Anaconda vs IBM SPSS Modeler comparison

Anaconda and IBM are both solutions in the Data Science Platforms category. Anaconda is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.8, while IBM is ranked #13 with an average rating of 6.8. Anaconda holds a 2.1% mindshare in Data Science Platforms, compared to IBM’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Anaconda users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Anaconda

Read 18 Anaconda reviews

1,469 Views
1,198 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

IBM SPSS Modeler

Read 39 IBM SPSS Modeler reviews

1,793 Views
1,459 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Anaconda

IBM SPSS Modeler

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 5, 2024

IBM SPSS Modeler and Anaconda are both players in the data science and machine learning platform category. IBM SPSS Modeler has the advantage in user-friendliness and comprehensive support, while Anaconda is preferred for its rich feature set and cost-effectiveness.

Features: IBM SPSS Modeler provides tailored predictive analytics and easy integration with the IBM ecosystem. It facilitates a streamlined analysis process with pre-built models and advanced statistical functions. Anaconda supports numerous machine learning libraries, offers high customization, and is adaptable for complex data projects, thanks to extensive open-source language support.

Room for Improvement: IBM SPSS Modeler can enhance its visual modeling capabilities and integration with third-party visualization tools. More focus on modern governance and security features would be beneficial, as well as increasing the flexibility of automation capabilities. Anaconda could improve by optimizing its GUI for users less familiar with coding, offering more built-in analytics models, and refining the management of environments for a smoother user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM SPSS Modeler boasts easy deployment processes and comprehensive customer service for enterprises. Its integration with existing systems is facilitated by dedicated support. Anaconda presents a straightforward installation but leans more towards community-driven assistance, offering flexibility in deployment with less emphasis on official customer service.

Pricing and ROI: IBM SPSS Modeler involves a high initial setup cost but promises significant ROI through efficient analytics operations. Anaconda, being open-source, provides a cost-effective alternative for businesses, supporting better long-term ROI with reduced licensing fees when leveraging open-source solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Anaconda vs. IBM SPSS Modeler Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Anaconda vs. IBM SPSS Modeler

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,040 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Anaconda

Ranking in Data Science Platforms

11th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM SPSS Modeler

Ranking in Data Science Platforms

13th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Mining (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Data Science Platforms category, the mindshare of Anaconda is 2.1%, down from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM SPSS Modeler is 2.4%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Science Platforms

Featured Reviews

Rohan Sharma

AI/ML Co-Lead at Developer Student Clubs - GGV

Provides all the frameworks and makes it easy to create environments for multiple projects

The best thing is that it provides all the frameworks and makes it easy to create environments for multiple projects using Anaconda. It is easy for a beginner to learn to use Anaconda. Comparatively, it is easier than using virtual environments or other environments because of the Conda environment. However, there are many things in Anaconda that people need to be aware of, so it can be challenging.

Read full review

PeterHuo

Application Architect at Canada Border Services Agency

Good tool for extracting data from data warehouses, creating streams, and manipulating logic to extract final data

There are performance issues. Extracting data from many combined tables can take hours and occasionally crash the server due to memory leaks. This performance problem bothers people. The performance issue seems to be related to the server. We design streams on the client and submit them to the server, which generates a large SQL statement. There are two potential bottlenecks: one in the server and another in data extraction. I'm unsure about the exact mechanics of data splitting when fetching from the database. When streams become larger, performance bottlenecks may occur in the IBM SPSS Modeler server or the database. Sometimes the server crashes and needs to be restarted to release memory on both sides. I'm not sure exactly where the problem is caused, as I focus on stream design rather than server issues. The problem could be on the IBM SPSS Modeler server and database.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the Jupyter notebook that allows us to write the Python code, compile it on the fly, and then look at the results."

"It's interesting. It's user friendly. That's what makes it outstanding among the others. It has a collection of R, Python, and others. Their platform strategy has a collection of many other visualization tools, apart from Spyder and RStudio, which is really helpful for data science. For any data science professional, Anaconda is really handy. It has almost all the tools for data science."

"It provides a unified platform where you can install Jupyter, Python Spider, and other related tools without needing separate installations."

"The best part of Anaconda is the media distribution that comes as part of it. It gets us started very quickly."

"The notebook feature is an improvement over RStudio."

"It has a lot of functionality available, supports many libraries, and the developers are continually improving it."

"It helped us find find the optimal area for where our warehouse should be located."

"The solution is stable."

More Anaconda pros

"IBM was chosen because of usability. It's point and click, whereas the other out-of-the box-solution, or open-source solutions, require full-on programming and a much higher skill level."

"New algorithms are added into every version of Modeler, e.g., SMOTE, random forest, etc. The Derive node is used for the syntax code to derive the data."

"It scales. I have not run into any challenges where it will not perform."

"In the solution, I like the virtualization of data flow since it shows what goes where, which is mostly the strength of the tool."

"We use analytics with the visual modeling capability to leverage productivity improvements."

"It is pretty scalable."

"The most valuable features of the IBM SPSS Modeler are visual programming, you don't have to write any code, and it is easy to use. 90 to 95 percent of the use cases, you don't have to fine-tune anything. If you want to do something deeper, for example, create a better neural network, then you have to go into the features and try to fine-tune them. However, the default selection which is made by the tool, it's very practical and works well."

"It makes pretty good use of memory. There are algorithms take a long time to run in R, and somehow they run more efficiently in Modeler."

More IBM SPSS Modeler pros

Cons

"Anaconda consumes a significant amount of processing memory when working on it."

"Anaconda should be optimized for RAM consumption."

"It crashes once in a while. In case of a reboot or something unexpected, the unseen code part will get diminished, and it relatively takes longer than other applications when a reboot is happening. They can improve in these areas. They can also bring some database software. They have software for analytics and virtualization. However, they don't have any software for the database."

"I think better documentation or a step-by-step guide for installation would help, especially for on-premise users."

"When you install Anaconda for the first time, it's really difficult to update it."

"It also takes up a lot of space."

"Anaconda can't handle heavy workloads."

"One feature that I would like to see is being able to use a different language in a different cell, which would allow me to mix R and Python together."

More Anaconda cons

"There are performance issues. Extracting data from many combined tables can take hours and occasionally crash the server due to memory leaks. This performance problem bothers people. The performance issue seems to be related to the server. We design streams on the client and submit them to the server, which generates a large SQL statement. There are two potential bottlenecks: one in the server and another in data extraction. I'm unsure about the exact mechanics of data splitting when fetching from the database."

"C&DS will not meet our scalability needs."

"The integration with sources and visualisation needs some improvement. The scalability needs improvement."

"Requires more development."

"It is very good, but slow. The slowness may be because we have not finalized all the background information in SPSS. It still needs some tweaking."

"I would not rate the technical support very well. The technicians have accents. When you do find someone, it is very hard to get somebody able to answer the technical questions."

"We would like to see better visualizations and easier integration with Cognos Analytics for reporting."

"Formula writing is not straightforward for an Excel user. Totally new set of functions, which takes time to learn and teach."

More IBM SPSS Modeler cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"My company uses the free version of the tool. There is also a paid version of the tool available."

"The licensing costs for Anaconda are reasonable."

"The product is open-source and free to use."

"The tool is open-source."

"Anaconda is free to use, but in terms of hardware costs, you might need heavy GPUs to run CUDA and other demanding tasks."

"If you are in a university and the license is free then you can use the tool without any charges, which is good."

"It got us a good amount of money with quick and efficient modeling."

"$5,000 annually."

"When you are close to end of quarter, IBM and its partners can get you 60% to 70% discounts, so literally wait for the last day of the quarter for the best prices. You may feel like you are getting robbed if you can't receive a good discount."

"It is a huge increase to time savings."

"Its price is okay for a company, but for personal use, it is considered somewhat expensive."

"Having in mind all four tools from Garner’s top quadrant, the pricing of this tool is competitive and it reflects the quality that it offers."

"I am using the free version of IBM SPSS Modeler, it is the educational edition version."

More IBM SPSS Modeler pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Science Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

University

Financial Services Firm

13%

Educational Organization

12%

University

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Anaconda?

The tool's most valuable feature is its cloud-based nature, allowing accessibility from anywhere. Additionally, using Jupyter Notebook makes it easy to handle bugs and errors.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Anaconda?

Anaconda does not require a pricing structure, and it is available as an open-source tool. The features of Python, Jupyter, and others are free to use.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Anaconda?

Anaconda consumes a significant amount of processing memory when working on it. This is something that needs improvement as it can impact performance.

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM SPSS Modeler?

Compared to other tools, the product works much easier to analyze data without coding.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM SPSS Modeler?

The government has funds and a budget, it's hard to say if it's expensive or cheap. In Canada, they have a yearly budget. They used to encourage people to use the modeler for development. If ten us...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM SPSS Modeler?

See all answers

Comparisons

Databricks vs Anaconda

Compared 35% of the time

Amazon SageMaker vs Anaconda

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Power BI vs Anaconda

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio vs Anaconda

Compared 7% of the time

KNIME vs Anaconda

Compared 5% of the time

More Anaconda Competitors

Microsoft Power BI vs IBM SPSS Modeler

Compared 29% of the time

IBM SPSS Statistics vs IBM SPSS Modeler

Compared 20% of the time

KNIME vs IBM SPSS Modeler

Compared 17% of the time

Altair RapidMiner vs IBM SPSS Modeler

Compared 7% of the time

Alteryx vs IBM SPSS Modeler

Compared 6% of the time

More IBM SPSS Modeler Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Anaconda

March 2025

Download Anaconda product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM SPSS Modeler

March 2025

Download IBM SPSS Modeler product report

Also Known As

No data available

SPSS Modeler

Overview

Anaconda makes it easy for you to install and maintain Python environments. Our development team tests to ensure compatibility of Python packages in Anaconda. We support and provide open source assurance for packages in Anaconda to mitigate your risk in using open source and meet your regulatory compliance requirements.

Python is the fastest growing language for data science. Anaconda includes 720+ Python open source packages and now includes essential R packages. This powerful combination allows you to do everything you want from BI to advanced modeling on complex Big Data

Anaconda

IBM SPSS Modeler is an extensive predictive analytics platform that is designed to bring predictive intelligence to decisions made by individuals, groups, systems and the enterprise. By providing a range of advanced algorithms and techniques that include text analytics, entity analytics, decision management and optimization, SPSS Modeler can help you consistently make the right decisions from the desktop or within operational systems.

Buy
https://www.ibm.com/products/spss-modeler/pricing

Sign up for the trial
https://www.ibm.com/account/reg/us-en/signup?formid=urx-19947

IBM

Sample Customers

LinkedIn, NASA, Boeing, JP Morgan, Recursion Pharmaceuticals, DARPA, Microsoft, Amazon, HP, Cisco, Thomson Reuters, IBM, Bridgestone

Reisebªro Idealtours GmbH, MedeAnalytics, Afni, Israel Electric Corporation, Nedbank Ltd., DigitalGlobe, Vodafone Hungary, Aegon Hungary, Bureau Veritas, Brammer Group, Florida Department of Juvenile Justice, InSites Consulting, Fortis Turkey

Buyer's Guide

Anaconda vs. IBM SPSS Modeler

March 2025

Free Report: Anaconda vs. IBM SPSS Modeler

Find out what your peers are saying about Anaconda vs. IBM SPSS Modeler and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Anaconda vs. IBM SPSS Modeler report.

See our list of best Data Science Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Data Science Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.