Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amazon Inspector vs Orca Security comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
8.5
Amazon Inspector offers reliable customer service, with varying response times based on subscription tier, ensuring user satisfaction.
Sentiment score
7.5
Orca Security's support is efficient, praised for competence and communication, with room for improvement and real-time Slack interaction.
I have not needed to use AWS support for Inspector, which indicates that the service is almost perfect.
I would rate the quality of support as nine stars out of ten due to their quick and helpful responses.
The expertise levels could be improved.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
5.6
Amazon Inspector needs better integration, expanded vulnerability coverage, real-time protection, automation, and improved guidance for comprehensive security.
Sentiment score
5.5
Orca Security needs enhanced UI, alerts, integrations, coverage, and improved communication, education, and documentation to meet user demands.
Automation for scheduling 'turn on' and 'turn off' operations and better integration with CloudWatch for alarms could enhance the service's functionality.
Another improvement is in handling alerts for multiple files with the same CVE; it should provide an option to manage each file separately without affecting others.
It should also increase its capability to ingest data from other security tools like CloudSight for endpoint detection and provide real-time monitoring.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
Amazon Inspector offers scalable vulnerability monitoring with ECR integration, popular among security teams but sometimes limited for developers.
Sentiment score
8.3
Orca Security excels in scalable, agentless cloud security, efficiently managing diverse environments and workloads across major cloud providers.
Scalability is not an issue with Amazon Inspector as it is scalable to the maximum, covering any business scale effectively.
When you onboard an organization, Orca will find new projects, folders, and resources without any additional effort required.
Orca Security's scalability is rated nine out of ten due to its challenge in scaling Kubernetes workloads.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Amazon Inspector offers a cost-effective, tiered pricing model with transparent, low-cost scans suitable for diverse organizational needs.
No sentiment score available
Orca Security's flexible, asset-based pricing model may be costly for small businesses, but offers negotiable and inclusive licenses.
The pricing for Amazon Inspector is very fair, and I would rate it as two out of ten, with ten being the most expensive.
The initial price seemed high, however, after negotiation, the final price was ideal.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
9.5
Amazon Inspector is highly stable and reliable, receiving excellent user support and impacting business security positively.
Sentiment score
7.5
Orca Security is highly stable, with minor issues mostly resolved promptly, earning high reliability ratings from users.
Amazon Inspector is highly stable, rated ten out of ten, and this stability impacts business security and administration positively.
There were some stability issues in the initial months of using Orca Security.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.2
Amazon Inspector offers automated vulnerability detection, categorization, and Security Hub integration for enhanced AWS security assessment across resources.
Sentiment score
8.5
Orca Security enhances cloud security with agentless deployment, vulnerability prioritization, and seamless CI/CD integration, offering comprehensive protection.
The most valuable feature of Amazon Inspector is the categorization of findings, which filters vulnerabilities by instance, container image, container repository, and Lambda function.
Additionally, it covers a large scope of vulnerabilities, CVEs, malware, and misconfiguration.
It provided us with visibility from a central point, increasing our view from the previous thirty percent to a full one hundred percent of our cloud environment.
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Inspector
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
24th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.0
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
IT Vendor Risk Management (9th)
Orca Security
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
11th
Average Rating
9.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
Container Security (14th), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (11th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (9th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (9th), Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) (6th), Cloud Detection and Response (CDR) (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Amazon Inspector is 2.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Orca Security is 5.0%, down from 5.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Vulnerability Management
 

Featured Reviews

Nikhil Sehgal - PeerSpot reviewer
Primarily focuses on security of EC2 instances, provides point-in-time assessments rather than real time protection but provides automated vulnerability detection
It has a limited scope. So, AWS Inspector primarily focuses on the security of the EC2 instance. So, if your architecture includes other AWS services, then you may need to use additional tools for your comprehensive security assessment. So that is one con. Another is, like, we have a dependency on agents. So other is dependency on agents, like, Inspector relies on agents installed on instances for deeper assessment. So managing these agents can be additional overhead. So these kinds of things. It does not even provide real-time protection. So, Inspector provides point-in-time assessment rather than continuous monitoring. So these are all cons. When it comes to false positives, it is there for most security tools as of now. I would not consider false positives a major concern. So, these are the major concerns that I found: dependency on agents, limited scope, and no real-time protection.
Cédric Thian-Meng - PeerSpot reviewer
It contacts your account provider and fetches metadata, eliminating the need for snapshots or reserved space to copy client infrastructure
Orca Security has patented technologies. It's an agentless solution, so you don't need to install an agent. Instead, it contacts your account provider and fetches metadata, eliminating the need for snapshots or reserved space to copy client infrastructure. The multi-cloud capability displays essential information and potential vulnerabilities with granular detail. For instance, it identifies paths that attackers might exploit to gain root or admin access to machines. It is comprehensive, covering a wide range of software needs. They also integrate with CI/CD pipelines, enabling developers to ensure security from the early stages of code deployment. This integration provides a 100% guarantee on security, safeguarding images, configurations, and other crucial information throughout the development process.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Government
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
University
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon Inspector?
The integration of Amazon Inspector with other AWS services has enhanced our security. Security Hub is a major asset because it allows us to centralize data from various AWS services. We can integ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon Inspector?
The pricing is very transparent and clear, so I don't have any challenges with it. It's good.
What needs improvement with Amazon Inspector?
There is room for improvement in the scanning capabilities. I'd like to see broader coverage in terms of the vulnerabilities detected. Right now, it's not as comprehensive as some of the third-part...
What do you like most about Orca Security?
It's for protection. It's an agentless tool. We don't need to install anything at a customer's premises. We can just scan the entire assets in the cloud.
What needs improvement with Orca Security?
The company is managed by industry veterans. It's a cloud-based product. They handle misconfigurations and analyse your runtime to detect malware. They're at the forefront regarding developer secur...
What is your primary use case for Orca Security?
We use the solution to show misconfiguration. Often, users lack knowledge about their assets' fingerprints and their cloud provider's configurations.
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

betterment, caplinked, flatiron, university of nutri dame
BeyondTrust, Postman, Digital Turbine, Solarisbank, Lemonade, C6 Bank, Docebo, Vercel, and Vivino
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Inspector vs. Orca Security and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.