Amazon Elastic Container Service vs Google Container Engine comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Google are both solutions in the Container Management category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.4, while Google is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 1.5% mindshare in CM, compared to Google’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Google users who would recommend it.

Amazon Elastic Container Se...

Read 49 Amazon Elastic Container Service reviews

1,030 Views
733 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Google Container Engine

Read 1 Google Container Engine review

87 Views
51 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon Elastic Container Se...

Google Container Engine

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon Elastic Container Service and Google Container Engine based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Amazon Web Services (AWS), VMware and others in Container Management.

To learn more, read our detailed Container Management Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Container Management

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,296 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Elastic Container Se...

Ranking in Container Management

7th

Ranking in Containers as a Service (CaaS)

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Google Container Engine

Ranking in Container Management

15th

Ranking in Containers as a Service (CaaS)

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Container Management category, the mindshare of Amazon Elastic Container Service is 1.5%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Google Container Engine is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Management

Featured Reviews

FABIO NAGAO

Chief Technology Officer at Looplex SA

Horizontal scaling is streamlined when deploying modern workloads

Currently, when scaling with Amazon Elastic Container Service, I have to choose between monitoring CPU or memory usage to scale up or scale out; there is no option to monitor both simultaneously. This limitation makes it challenging to define a balanced scale-out automation since a well-written software should balance between processing and memory.

Read full review

Hoang Do

DevOps Engineer at The Digital Group Inc

Has autoscaling features that helps to save costs

We use the solution to deploy microservices. The tool is very powerful, scalable, and easy to manage. Its autoscaling features helped us save costs. Google Container Engine needs to be able to manage network products. I have been using the product for two years. I rate the product's…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has an Auto Scaling group feature. We can use this feature to have an Auto Scaling group to specify a minimum and maximum count for all types of configurations. Based on the specified values, Amazon Elastic Container Service scales the required CPU environmental metrics."

"Amazon Elastic Container Service makes horizontal scaling easy and is especially effective when working under the ECS service."

"The cloud services are readily available."

"The solution's technical support is good."

"The solution is quite scalable and allows you to launch multiple EC2s within minutes."

"I use the tool to manage containerized applications. What I like about Amazon ECS is the interface it provides. Although the configurations can be extensive, such as setting up auto-scaling groups and configuring separate tasks and services for each application, the interface makes it manageable."

"Amazon Elastic Container Service is more stable."

"Amazon Elastic Container Service serves the function it's supposed to serve."

More Amazon Elastic Container Service pros

"The tool is very powerful, scalable, and easy to manage. Its autoscaling features helped us save costs."

Cons

"The pricing could be a bit better."

"In the next release, they could add some customization options for high computer workloads."

"The solution needs to be more usable."

"Sometimes, the instances fail under the ECS container cluster, and we have to manually go and find out the black sheep in the ECS container instance. We had an issue earlier where one of the instances under the ECS container cluster went down, and we were not able to identify that instance. The instance got terminated, but a new instance did not come up. Therefore, I had to manually get that instance up. It could be optimized better. In production, we normally cannot sustain such things. It can be optimized in terms of instances, durability, and serving the requests of customers."

"There is room for improvement in the licensing costs. There can be better licensing costs."

"The existing domain-joined capability the solution provides during the initial boot-up of the compute should be streamlined and made a little robust."

"I would like the product to improve integration with different platforms."

"Amazon Elastic Container Service should simplify its management. It can be difficult for someone who doesn't have much experience with the tool. Also, the tool needs to add the ability to manage networks."

More Amazon Elastic Container Service cons

"Google Container Engine needs to be able to manage network products."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I don't know the exact amount we were charged for our use of ECS, but I do know that it can be costly, especially when there is a bug or an error caused by default configurations."

"Amazon EC2 Container Service is priced high."

"Amazon EC2 Container Service is cheap."

"Amazon ECS is expensive."

"I rate the product's pricing an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"The solution's cost could be reduced."

"The pricing of Amazon EC2 Container Service is average."

"The solution is expensive, but not too much."

More Amazon Elastic Container Service pricing and cost advice

"The tool's pricing is medium."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

33%

Computer Software Company

15%

Government

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon Elastic Container Service?

Implementing the product has helped me monitor the parameters. I utilize tools like CloudWatch and AWS systems to track these parameters. If any issues arise, I alert our developer team to address ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon Elastic Container Service?

The product's pricing is good.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon Elastic Container Service?

The solution must improve backup and compatibility around OS like Windows and Mac.

See all answers

What do you like most about Google Container Engine?

The tool is very powerful, scalable, and easy to manage. Its autoscaling features helped us save costs.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Container Engine?

The tool's pricing is medium.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google Container Engine?

Google Container Engine needs to be able to manage network products.

See all answers

Comparisons

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform vs Amazon Elastic Container Service

Compared 70% of the time

Microsoft Azure Container Service vs Amazon Elastic Container Service

Compared 16% of the time

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Amazon Elastic Container Service

Compared 15% of the time

More Amazon Elastic Container Service Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Elastic Container Service

March 2025

Download Amazon Elastic Container Service product report

Buyer's Guide

Container Management

March 2025

Download Google Container Engine product report

Also Known As

Amazon ECS, Amazon EC2 Container Service

No data available

Overview

Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) is a highly scalable, high-performance container orchestration service that supports Docker containers and allows you to easily run and scale containerized applications on AWS. Amazon ECS eliminates the need for you to install and operate your own container orchestration software, manage and scale a cluster of virtual machines, or schedule containers on those virtual machines.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Google Container Engine is a powerful cluster manager and orchestration system for running your Docker containers. Container Engine schedules your containers into the cluster and manages them automatically based on requirements you define (such as CPU and memory). It's built on the open source Kubernetes system, giving you the flexibility to take advantage of on-premises, hybrid, or public cloud infrastructure.

Google

Sample Customers

Ubisoft, GoPro, TIBCO, Remind

Tock

Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Amazon Web Services (AWS), VMware and others in Container Management. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Container Management vendors and best Containers as a Service (CaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.