Amazon Elastic Container Service vs Google Container Engine comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Google are both solutions in the Container Management category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.4, while Google is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 2.3% mindshare in CM, compared to Google’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Google users who would recommend it.

Amazon Elastic Container Se...

Read 48 Amazon Elastic Container Service reviews

1,195 Views
864 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Google Container Engine

Read 1 Google Container Engine review

88 Views
59 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon Elastic Container Se...

Google Container Engine

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon Elastic Container Service and Google Container Engine based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Amazon Web Services (AWS), VMware and others in Container Management.

To learn more, read our detailed Container Management Report (Updated: November 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Container Management

November 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Elastic Container Se...

Ranking in Container Management

7th

Ranking in Containers as a Service (CaaS)

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Google Container Engine

Ranking in Container Management

15th

Ranking in Containers as a Service (CaaS)

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Container Management category, the mindshare of Amazon Elastic Container Service is 2.3%, down from 3.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Google Container Engine is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Management

Featured Reviews

Salvador Fernández

Cloud Architect at iwell iwell Co.Co.

Helps to maintain a global file system but improvement is needed in backup

Implementing the product has helped me monitor the parameters. I utilize tools like CloudWatch and AWS systems to track these parameters. If any issues arise, I alert our developer team to address and resolve them. The product helps to have a global file system. Also, it helps in data replication from region to region.

Read full review

Hoang Do

DevOps Engineer at The Digital Group Inc

Has autoscaling features that helps to save costs

We use the solution to deploy microservices. The tool is very powerful, scalable, and easy to manage. Its autoscaling features helped us save costs. Google Container Engine needs to be able to manage network products. I have been using the product for two years. I rate the product's…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Once you get the procedure right, and set a pattern, it just works."

"The solution is user-friendly."

"I like Amazon EC2 Container Service's elasticity."

"It has an Auto Scaling group feature. We can use this feature to have an Auto Scaling group to specify a minimum and maximum count for all types of configurations. Based on the specified values, Amazon Elastic Container Service scales the required CPU environmental metrics."

"Performance is our top priority. So, if we need to deploy on a high-specification machine, we can choose it from the software. If we just need a low-specification one, we can just choose it based on the requirement handling software configuration."

"I like the per-second billing."

"In seven years, we have not faced a single second of downtime."

"The production environment is highly available, which nowadays is a requirement for all of the big companies."

More Amazon Elastic Container Service pros

"The tool is very powerful, scalable, and easy to manage. Its autoscaling features helped us save costs."

Cons

"The solution must improve backup and compatibility around OS like Windows and Mac."

"The tool initially required a significant amount of development time on the backend, but in terms of efficiency, it's a one-time effort."

"Amazon Elastic Container Service should simplify its management. It can be difficult for someone who doesn't have much experience with the tool. Also, the tool needs to add the ability to manage networks."

"Sometimes, the instances fail under the ECS container cluster, and we have to manually go and find out the black sheep in the ECS container instance. We had an issue earlier where one of the instances under the ECS container cluster went down, and we were not able to identify that instance. The instance got terminated, but a new instance did not come up. Therefore, I had to manually get that instance up. It could be optimized better. In production, we normally cannot sustain such things. It can be optimized in terms of instances, durability, and serving the requests of customers."

"The user interface of ECS could be improved for better navigation and to assist in quickly setting up a deployment."

"Support could be better with response time and knowledge of staff."

"The solution's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"Amazon Elastic Container Service’s initial setup is a bit difficult."

More Amazon Elastic Container Service cons

"Google Container Engine needs to be able to manage network products."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Amazon EC2 Container Service is cheap."

"Our client is paying between $400 and $500 USD per month for this service."

"The product's pricing is good."

"If you want to scale without the traditional methods, the solution is a bit cost-effective."

"I don't exactly deal with the pricing. We have a separate Infra team that deals with the pricing. They are more into the scalability part. Based on our requirements, the pricing will increase. The automation teams will test some of the benefits to see how can we can optimize the cost. They'll have a security manager connection and some alerts based upon the usage to see how to reduce the building cost based upon the installations."

"Although AWS has successfully captured over 60 percent of the market in the cloud part, the tool is competitively way cheaper for the resources it provides compared to the other solutions."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price, I rate Amazon EC2 Container Service’s pricing a four or five out of ten."

"The solution's cost could be reduced."

More Amazon Elastic Container Service pricing and cost advice

"The tool's pricing is medium."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

32%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon Elastic Container Service?

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon Elastic Container Service?

The product's pricing is good.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon Elastic Container Service?

The solution must improve backup and compatibility around OS like Windows and Mac.

See all answers

What do you like most about Google Container Engine?

The tool is very powerful, scalable, and easy to manage. Its autoscaling features helped us save costs.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Container Engine?

The tool's pricing is medium.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google Container Engine?

Google Container Engine needs to be able to manage network products.

See all answers

Comparisons

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform vs Amazon Elastic Container Service

Compared 60% of the time

Microsoft Azure Container Service vs Amazon Elastic Container Service

Compared 13% of the time

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Amazon Elastic Container Service

Compared 13% of the time

Akamai Connected Cloud (Linode) vs Amazon Elastic Container Service

Compared 8% of the time

More Amazon Elastic Container Service Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Elastic Container Service

December 2024

Download Amazon Elastic Container Service product report

Buyer's Guide

Container Management

November 2024

Download Google Container Engine product report

Also Known As

Amazon ECS, Amazon EC2 Container Service

No data available

Learn More

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Google

Overview

Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) is a highly scalable, high-performance container orchestration service that supports Docker containers and allows you to easily run and scale containerized applications on AWS. Amazon ECS eliminates the need for you to install and operate your own container orchestration software, manage and scale a cluster of virtual machines, or schedule containers on those virtual machines.

Google Container Engine is a powerful cluster manager and orchestration system for running your Docker containers. Container Engine schedules your containers into the cluster and manages them automatically based on requirements you define (such as CPU and memory). It's built on the open source Kubernetes system, giving you the flexibility to take advantage of on-premises, hybrid, or public cloud infrastructure.

Sample Customers

Ubisoft, GoPro, TIBCO, Remind

Tock

Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Amazon Web Services (AWS), VMware and others in Container Management. Updated: November 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Container Management vendors and best Containers as a Service (CaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.