. Amazon Aurora Serverless provides auto-scaling, high availability, and advanced performance metrics, catering to enterprises needing cutting-edge technology.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Java DB is simple to deploy and is paired with basic, reliable customer service, making it fit for smaller projects. Amazon Aurora Serverless delivers automated deployment and advanced customer support, suited for larger-scale demands.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Java DB presents competitive upfront pricing, advantageous for Java-centric environments with a solid short-term ROI. Amazon Aurora Serverless adopts a flexible pay-as-you-go model, which may entail higher initial costs but provides substantial long-term growth benefits through dynamic scaling.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon Aurora Serverless vs. Oracle Java DB Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Aurora Serverless vs. Oracle Java DB

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Aurora Serverless

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

20th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle Java DB

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

19th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of Amazon Aurora Serverless is 0.2%. The mindshare of Oracle Java DB is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

Anibal Palacios

CTO at a consultancy with 11-50 employees

Database availability has improved with quick recovery and enhanced network setup

I use Aurora mainly for creating and maintaining databases, such as Aurora (MySQL version) databases, within the system. I value it for its network security and quicker recovery options Aurora is used as it is an easier solution for our requirements and offers high availability. It allows us to…

Read full review

Anil-Sinha

Senior Consultant at CGI

Able to process all the reporting and processing in the database itself

We have been upgrading and moving to new environments. I was involved in the solution's initial setup. Some things in the setup are very smooth sailing. However, some setups become complicated because what they set up doesn't meet your needs. So, some tweaking is necessary in certain instances. Having a good understanding of the tool really helps. Oracle Java DB is easy to deploy if it's a new setup. Migrating from an old environment to a new environment takes time because you need the old functionality. A first-time deployment of the application is easy. We just did a default setup and started using it. When we have to migrate, there is too much baggage behind that application, especially from the security point of view.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Amazon Aurora Serverless is its serverless nature, which means I do not have to maintain the underlying infrastructure."

"Aurora could improve its affordability, even though its price is very completive compared to DBs as SLQ Server."

"Amazon Aurora Serverless is easy to scale, offering a cluster-based shared scaling model with options for Autoscale."

"There have been no issues in relation to stability. We've never really had do to any recoveries. It is very stable."

"The solution is stable."

"The additional value of having Java inside the Oracle database is all the security that is applied to an Oracle database will be enforced on Java's stored procedures as well."

"Able to write queries more efficiently and the management of data has become better and easier."

"The most valuable feature is automation."

"It's very clever."

"The database is quite robust in terms of performance from the SQL side."

"It has a programming language so anything that we require for Selenium is all available there."

More Oracle Java DB pros

Cons

"Amazon Aurora could improve its detailed monitoring, especially in CloudWatch, to provide more precise query level insights."

"Aurora could improve its affordability, as it is currently considered a bit expensive."

"Amazon Aurora Serverless could benefit from a few more security features, particularly in terms of its accessibility."

"In terms of improvement, I'd like an automation tool that is lower priced. The core prices are very high."

"The solution should continue to keep updating and improving the Java language."

"The tool might be integrated, but we see performance issues because of overhead."

"It'll be better if Oracle Java supports open source technologies, like Node.js."

"The solution could be more user-friendly."

"The biggest lesson that I have learned from using Oracle products is vendor lock-in."

"Oracle can improve by providing more connection string variations and relay servers on the path to the database."

"Needs improvement in consistency issues with respect to timeframes."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Oracle Java DB is a pricey solution."

"The product's pricing is very friendly, with no extra costs after the licensing fees."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Educational Organization

12%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon Aurora Serverless?

In my experience, Aurora is a bit expensive. The costs depend on the size of the database.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon Aurora Serverless?

Aurora could improve its affordability, as it is currently considered a bit expensive. There is room to make it more cost-effective for users even though its price is very completive compared to DB...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Amazon Aurora Serverless?

I use Aurora mainly for creating and maintaining databases, such as Aurora (MySQL version) databases, within the system. I value it for its network security and quicker recovery options.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Java DB?

Oracle can improve by providing more connection string variations and relay servers on the path to the database. Various ways of connecting would enhance functionality.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Java DB?

I have experience connecting to a database with Java by using Java code and interrogating the database.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Oracle Java DB?

It's important to consider several settings and connection strings, as well as firewall rules when connecting to the database. I would rate the overall solution nine out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

MySQL vs Oracle Java DB

Compared 52% of the time

Oracle Database vs Oracle Java DB

Compared 31% of the time

IBM Db2 Database vs Oracle Java DB

Compared 17% of the time

More Oracle Java DB Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Relational Databases Tools

March 2025

Download Amazon Aurora Serverless product report

Buyer's Guide

Relational Databases Tools

March 2025

Download Oracle Java DB product report

Overview

Amazon Aurora Serverless is a flexible, on-demand database service that automatically scales based on application needs. It removes the need for database management, allowing businesses to focus on innovation and efficiency.

This database service provides automatic rescaling of compute capacity, which makes it uniquely suited to unpredictable workloads and applications with variable demand. It integrates seamlessly with existing AWS services and supports both MySQL and PostgreSQL, ensuring high availability and durability while reducing costs associated with over-provisioning of resources. Aurora Serverless dynamically adjusts capacity, providing a cost-effective and reliable solution for cloud-native applications and serverless architectures.

What are the key features of Amazon Aurora Serverless?

Automatic Scaling: Instantly adjusts capacity in response to demand.
Managed Infrastructure: Offloads database maintenance and management tasks.
High Availability: Provides multi-AZ support to ensure uptime and reliability.
MySQL and PostgreSQL Compatibility: Supports migrations and existing applications.
Pay-Per-Use: Charges are based on the exact resources utilized.

What benefits can be found in reviews of Amazon Aurora Serverless?

Cost Savings: Helps significantly reduce infrastructure expenses.
Operational Efficiency: Frees up time for the IT team for strategic projects.
Scalability: Easily accommodates fluctuating application demands.
Integration: Works seamlessly with AWS services, enhancing service reach.
Resiliency: Robust data protection features contribute to data security.

Amazon Aurora Serverless has been widely adopted across industries such as ecommerce and online media, where demand can vary greatly and unpredictably. For instance, ecommerce platforms benefit from auto-scaling during peak shopping seasons, ensuring uninterrupted service without incurring unnecessary costs during off-peak periods. Similarly, media companies leverage its auto-scaling capabilities to manage traffic spikes during events or breaking news.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Java DB is a relational database management system (RDBMS). Data is stored and queried via SQL or JDBC. Like other RDBMSs, Java DB can also be accessed through a persistence layer such as JPA, Hibernate, or JDO. Java objects can be stored in the columns of Java DB tables.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Université Nice Sophia Antipolis

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Aurora Serverless vs. Oracle Java DB

April 2025

Free Report: Amazon Aurora Serverless vs. Oracle Java DB

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Aurora Serverless vs. Oracle Java DB and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon Aurora Serverless vs. Oracle Java DB report.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.