Amazon QLDB vs MongoDB comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and MongoDB are both solutions in the NoSQL Databases category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.0, while MongoDB is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.1. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 0.5% mindshare in ND, compared to MongoDB’s 20.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of MongoDB users who would recommend it.

Amazon QLDB

Read 1 Amazon QLDB review

165 Views
77 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

MongoDB

Read 78 MongoDB reviews

4,725 Views
3,573 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Amazon QLDB

MongoDB

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon QLDB and MongoDB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, ScyllaDB, Microsoft and others in NoSQL Databases.

To learn more, read our detailed NoSQL Databases Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

NoSQL Databases

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 832,765 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon QLDB

Ranking in NoSQL Databases

15th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

MongoDB

Ranking in NoSQL Databases

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Open Source Databases (5th), Managed NoSQL Databases (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the NoSQL Databases category, the mindshare of Amazon QLDB is 0.5%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MongoDB is 20.6%, down from 26.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NoSQL Databases

Featured Reviews

Balasubramanyam Kamarapu

Technical Architect at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

A fast and affordable solution that is scalable and has a nice dashboard

The product enables the users to query results faster. It maintains all the versions of the changes done on a specific node. A traditional blockchain would take time, but Amazon QLDB is a bit faster. We have to do many operations in blockchain to read data, but QLDB comes with an easy syntax. The product provides a nice dashboard to view all the information.

Read full review

Hamidul Islam

Senior Consultant at Infosys

Lightweight with good flexibility and very fast performance for searching data

I used the solution in the production level to search data and create education-based tutorials for a project. We had 30 managers, senior architects, tech leads, and software engineers working on the project. Currently, I use the solution for my personal work. The solution has good flexibility…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product enables the users to query results faster."

"Migrating to MongoDB upgrades the IT environment and puts users in the NoSQL environment, which is faster."

"The most valuable features of MongoDB are the variety of translations available and the ability to deploy it on the cloud is useful. The cloud users can access the data, work on the data, and if they want to import or manipulate some data they can."

"Sharding is an excellent feature of MongoDB."

"One of the most valuable features of MongoDB is it is Its open source."

"It has visible benefits, actually, in terms of price of ownership if you compare it to, for example, Oracle."

"We've found the product to be scalable."

"MongoDB is flexible and it allows other applications to be added."

"The most valuable feature of MongoDB is the ease of connections, aggregation, and queries."

More MongoDB pros

Cons

"The product should enable users to import data from various databases."

"The dashboard is an area of concern in the solution where improvements are required."

"Some of the solution's transaction capabilities can be improved."

"At the start, connecting to the database via Compass or through a direct ID was a challenge."

"Enhancing the documentation to make it more beginner-friendly is crucial."

"There are some problems with bugs appearing in sharding when the data is too high."

"It would help if MongoDB offered a light solution for small projects."

"The performance can be improved."

"I don't see a lot of areas that need improvement."

More MongoDB cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is not expensive."

"At the moment, all customers are using the community version."

"MongoDB's pricing is not reasonable, but it is not as expensive as the others."

"MongoDB is not expensive."

"It is rather expensive."

"The product is affordable."

"I believe that the licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"MongoDB is a bit expensive compared to its competitors."

"It's a community edition, so we do not pay anything."

More MongoDB pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

832,765 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

14%

University

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon QLDB?

The product enables the users to query results faster.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon QLDB?

The product is not expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon QLDB?

The product should enable users to import data from various databases. It would be a nice additional improvement. It should also provide more instances.

See all answers

What do you like most about MongoDB?

MongoDB's approach to handling data in documents rather than traditional tables has been particularly beneficial.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MongoDB?

MongoDB is free of charge. that said, there is also a paid version. We use both free and paid versions.

See all answers

What needs improvement with MongoDB?

If something is wrong on the cluster, then you need to contact the support team. The stability could be better.

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

InfluxDB vs MongoDB

Compared 25% of the time

Couchbase vs MongoDB

Compared 14% of the time

Cassandra vs MongoDB

Compared 8% of the time

Milvus vs MongoDB

Compared 6% of the time

Faiss vs MongoDB

Compared 5% of the time

More MongoDB Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NoSQL Databases

January 2025

Download Amazon QLDB product report

Buyer's Guide

MongoDB

January 2025

Download MongoDB product report

Also Known As

Amazon Quantum Ledger Database

No data available

Overview

Amazon QLDB is a fully managed ledger database that provides a transparent, immutable, and cryptographically verifiable transaction log ‎owned by a central trusted authority. Amazon QLDB tracks each and every application data change and maintains a complete and verifiable history of changes over time.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

MongoDB is a flexible and scalable NoSQL database solution that efficiently handles both structured and unstructured data. It is known for its ease of use, JSON capabilities, and efficient data handling, making it ideal for developer-friendly environments.

MongoDB stands out with features like sharding, geospatial indexing, and its open-source nature. Users find it fast and appreciate its seamless integration into different applications. Despite being powerful, it remains straightforward to set up and use, bolstered by a clustering and aggregation framework that enhances its functionality. While generally appreciated for its cost-effectiveness and broad application compatibility, there is room for improvement in security, enterprise integration, and the creation of more robust training and documentation resources. Enhancing performance and adding support for traditional relational database concepts could also prove beneficial.

What are MongoDB's most important features?

Scalability: Efficiently manages growing data volumes.
Flexibility: Supports structured and unstructured data with ease.
Sharding: Distributes data across multiple servers.
Geospatial Indexing: Enables location-based data handling.
Open-source: Wide community support and customization.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Cost-effectiveness: Reduces overall database management expenses.
Ease of Use: Simplifies database setup and maintenance.
Developer-friendly: Accelerates application development with supportive tools.
Scalable Solutions: Adapts to evolving business requirements.

MongoDB finds widespread application across industries like healthcare, logistics, and telecommunications. It efficiently powers IoT platforms, data analytics, and document management systems. Its schema flexibility and JSON storage capabilities make it ideal for real-time processing and multi-server databases, essential for handling large-scale data volumes in modern applications.

MongoDB

Sample Customers

accenture, digital asset, health direct, klarna, osano, realm, smaato, splunk, wipro, zilliant

Facebook, MetLife, City of Chicago, Expedia, eBay, Google

Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, ScyllaDB, Microsoft and others in NoSQL Databases. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

832,765 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.

We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.