Amazon FSx vs WekaFS comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and WekaIO are both solutions in the File System Software category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.3, while WekaIO is ranked #2. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 5.2% mindshare in FSS, compared to WekaIO’s 21.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of WekaIO users who would recommend it.

Amazon FSx

Read 3 Amazon FSx reviews

409 Views
345 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

WekaFS

Read 1 WekaFS review

2,249 Views
1,182 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon FSx

WekaFS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon FSx and WekaFS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Nasuni, WekaIO, CTERA and others in File System Software.

To learn more, read our detailed File System Software Report (Updated: February 2025).

Buyer's Guide

File System Software

February 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,713 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon FSx

Ranking in File System Software

5th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Storage (14th), File and Object Storage (17th)

WekaFS

Ranking in File System Software

2nd

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the File System Software category, the mindshare of Amazon FSx is 5.2%, down from 7.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WekaFS is 21.0%, down from 22.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

File System Software

Featured Reviews

MuhammadAzhar Khan

Senior DevOps Engineer at Alibaba Group

Shared storage capabilities provide enterprise value with good reliability

Amazon FSx is more costly compared to other storage solutions like EBS or EFS. The auto-scaling feature should be improved, as it currently includes downtime. I need to manually increase the storage, which is not ideal. Integrating FSx with Windows Server is challenging; it's a long process involving Active Directory (AD) setup and synchronization.

Read full review

Roberto Telezynski

Solutions Architect - Senior at Storageone

It's really fast, flexible new technology and we don't have any bottlenecks due to speed

It's really fast, flexible and new technology. We don't have any bottlenecks due to speed. We can snapshot all the data to object storage and replicate it to another site using the object storage features. You can take as many snapshots as you want to back up all your data. There's no limit to cluster size, so you can grow as many WEKA cluster nodes as you want. Apart from snapshots of data to object storage, you can also tier the data, which is a different procedure. They can provide huge bandwidth or throughput to a single client. This is a very special platform for working with high-performance computing. You can use a server like a DGX or an NVIDIA and provide individual clients with almost 200 gigabytes per second. This is where PowerScale and Isilon have major limitations. We don't have such limitations with Weka. That's why it's been indicated for high-performance computing clusters. I'm very excited to work with this platform.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"FSx operates as an independent service, not tied to any server, which eliminates dependencies between applications for storage."

"The shared storage capability is highly valuable."

"I rate the stability of Amazon FSx ten out of ten."

"We used it for disaster recovery perspective behind a number of resources, like batch services and RDS."

"There's no limit to cluster size, so you can grow as many WEKA cluster nodes as you want."

Cons

"Amazon FSx is more costly compared to other storage solutions like EBS or EFS."

"A direct FTP feature would be beneficial instead of relying on transmission services."

"I've been facing a challenge when doing a failover from FSx side. AWS console does not refresh within a half hour."

"Amazon FSx is more costly compared to other storage solutions like EBS or EFS."

"If the product included synchronous replication and VLAN integration, I would rate it 10 out of 10."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The lowest price I have paid is $370 or $380 per month, while the highest can exceed $3,000 per month."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File System Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

17%

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Amazon FSx?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Amazon FSx?

I use Amazon FSx as a shared storage service for Windows, particularly when there are multiple Windows servers and a need for shared storage. I use it when shared resources with different servers, ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Amazon FSx?

I must be aware of my specific use case and choose the solution accordingly. I use FSx when shared storage is required without the need for internet connectivity. It is cheaper to use Amazon S3 whe...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Azure NetApp Files vs Amazon FSx

Compared 21% of the time

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs Amazon FSx

Compared 14% of the time

Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs Amazon FSx

Compared 12% of the time

Nasuni vs Amazon FSx

Compared 10% of the time

Pure Storage FlashBlade vs Amazon FSx

Compared 10% of the time

More Amazon FSx Competitors

Oracle ZFS vs WekaFS

Compared 40% of the time

Nasuni vs WekaFS

Compared 39% of the time

Cohesity SpanFS vs WekaFS

Compared 3% of the time

Quantum StorNext vs WekaFS

Compared 3% of the time

More WekaFS Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Storage

January 2025

Download Amazon FSx product report

Buyer's Guide

File System Software

February 2025

Download WekaFS product report

Also Known As

Amazon FSx for Windows File Server, Amazon FSx for Lustre

WekaIO Matrix

Overview

Amazon FSx makes it easy and cost effective to launch and run popular file systems. With Amazon FSx, you can leverage the rich feature sets and fast performance of widely-used open source and commercially-licensed file systems, while avoiding time-consuming administrative tasks like hardware provisioning, software configuration, patching, and backups. It provides cost-efficient capacity and high levels of reliability, and it integrates with other AWS services so that you can manage and use the file systems in cloud-native ways.

Amazon FSx provides you with two file systems to choose from: Amazon FSx for Windows File Server for enterprise workloads and Amazon FSx for Lustre for high-performance workloads.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

WekaIO Matrix is the world's fastest shared file system that delivers flash performance at cloud scale and economics. The software runs on any Intel-x86 based server hardware infrastructure on-premises or in the cloud.

WekaIO

Sample Customers

Neiman Marcus, T Mobile, Docxellent, Matrix, Lyell

ZebraMed, Innoviz, TuSimple, Tre Altamira, IEX, iCarbonX, Mellanox, Spookfish, AI Singapore, San Diego Supercomputer Center

Find out what your peers are saying about Nasuni, WekaIO, CTERA and others in File System Software. Updated: February 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best File System Software vendors.

We monitor all File System Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.