Amazon Elastic Container Service vs Google Container Engine comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Google are both solutions in the Container Management category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.4, while Google is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 1.4% mindshare in CM, compared to Google’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Google users who would recommend it.

Amazon Elastic Container Se...

Read 50 Amazon Elastic Container Service reviews

980 Views
682 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Google Container Engine

Read 1 Google Container Engine review

90 Views
49 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon Elastic Container Se...

Google Container Engine

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon Elastic Container Service and Google Container Engine based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Amazon Web Services (AWS), VMware and others in Container Management.

To learn more, read our detailed Container Management Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Container Management

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,190 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Elastic Container Se...

Ranking in Container Management

7th

Ranking in Containers as a Service (CaaS)

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Google Container Engine

Ranking in Container Management

17th

Ranking in Containers as a Service (CaaS)

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Container Management category, the mindshare of Amazon Elastic Container Service is 1.4%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Google Container Engine is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Management

Featured Reviews

FABIO NAGAO

Chief Technology Officer at Looplex SA

Horizontal scaling is streamlined when deploying modern workloads

Currently, when scaling with Amazon Elastic Container Service, I have to choose between monitoring CPU or memory usage to scale up or scale out; there is no option to monitor both simultaneously. This limitation makes it challenging to define a balanced scale-out automation since a well-written software should balance between processing and memory.

Read full review

Hoang Do

DevOps Engineer at The Digital Group Inc

Has autoscaling features that helps to save costs

We use the solution to deploy microservices. The tool is very powerful, scalable, and easy to manage. Its autoscaling features helped us save costs. Google Container Engine needs to be able to manage network products. I have been using the product for two years. I rate the product's…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is user-friendly."

"The containerization is a valuable feature for us."

"The product's most valuable feature is service discovery functionality. It is an excellent feature impacting cost reduction."

"It's quick and easy to have the solution working."

"Amazon EC2 Container Service is a stable solution."

"The tool's most valuable feature is the ability to create revisions on the configurations."

"I use the tool to manage containerized applications. What I like about Amazon ECS is the interface it provides. Although the configurations can be extensive, such as setting up auto-scaling groups and configuring separate tasks and services for each application, the interface makes it manageable."

"Overall, I would rate the solution highly over time as there is no reason not to, giving it a rating of 10 out of 10."

More Amazon Elastic Container Service pros

"The tool is very powerful, scalable, and easy to manage. Its autoscaling features helped us save costs."

Cons

"The solution could provide more reliability."

"Since it is a managed service for container orchestration, it may limit our control over certain infrastructure functions."

"Amazon EC2 Container Service's security can be improved."

"My company has faced some stability issues with Amazon EC2 Container Service."

"In the next release, they could add some customization options for high computer workloads."

"I also believe there are limitations in terms of upgrading. The software has the concept of dedicated servers that you can manage. However, an issue arises when you can't match one operating system with another that you've already purchased. You can't simply merge them; instead, you have to buy a completely new one. This limitation has caused some challenges for us."

"The orchestration of the workloads running in ECS needs improvement."

"The solution needs to be more usable."

More Amazon Elastic Container Service cons

"Google Container Engine needs to be able to manage network products."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Amazon EC2 Container Service is worth the money."

"The tool's licensing is monthly."

"Amazon Elastic Container Service has a decent price, which is neither cheap nor expensive."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price, I rate Amazon EC2 Container Service’s pricing a four or five out of ten."

"The product's pricing is good."

"Licensing can be purchased directly from AWS or used with existing licenses, depending on the company's preference. The licensing structure is complex and depends on factors such as machine size, number of processors, and Container size. Companies have dedicated staff members managing license considerations full-time to find the most cost-effective options. Also, I have seen some companies opt for a combination of AWS and Azure, using more of Azure for Microsoft licenses due to potentially lower costs compared to AWS."

"The solution is expensive, but not too much."

"The solution's cost could be reduced."

More Amazon Elastic Container Service pricing and cost advice

"The tool's pricing is medium."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,190 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

31%

Computer Software Company

16%

Government

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon Elastic Container Service?

Implementing the product has helped me monitor the parameters. I utilize tools like CloudWatch and AWS systems to track these parameters. If any issues arise, I alert our developer team to address ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon Elastic Container Service?

The product's pricing is good.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon Elastic Container Service?

The solution must improve backup and compatibility around OS like Windows and Mac.

See all answers

What do you like most about Google Container Engine?

The tool is very powerful, scalable, and easy to manage. Its autoscaling features helped us save costs.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Container Engine?

The tool's pricing is medium.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google Container Engine?

Google Container Engine needs to be able to manage network products.

See all answers

Comparisons

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform vs Amazon Elastic Container Service

Compared 73% of the time

Microsoft Azure Container Service vs Amazon Elastic Container Service

Compared 14% of the time

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Amazon Elastic Container Service

Compared 14% of the time

More Amazon Elastic Container Service Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Elastic Container Service

April 2025

Download Amazon Elastic Container Service product report

Buyer's Guide

Container Management

April 2025

Download Google Container Engine product report

Also Known As

Amazon ECS, Amazon EC2 Container Service

No data available

Overview

Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) is a highly scalable, high-performance container orchestration service that supports Docker containers and allows you to easily run and scale containerized applications on AWS. Amazon ECS eliminates the need for you to install and operate your own container orchestration software, manage and scale a cluster of virtual machines, or schedule containers on those virtual machines.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Google Container Engine is a powerful cluster manager and orchestration system for running your Docker containers. Container Engine schedules your containers into the cluster and manages them automatically based on requirements you define (such as CPU and memory). It's built on the open source Kubernetes system, giving you the flexibility to take advantage of on-premises, hybrid, or public cloud infrastructure.

Google

Sample Customers

Ubisoft, GoPro, TIBCO, Remind

Tock

Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Amazon Web Services (AWS), VMware and others in Container Management. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,190 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Container Management vendors and best Containers as a Service (CaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.