Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Android SDK vs Bitbar comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Android SDK
Ranking in Mobile App Platforms
1st
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
8.9
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Bitbar
Ranking in Mobile App Platforms
12th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Functional Testing Tools (26th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Mobile App Platforms category, the mindshare of Android SDK is 26.4%, down from 27.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Bitbar is 2.4%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Mobile App Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

Zain Omer - PeerSpot reviewer
A stable and scalable product that offers ease of coding and designing to build applications
There isn't a need for any improvement in Android SDK since they provide users with two or three updates in a year, making it quite stable. The security part in Android SDK depends on how you build an application using the tool so you can apply some security to your application. The reason why Temenos Quantum is the best security tool is because it uses a middleware named Fabric, so the APIs are connected from Fabric to Temenos Quantum. The middleware offered by Temenos is really strong. If I compare the security offered by Android to that of Temenos Quantum, Android will lose in terms of security. You can create a secure application with Android SDK. The amount of security offered by Android SDK is less when compared to Temenos, making it an area of concern where improvement can be made. I don't think Android SDK needs to add any features because they give updates frequently.
it_user1267398 - PeerSpot reviewer
Has the ability to use different frameworks for testing although it is lacking in capability options
Setup depends on how you are using the product. In our case, it was quite simple. We did it ourselves and it didn't take much time, maybe a day. We used one person per team for setup, usually an engineer or developer. For each team, we had one person to assist with deployment. We have multiple teams so each team had someone dealing with setup. We now have two people working in the company who deal with the maintenance of the solution.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is a stable product."
"I have found the functions related to the services to the community for applications to be the most valuable."
"The look, ease of use, sturdiness, and reliability are excellent."
"Supports mobile and IOT devices."
"Android SDK is very scalable, secure, and fast...It is a completely stable solution that has been working for many years."
"The Near Field Communication feature is its most valuable feature."
"The best thing about Android SDK is its extensive graphics compared to iOS."
"Android SDK's best feature is its ease of use."
"Ability to use different frameworks."
"Game testing and the API for apps are good."
 

Cons

"Google has a monopoly on tools for Android app development, so Android SDK is the only choice available."
"The amount of security offered by Android SDK is less when compared to Temenos, making it an area of concern where improvement can be made."
"It would be nice to get fewer updates."
"Android SDK could use some new features, for example, picture-in-picture."
"The development environment of Android SDK could improve."
"The security implementation is the only area of concern in Android SDK where a bit of enhancements can help."
"There are security issues in the Android platform."
"We encounter compatibility issues between the product and the device from the manufacturer."
"Lacking capability options that can be directly integrated."
"Their pricing structure is complicated and can be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Many countries, even those with fewer resources, prefer using Android SDK because it is cheap."
"Android SDK is essentially an open-source product on which anybody can work."
"Android SDK can be cheap and can go high in terms of prices, and it all depends on who the customers are and what kind of application you want. One application may cost 5,000 USD and can go up from 1,00,000 to 2,00,000 USD."
"It is an open-source platform."
"I am using the free version of Android SDK."
"The pricing is complicated. It's in the middle."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile App Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
13%
Real Estate/Law Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Insurance Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Android SDK?
The Near Field Communication feature is its most valuable feature.
What needs improvement with Android SDK?
We encounter compatibility issues between the product and the device from the manufacturer. There are some limitations on Google Play Store availability as well. These particular areas need improve...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
Testdroid
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Rovio, Paf, Supercell, NITRO Games, Seriously, AVG, Google, Bosch, Yahoo, Microsoft, Yandex, Mozilla, eBay, PayPal, TESCO, Cisco WebEx, Facebook, LinkedIn, skype, Subway
Find out what your peers are saying about Android SDK vs. Bitbar and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.