Amazon Inspector vs Lacework FortiCNAPP comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Fortinet are both solutions in the Vulnerability Management category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #25 with an average rating of 8.0, while Fortinet is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.2. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 2.9% mindshare in VM, compared to Fortinet’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Fortinet users who would recommend it.

Amazon Inspector

Read 5 Amazon Inspector reviews

1,686 Views
1,465 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Lacework FortiCNAPP

Read 10 Lacework FortiCNAPP reviews

2,131 Views
1,457 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Amazon Inspector

Lacework FortiCNAPP

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 12, 2024

Lacework FortiCNAPP and Amazon Inspector are prominent players in the cloud security arena. Lacework FortiCNAPP holds an advantage with its comprehensive cloud environment oversight and threat detection capabilities.

Features: Lacework FortiCNAPP offers extensive threat detection, compliance management, and analytics capabilities for multi-cloud environments. It excels in anomaly detection and provides valuable compliance insights across frameworks like CIS and NIST. Amazon Inspector is notable for its seamless AWS integration, automated security assessments, and its ability to identify vulnerabilities across AWS workloads. It supports compliance with standards such as HIPAA and PCI, providing a consolidated view of vulnerabilities across containers and server instances.

Room for Improvement: Lacework FortiCNAPP could enhance the clarity of its reports for less technical users and improve integration with third-party tools. It should refine its user interface to better manage complex environments and reduce alert noise. Amazon Inspector might benefit from expanding its capabilities beyond AWS-specific technologies. Improvements could also include more customized compliance rule definitions and enhanced multi-cloud support to compete in broader cloud environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Lacework FortiCNAPP is praised for its deployment ease across various cloud platforms and strong support for diverse environments. It provides seamless onboarding and continuous monitoring capabilities. Amazon Inspector is easy to deploy within AWS, leveraging Amazon’s infrastructure and customer support. While both solutions are efficient, Lacework FortiCNAPP offers greater flexibility across multiple cloud platforms, whereas Amazon Inspector is tailored for AWS.

Pricing and ROI: Lacework FortiCNAPP requires a higher initial investment but offers significant ROI with its comprehensive feature set. Its integrated threat detection and compliance management provide long-term value. Amazon Inspector is cost-effective for AWS users due to its lower entry cost, offering substantial ROI within the AWS ecosystem. Organizations with AWS-centric operations might find Amazon Inspector more budget-friendly, while those needing extensive multi-cloud security solutions could benefit more from Lacework FortiCNAPP's offerings.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon Inspector vs. Lacework FortiCNAPP Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Inspector vs. Lacework FortiCNAPP

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,020 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Inspector

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

25th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Vendor Risk Management (7th)

Lacework FortiCNAPP

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

16th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Container Security (15th), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (13th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (15th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (11th), Compliance Management (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Amazon Inspector is 2.9%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Lacework FortiCNAPP is 1.5%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Vulnerability Management

Featured Reviews

Johnny Suleiman

MS AWS expert at Bespin Global MEA, an e& enterprise Company

Enhance security with detailed vulnerability insights and seamless integration

Amazon Inspector is used for vulnerability assessment and provides detailed reports for infrastructure security. It's primarily used for vulnerability assessments and scans multiple types of resources, providing a report with findings and CVEs Amazon Inspector impacts operations primarily from a…

Read full review

Carlos Vitrano

Cloud security director at Medallia

Provides quick visibility and significantly reduces alerts

Its integrations with third-party SIEMs can be better. That is one of the things that we discussed with them. We have integrations, for instance, with Splunk. The data that we are receiving in Splunk is huge, and it is valid because Lacework has a bunch of data that they can provide to you. However, to be able to import the data and create alerts, we needed to do some work, so integration is one of the things that they can improve. For container security, how they scan images and how they provide results is something that they need to continue improving in terms of visibility. We already have visibility to several artifacts, but they can take that to the next level and see what else they can do. There can be better integrations with CI/CD pipelines. There can be improvements in terms of how we can take action or how we can report from the number of inventories they are providing to us.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The vulnerability discovery is valuable, and they also rank those vulnerabilities for you. So, you could rapidly attack some of the higher, severe vulnerabilities as they pop up, if they do pop up."

"The automated vulnerability detection aspect is most valuable."

"The integration of Amazon Inspector with other AWS services has enhanced our security. Security Hub is a major asset because it allows us to centralize data from various AWS services. We can integrate third-party tools as well. It is just a single-click option."

"The findings dashboards are neat and easy to understand, offering clear demarcations for different types of findings and detailed insights into specific vulnerabilities and their associated instances. It is not a place where everything is dumped together. It offers an easy-to-understand layout."

"Amazon Inspector is highly stable, rated ten out of ten, and this stability impacts business security and administration positively."

"The most valuable feature of Amazon Inspector is the categorization of findings, which filters vulnerabilities by instance, container image, container repository, and Lambda function."

"For the most part, out-of-the-box, it tells you right away about the things you need to work on. I like the fact that it prioritizes alerts based on severity, so that you can focus your efforts on anything that would be critical/high first, moderate second, and work your way down, trying to continue to improve your security posture."

"I find the cloud configuration compliance scanning mature. It generates a lot of data and supports major frameworks like ISO 27001 or SOC 2, providing reports and datasets. Another feature I appreciate is setting custom alerts for specific events. Additionally, I value the agent-based monitoring and scanning for compute nodes. It gives us deeper insights into our workloads and helps identify vulnerabilities across our deployed assets."

"The most valuable feature, from a compliance perspective, is the ability to use Lacework as a platform for multiple compliance standards. We have to meet multiple standards like PCI, SOC 2, CIS, and whatever else is out there. The ability to have reports generated, per security standard, is one of the best features for me."

"The best feature, in my opinion, is the ease of use."

"The most valuable aspects are identifying vulnerabilities—things that are out there that we aren't aware of—as well as finding what path of access attackers could use, and being able to see open SSL or S3 buckets and the like."

"There are many valuable features that I use in my daily work. The first are alerts and the event dossier that it generates, based on the severity. That is very insightful and helps me to have a security cap in our infrastructure. The second thing I like is the agent-based vulnerability management, which is the most accurate information."

"The most valuable feature is Lacework's ability to distill all the security and audit logs. I recommend it to my customers. Normally, when I consult for other customers that are getting into the cloud, we use native security tools. It's more of a rule-based engine."

"Polygraph compliance is a valuable feature. In our perspective, it delivers significant benefits. The clarity it offers, along with the ability to identify and address misconfigurations, is invaluable. When such issues arise, we promptly acknowledge and take action, effectively collaborating with our teams and the responsible parties for those assets. This enables us to promptly manage problems as soon as they arise."

More Lacework FortiCNAPP pros

Cons

"One major area for improvement is remediation. My team works on remediating findings over time, likely using available patches. However, easier integration with Amazon's patching services would be very helpful."

"There is room for improvement in the scanning capabilities. I'd like to see broader coverage in terms of the vulnerabilities detected."

"One area for improvement in Amazon Inspector is the automation aspect."

"There isn't too much to improve right now. Scanning on demand or as a part of the pipeline versus a post pipeline solution would be good, but it is not a deal breaker by any means."

"It has a limited scope. So, AWS Inspector primarily focuses on the security of the EC2 instance. So, if your architecture includes other AWS services, then you may need to use additional tools for your comprehensive security assessment. So that is one con. Another is, like, we have a dependency on agents."

"The solution lacks a cohesive data model, making extracting the necessary data from the platform challenging. It uses its own LQL query language, and each database across different layers and modules is structured differently, complicating correlation efforts. Consequently, I had to create extensive custom reports outside Lacework because their default dashboards didn't communicate risk metrics. They're addressing these issues by redesigning their tools, including introducing the dashboard, which is a step closer to actionable insights but still needs refinement."

"Lacework lacks remediation features, but I believe they're working on that. They're focused on the reporting aspect, but other features need to improve. They're also adding some compliance features, so it's not worth saying they need to get better at it."

"There are a couple of the difficulties we encounter in the realm of cybersecurity, or security as a whole, that relate to potentially limited clarity. Having the capacity to perceive the configuration aspect and having the ability to contribute to it holds substantial advantages, in my view. It ranks high, primarily due to its role in guaranteeing compliance and the potential to uncover vulnerabilities, which could infiltrate the system and introduce potential risks. I had been exploring a specific feature that captured my interest. However, just yesterday, I participated in a product update session that announced the imminent arrival of this feature. The feature involves real-time alerting. This was something I had been anticipating, and it seems that this capability is now being integrated, possibly as part of threat intelligence. While anomaly events consistently and promptly appear in the console, certain alerts tend to experience delays before being displayed. Yet, with the recent product update, this issue is expected to be resolved. Currently, a comprehensive view of all policies is available within the console. However, I want a more tailored display of my compliance posture, focusing specifically on policies relevant to me. For instance, if I'm not subject to HIPAA regulations, I'd prefer not to see the HIPAA compliance details. It's worth noting that even with this request, there exists a filtering mechanism to control the type of compliance information visible. This flexibility provides a workaround to my preference, which is why it's challenging for me to definitively state my exact request."

"Visibility is lacking, and both compliance-related metrics and IAM security control could be improved."

"The biggest thing I would like to see improved is for them to pursue and obtain a FedRAMP moderate authorization... I don't believe they have any immediate plans to get FedRAMP moderate authorized, which is a bit of a challenge for us because we can only use Lacework in our commercial environment."

"I would like to see a remote access assistance feature. And the threat-hunting platform could be better."

"The configuration and setup of alerts should be easier. They should make it easier to integrate with systems like Slack and Datadog. I didn't spend too much time on it, but to me, it wasn't as simple as the alerting that I've seen on other systems."

"Its integrations with third-party SIEMs can be better. That is one of the things that we discussed with them."

More Lacework FortiCNAPP cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is very transparent and clear."

"It is scaled as you go. There are probably a certain number of scans per month, and there are tiers. If you're under a certain tier, it is free. The second level is pennies, and then all the way up to like a million. So, it has a tiered pricing program. They're pretty good with your initial scanning, and there is room to scale based on being affordable, but it is fairly cheap. There are no additional costs. They pretty much think about it as a pay-per-scan type model."

"It's priced according to market standards for its services."

"It is slightly expensive. It depends on how big your environment is, but it is expensive. Right now, we are spending a lot of money. We have covered all of the cloud providers and most of our colocation facilities as well, so we cannot complain, but it is slightly expensive. It is not super expensive."

"My smaller deployments cost around 200,000 a year, which is probably not as expensive as Wiz."

"The pricing has gotten better. That scenario was somewhat unstable. They have a rather interesting licensing structure. I believe you get 200 resources per "Lacework unit." It was difficult, in the beginning, to figure out exactly what a "resource" was... That was a problem until about a year or so ago. They have improved it and it has stabilized quite a bit."

"The licensing fee was approximately $80,000 USD, per year."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,020 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon Inspector?

The integration of Amazon Inspector with other AWS services has enhanced our security. Security Hub is a major asset because it allows us to centralize data from various AWS services. We can integ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon Inspector?

The pricing for Amazon Inspector is very fair, and I would rate it as two out of ten, with ten being the most expensive. It's on the cheaper side.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon Inspector?

One area for improvement in Amazon Inspector is the automation aspect. Automation for scheduling 'turn on' and 'turn off' operations and better integration with CloudWatch for alarms could enhance ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Lacework?

Polygraph compliance is a valuable feature. In our perspective, it delivers significant benefits. The clarity it offers, along with the ability to identify and address misconfigurations, is invalua...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Lacework?

My smaller deployments cost around 200,000 a year, which is probably not as expensive as Wiz.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Lacework?

The solution lacks a cohesive data model, making extracting the necessary data from the platform challenging. It uses its own LQL query language, and each database across different layers and modul...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tenable Vulnerability Management vs Amazon Inspector

Compared 27% of the time

Tenable Nessus vs Amazon Inspector

Compared 18% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Amazon Inspector

Compared 12% of the time

JFrog Xray vs Amazon Inspector

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Secure Score vs Amazon Inspector

Compared 2% of the time

More Amazon Inspector Competitors

Wiz vs Lacework FortiCNAPP

Compared 28% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Lacework FortiCNAPP

Compared 15% of the time

AWS GuardDuty vs Lacework FortiCNAPP

Compared 9% of the time

Aqua Cloud Security Platform vs Lacework FortiCNAPP

Compared 5% of the time

Rapid7 InsightCloudSec vs Lacework FortiCNAPP

Compared 2% of the time

More Lacework FortiCNAPP Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Inspector

January 2025

Download Amazon Inspector product report

Buyer's Guide

Lacework FortiCNAPP

January 2025

Download Lacework FortiCNAPP product report

Also Known As

No data available

Polygraph, FortiCNP

Learn More

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Fortinet

Overview

Amazon Inspector is an automated security assessment service that helps improve the security and compliance of applications deployed on AWS. Amazon Inspector automatically assesses applications for exposure, vulnerabilities, and deviations from best practices. After performing an assessment, Amazon Inspector produces a detailed list of security findings prioritized by level of severity. These findings can be reviewed directly or as part of detailed assessment reports which are available via the Amazon Inspector console or API.

Amazon Inspector security assessments help you check for unintended network accessibility of your Amazon EC2 instances and for vulnerabilities on those EC2 instances. Amazon Inspector assessments are offered to you as pre-defined rules packages mapped to common security best practices and vulnerability definitions. Examples of built-in rules include checking for access to your EC2 instances from the internet, remote root login being enabled, or vulnerable software versions installed. These rules are regularly updated by AWS security researchers.

Lacework FortiCNAPP provides robust cloud security, combining vulnerability management and multi-cloud insight with user-friendly controls, machine learning detection, and compliance support.

Lacework FortiCNAPP specializes in cloud security by merging machine learning anomaly detection with agent-based vulnerability management to offer detailed alerts and compliance reports. Its comprehensive approach allows continuous monitoring across AWS and Kubernetes, providing insights from an attacker's perspective. The platform offers automation and seamless Slack integration, facilitating collaborative and efficient cloud security management. Users value its ability to handle multi-cloud environments and scan IAC scripts, configurations, and compute nodes across AWS and GCP.

What are the key features?

Machine Learning Detection: Identifies anomalies effectively.
Compliance Reports: Provides precise compliance documentation.
Vulnerability Management: Supports agent-based vulnerability assessments.
Multi-Cloud Support: Manages and secures across multiple cloud providers.
Automation and Collaboration: Enables integration with Slack for streamlined communication.
Custom Alerts: Allows creation of personalized alerts for better focus.

What benefits do users expect?

Reduced Alert Noise: Minimizes distractions with filtered alerts.
Efficient Cloud Security: Automates processes for enhanced security management.
Collaboration Support: Integrates with tools like Slack.
Insightful Perspective: Provides insight from an attacker's viewpoint.

Organizations across sectors leverage Lacework FortiCNAPP for cloud security, focusing on compliance, security posture, and vulnerability management. It is widely used for monitoring AWS and Kubernetes environments, scanning IAC scripts, configurations, and securing compute nodes. It supports multi-cloud security posture management and log ingestion, enabling companies to maintain strong cloud infrastructures without dedicated security layers.

Sample Customers

betterment, caplinked, flatiron, university of nutri dame

J.Crew, AdRoll, Snowflake, VMWare, Iterable, Pure Storage, TrueCar, NerdWallet, and more.

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Inspector vs. Lacework FortiCNAPP

January 2025

Free Report: Amazon Inspector vs. Lacework FortiCNAPP

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Inspector vs. Lacework FortiCNAPP and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,020 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon Inspector vs. Lacework FortiCNAPP report.

See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.