Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Angles Professional vs Dundas BI comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Angles Professional
Ranking in Data Visualization
34th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Dundas BI
Ranking in Data Visualization
25th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
21
Ranking in other categories
Embedded BI (11th)
 

Featured Reviews

Use Angles Professional?
Share your opinion
Ishwar Saswade - PeerSpot reviewer
Has a lot of integration and visualization options, but can't be easily used by business users, and working with the color palette is difficult
With Dundas BI, we do not have end-users apart from the developers. End-users do not find it easy to create their own reports. Most of the implementations I have seen require a developer team for creating the visuals, and they then give them to end-users. A self-serve part where end-users or business users can create their own reports would help in terms of the adoption of Dundas BI. Currently, business users find it difficult to work with Dundas BI because there are so many settings that they don't know what they need to do. Even when a developer starts working on Dundas BI, he needs to spend at least one month or so getting used to the functionalities of Dundas BI. Even then, it is not easy to remember where or how they made a certain property change. It takes at least one month for a developer to get acquainted with it. Working with the color palette is difficult in Dundas BI. They can work on different color palettes and make them organized and user-friendly. It would help a long way. Most of the time, the users face challenges in assigning colors to the fields that they have created or to the dimensions and measures in a chart. Dundas can further reduce the number of settings they have. When you create any chart in Dundas, you get a lot of features to control each setting, which is pretty useful for BI, but for end-users, it is difficult to identify the exact settings to change a property. I would love it if some of the options come pre-selected. If some of the settings are set to best practices by default, it will be helpful. Whenever we have any issues, the error messages that we get in Dundas BI are not very helpful in identifying the root cause. Making these changes will bring a lot of change to the end-user experience.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Visualization solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Government
15%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Educational Organization
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with Dundas BI?
It would be helpful if Dundas made the UI more user-friendly like the leading tools and decreased the learning curve. It should be simpler for a beginner to build dashboards.
What is your primary use case for Dundas BI?
We use Dundas to report on machine sensor data and create dashboards.
What advice do you have for others considering Dundas BI?
I rate Dundas BI seven out of 10. It should be simpler to use. I'm sure there are lots of knowledge-base articles that might help, but the process is still complex. you need to build cubes and thin...
 

Also Known As

Magnitude Angles, Magnitude Noetix Analytics
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Cisco, VISA, Darden, Harvard University, Netflix, Nordstrom
Coca Cola, Siemens, Verizon, Microsoft, Pitney Bowes, Scotiabank, Pepperidge Farm, Shutterstock, Norwegian Government, Boeing, Guess Inc., BP, Bayer
Find out what your peers are saying about Salesforce, Qlik, Splunk and others in Data Visualization. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.