Amazon Aurora vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Oracle are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.2, while Oracle is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.3. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 3.4% mindshare in SQL, compared to Oracle’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Amazon Aurora

Read 13 Amazon Aurora reviews

3,317 Views
2,999 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Read 17 Oracle MySQL Cloud Service reviews

224 Views
174 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Amazon Aurora

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon Aurora and Oracle MySQL Cloud Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Relational Databases Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon Aurora vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Aurora vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 832,138 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Aurora

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

11th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Open Source Databases (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of Amazon Aurora is 3.4%, down from 4.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is 0.2%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

Rajitha Jatothu

Aws Devops Engineer at LTIMindtree

Achieve high performance with fault-tolerant and highly available database management

Aurora is a key pillar for us, offering performance and availability. It is faster than RDS and supports multi-region clusters and scalability. One feature we value is Aurora's ability to provide a reader endpoint, allowing applications to connect without tracking replicas. It supports auto-scaling and offers several options for monitoring and optimizing database performance. Aurora's fault tolerance and ability to handle multiple replicas contribute to its reliability and high performance.

Read full review

Raghuram K M

Chief Technology Officer at Prognosys Medical Systems

Ideal, stable, good support and it helps with the developer console

I have used MongoDB, MySQL, and Oracle. MongoDB is entirely different. It's a NoSQL platform database, so it's totally different. It is a little bit hard to work with. The way it is organized and structured is different. But between Microsoft Azure MySQL and Oracle, they are pretty similar. * Cost: Microsoft is not a preferred platform. Their licensing is very complex and expensive. Oracle is much better. * AI: In terms of data analytics and AI, Microsoft is better. Certain complex transformations are easier to do in MSSQL. So, if you have to analyze data from a lot of different data sources, it becomes much easier. However, the usage of the particular product depends on the project. Personally, I would like to work on MySQL. But in certain cases where the application scale is very large, and custom models from certain regions of the globe prefer Microsoft, then we have to go with MSSQL. But technically, there is not much difference.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Aurora's compatibility with MySQL or PostgreSQL benefited our database management. The migration from on-premise MySQL to Aurora was similar, so we didn't need to change our source code."

"Aurora's features that I find the most beneficial include its database backup strategy, performance options, and input-output operations."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to do multiple-read and single-write. These are the kinds of features that we were interested in, and Aurora takes care of that natively."

"The most valuable feature of Amazon Aurora is SQL standardization, it doesn't have its own syntax which is good. It has a lot of hands-off self-management type of activities, such as log rolling and auto-scaling."

"Aurora is a key pillar for us, offering performance and availability."

"We had better control over the parameters that we could tweak in terms of intermediate storage and better indexing capabilities."

"The provision of custom read and write endpoints eliminates the need for managing a separate proxy load balancer."

"The most valuable feature is that the maintainability is offloaded to the service provider. I don't have to maintain a database or do any administrative tasks, which comes in handy."

More Amazon Aurora pros

"The solution overall is very, very good. It's got good integration with other databases and adds new features often."

"The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that it is flexible and is an open-source product."

"The scalability of the database is absolutely guaranteed by the new features."

"The access to a suite of management and administration tools that simplify tasks such as database provisioning, configuration, and monitoring."

"The product is good for tuning."

"The initial setup was straightforward."

"The solution's performance is good."

"Oracle MySQL Cloud Service handles data easily."

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service pros

Cons

"It is a bit costly. The features are quite good, and I wouldn't say it requires any technical improvements. But from a cost perspective, some clients wouldn't go for Aurora because of that."

"The pricing could improve. It should be reduced."

"I would like to see more AI-related features in future releases."

"I would like to see performance insights on the database based on the queries. Currently, we use SolarWinds as the monitoring tool. I would like to leverage SolarWinds’ performance insights in AWS services. SolarWinds gives larger insights when we run performance issues."

"The product's distributed query process for MySQL needs improvement."

"There is improvement needed to have more developer focus. Additionally, it would be helpful to have a stand-alone solution outside of Amazon. Amazon has a tendency to favor developing web-based clients, which may not always provide the fastest or most responsive solution as desired."

"While Amazon Aurora meets your current scaling and storage needs, there is room for improvement in cryptography and scalability compared to other databases."

"It would have been helpful if they had provided some benchmarking numbers."

More Amazon Aurora cons

"The product has many bugs."

"It requires a significant amount of expertise and effort to manage, especially when dealing with substantial volumes of data."

"Sometimes, we face syntax issues with the solution."

"They could include more advanced features like clustering and replication in the Oracle databases."

"MySQL should have some kind of native query browser. If it could come with a built-in connector."

"Sometimes MySQL does upgrades on the server. When we are still using the old server and when they integrate the upgrade, they don't carry along some of the old syntaxes. The versions don't sync."

"Integrating business intelligence or NLP solutions would help us save time and would prevent us from having to take a deep dive. Data problems seem to multiply on the system when you interact with it. Automation would save a lot of man-hours."

"The technical support is in need of improvement."

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is no need to buy a license for the product. We can pay as per the use case."

"It is quite expensive."

"The price could be lower compared to its competitors."

"It is an expensive solution."

"I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, with ten being expensive."

"The tool’s pricing depends on the instance type. For cost optimization purposes, we use the result instance category."

"While the core solution itself is not exorbitant, the support services are associated with a significant maintenance fee, often ranging from twenty to thirty percent."

"The license is expensive."

"Oracle has a better licensing model compared to its competitors."

"The product is expensive."

"The product is free since it is an open-source tool."

"It is an open-source product."

"The solution’s paid plans are expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

832,138 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

28%

Computer Software Company

15%

Government

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon Aurora?

Aurora's compatibility with MySQL or PostgreSQL benefited our database management. The migration from on-premise MySQL to Aurora was similar, so we didn't need to change our source code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon Aurora?

The price of Aurora is generally reasonable. It fluctuates based on performance levels and usage, yet maintains a good balance with our operational demands.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon Aurora?

Currently, I am unsure what aspects of Aurora require improvement. The solution meets our needs in terms of high availability, durability, and backups. However, room for improvement might be in the...

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service handles data easily.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

I have only used the community edition and do not have experience with the enterprise edition or its pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

There could be improvements, particularly in Firebird, where the indexing is limited to just a single B-tree index, leading to poor performance for large-scale queries.

See all answers

Comparisons

SQL Server vs Amazon Aurora

Compared 39% of the time

Oracle Database vs Amazon Aurora

Compared 26% of the time

MariaDB vs Amazon Aurora

Compared 9% of the time

SAP HANA vs Amazon Aurora

Compared 7% of the time

CockroachDB vs Amazon Aurora

Compared 5% of the time

More Amazon Aurora Competitors

Firebird SQL vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Compared 58% of the time

MySQL vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Compared 42% of the time

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Aurora

February 2025

Download Amazon Aurora product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

January 2025

Download Oracle MySQL Cloud Service product report

Overview

Amazon Aurora is a MySQL and PostgreSQL-compatible relational database built for the cloud, that combines the performance and availability of traditional enterprise databases with the simplicity and cost-effectiveness of open source databases.

Amazon Aurora is up to five times faster than standard MySQL databases and three times faster than standard PostgreSQL databases. It provides the security, availability, and reliability of commercial databases at 1/10th the cost. Amazon Aurora is fully managed by Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS), which automates time-consuming administration tasks like hardware provisioning, database setup, patching, and backups.

Amazon Aurora features a distributed, fault-tolerant, self-healing storage system that auto-scales up to 64TB per database instance. It delivers high performance and availability with up to 15 low-latency read replicas, point-in-time recovery, continuous backup to Amazon S3, and replication across three Availability Zones (AZs).

Visit the Amazon RDS Management Console to create your first Aurora database instance and start migrating your MySQL and PostgreSQL databases.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service delivers a secure, cost-effective and enterprise-grade MySQL database service. Built on MySQL Enterprise Edition and powered by the Oracle Cloud, it provides a simple, automated, integrated and enterprise ready MySQL cloud service, enabling organizations to increase business agility and reduce costs.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Dow Jones, Arizona State University, Verizon, Capital One, United Nations, Nielsen, Autodesk, Fanduel

Omnis, Naveex, Rehash Technologies

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Aurora vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

January 2025

Free Report: Amazon Aurora vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Aurora vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

832,138 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon Aurora vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service report.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.