We performed a comparison between Amazon QLDB and MongoDB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases."The product enables the users to query results faster."
"MongoDB is fast and efficient."
"We haven't had any issues with stability."
"We can define security rules at the database level or the cluster level to grant or deny access to particular users."
"The most valuable feature is the geometric information done with GeoJSON."
"I think that MongoDB isn't too structured, and that's good for our technical team because they are able to search through the database better than if they are using SQL Server."
"It stores historical data with ease. For example, if you are a healthcare member, then you will have multiple records of visits to the doctors. To store such data in Oracle Database, you have to create many records. You might also have duplication problems because your records are going in again and again, because of which the data warehouse and the maintenance cost will be huge. MongoDB is comparatively lightweight. It is a JSON extract. Once you define a schema and extract it, you can push all the relationships in any way you want. It is easier to define and get different types of transactions into MongoDB. It is also easier to set it up as compared to other solutions. MongoDB is a NoSQL database, which means it is a document DB in which you can store documents that you created in BSON. It is pretty fast in response. It is faster than relational databases because it does not define any primary keys, secondary keys, tertiary keys, and all those kinds of things."
"I value the API integrations."
"It is convenient to use because we can do manipulations with the JSON data that we get. There are also a lot of joins and associations with MongoDB, which makes it easy to use for us."
"The product should enable users to import data from various databases."
"I don't see a lot of areas that need improvement."
"The solution could have more integration."
"The improvements could be made to intelligence to detect disk storage and prevent MongoDB from crashing."
"The performance could be faster."
"I have found the solution difficult to operate as an administrator."
"The performance of the solution could be improved."
"The MongoDB documentation can be a little complicated sometimes."
"The solution can be a bit tough to set up if you don't have knowledge about how the database works."
Amazon QLDB is ranked 11th in NoSQL Databases with 1 review while MongoDB is ranked 1st in NoSQL Databases with 70 reviews. Amazon QLDB is rated 8.0, while MongoDB is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Amazon QLDB writes "A fast and affordable solution that is scalable and has a nice dashboard". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MongoDB writes "Lightweight with good flexibility and very fast performance for searching data". Amazon QLDB is most compared with , whereas MongoDB is most compared with InfluxDB, Couchbase, ScyllaDB, Cassandra and Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop.
See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.