Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amazon Fraud Detector vs Broadcom Payment Security comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Fraud Detector
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
18th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Broadcom Payment Security
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
27th
Average Rating
8.8
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Fraud Detection and Prevention category, the mindshare of Amazon Fraud Detector is 0.9%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Broadcom Payment Security is 1.1%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Fraud Detection and Prevention
 

Featured Reviews

PP
Nov 25, 2020
Quickly and reliably identifies potentially fraudulent activity
The problem I was facing, from a machine learning perspective, it only had a supervised learning capability. You would have to provide your data live, but in fraud, the pattern of the fraudsters keeps changing and it's impossible to provide data labels. That's where the user unsupervised learning comes in handy — you don't have to tell them, "okay, this is fraud and this is not fraud." If unsupervised learning was also incorporated with Amazon SageMaker, that would be really cool. I am talking about anomaly detection algorithms, like isolation, forest, or anything on the neural network side for anomaly detection, including autoencoders. These are some things which companies would really like to use. There was also a problem with latency. In fraud detection, everything needs to be happening in real-time, but some of the algorithms ran for three to four minutes, which is not a viable option.
it_user651801 - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 24, 2017
We have functionality for challenging fraud and risk analytics.
Unifying operational changes around highlighting. If you highlight one item, it will highlight the one card that's affected across the board. Unifying that functionality across all areas of the components that operations would use would be really good, giving them a great landscape to work with. Can you see all of it on one screen and is it clear? One thing we are going through right now is looking at the legacy system and seeing where that information from the audit area would be getting back to an agent. They are used to seeing something that they're adopting in the new system. Are they going to see the same thing? If not, do they need to see it? Challenging the operations as well, rather than just saying, "The product doesn't give us what we need, therefore, we need to change it".

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Utilize the transaction pricing model versus the active cards because the ability to monitor active cards hasn’t been good."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions are best for your needs.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
26%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Healthcare Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Also Known As

AWS Cloud9 IDE, Cloud9 IDE
CA Risk Analytics, CA Transaction Manager, CA Payment Security Suite
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
Eurocard
Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: October 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.