Anritsu Oscilloscopes vs Keysight Oscilloscopes comparison

Anritsu and Keysight Technologies are both solutions in the Oscilloscopes category. Anritsu is ranked #8, while Keysight Technologies is ranked #4. Anritsu holds a 1.8% mindshare in O, compared to Keysight Technologies’s 14.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Anritsu users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Keysight Technologies users who would recommend it.

Anritsu Oscilloscopes

Read 6 Anritsu Oscilloscopes reviews

334 Views
334 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Keysight Oscilloscopes

Read 23 Keysight Oscilloscopes reviews

2,012 Views
2,012 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Anritsu Oscilloscopes

Keysight Oscilloscopes

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Anritsu Oscilloscopes and Keysight Oscilloscopes based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Oscilloscopes solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Anritsu Oscilloscopes vs. Keysight Oscilloscopes Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Anritsu Oscilloscopes vs. Keysight Oscilloscopes

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 883,011 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Anritsu Oscilloscopes

Ranking in Oscilloscopes

8th

Average Rating

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Keysight Oscilloscopes

Ranking in Oscilloscopes

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Oscilloscopes category, the mindshare of Anritsu Oscilloscopes is 1.8%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Keysight Oscilloscopes is 14.2%, up from 10.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Oscilloscopes Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Keysight Oscilloscopes	14.2%
Anritsu Oscilloscopes	1.8%
Other	84.0%

Oscilloscopes

Featured Reviews

IcValida9f6e

IC Validation Engineer at a manufacturing company with 51-200 employees

The Pulse Pattern Generator and Error Detector are co-located, making it easier to use. However, I would like a better GUI.

Take a look and do some demos. It will help you decide whether to go with this equipment or not. It took us about a week to become acclimated to the solution. We are not using this product to support connected devices, e.g., IoT development, nor are we planning to going forward.

Read full review

Amit Chowdhry

Principal at a tech services company with 1-10 employees

The technical support ecosystem is what really makes it good.

Because they're such a big industry standard name, their products are standardized across many customers, which is why people own these products. The customer support is very good. If you need an application to do any measurement, you can easily get a hold of people to help you with it. This is a whole ecosystem. The user interface is top-notch in the industry.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is its frequency range."

"The jitter function included into the system has helped me in terms of improving the capabilities of our product."

"The Pulse Pattern Generator (PPG) and Error Detector are co-located, which makes it easier to use because I can just probe it directly on the PCB."

"We can extract signal loss, skew, DKDF... and the tool is very flexible."

"The user interface is easy, simple, and practical."

"It supports the PAM-4 encoding scheme. We use that to do our PAM-4 receiver validation."

"It gives you the capability to increase the Tap levels and voltage strength more than what you have in your signal."

"The user interface is very user-friendly. You can use a lot of functions in their scope and will provide them for you. You can update the scope's software by asking Keysight to update the software when you want."

"The most valuable features are its quality and reliability... The good thing about the GUI interface which is, of course, software-based, is that you can record and save your test setup."

"The user interface is nice. It describes the output well, so it's easy to use."

"Before silicon came back, our customers' performance was affected. Using these tools, we are able to deliver performance to our customers."

"The user interface is simple and straightforward, so I can easily measure frequency, time, and other complex measurements."

"We rely on the data and we make our design calls, risk-assessment, all based on the measurements that we take with the Keysight equipment."

"It breaks down all the parameters that we need to look at."

"It does everything that I need it to with the PLTS software and the network analyzer software."

More Keysight Oscilloscopes pros

Cons

"Right now, it's a minimal tool. They could make it more dynamic by adding dynamic features, which could help us with doing effective analysis."

"I would like a better GUI with navigation. This should make it easier to compare to competitors, like Textronix or Keysight."

"Sometimes, the forms keep changing because of new product technology. If they could reduce the amount of change in the form, this would be good."

"I would like to see them improve the software. The new version can be improved. It's not quite stable. It restarts a lot."

"The user interface is a bit complicated because they have so many tabs. If they could simplify it, this would be helpful and appreciated."

"I would like the frequency range to be extended because of the speed. Electronics are moving forward to higher speeds, so it's better to have higher frequencies."

"The product's antennas and radar applications need improvement."

"Some of the models have only two ports. It takes much longer to use a two-port. If they had a four-port, it would be much better."

"I would like be able to measure multi-lane simultaneously. Right now, the high-performance jitter solution measures one signal. I would like to capture many at the same time."

"While the user interface is good with respect to instrumentation, but with respect to documentation, I do not like it. Its documentation is slightly bad. It was not organized properly. The way it's organized is very difficult to understand, so it takes lot of time to search for one thing in particular."

"Everybody is looking for more automation support, so that if they can incorporate more protocols. It makes it easier."

"There is room for improvement in the upgradeability of the products. When we buy a platform, we would like that platform to survive two or three generations, because it is very expensive. If they could provide a more modular type of design, so if we want to upgrade one functionality then we could upgrade that module, rather than all the equipment, that would be helpful. That modularity is something we would like to see."

"The user interface is not that good. It's not very intuitive. It's functional, but it's not designed for ease of operation. It's designed for functionality."

"I would like more accuracy, particularly for multiport measurements."

"There is a learning curve depends on the client that I am working with. E.g., if I'm working with a client, and they have a test and measurement equipment company, when I go to another company, the new company may not be using the same model."

More Keysight Oscilloscopes cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is costly."

"Pricing is always expensive. It would be better if they lowered the price."

"The first version of the product is always expensive, then once there is competition, it will be cheaper."

"Price-wise, it is much cheaper than its competitors."

"It is expensive, but I guess that is why it works."

"I think everyone gets a demo before purchasing."

"It's very expensive equipment and cannot be upgraded after five years. If you buy equipment today, in five years, it won't be upgradeable. You have to upgrade it within the first five years that you buy it."

"The major factor influencing the decision-makers is the price."

"It's very expensive."

"The pricing is good for what they offer."

"Keysight is on the high side. If they could make the price lower without sacrificing the quality that would be great."

"Pricing can be improved a bit. They try to make the pricing competitive but I think there are times that the competitors have good pricing."

"The cost is always a struggle. We always wish that we could do more for less."

"Our solution is upgradable. However, upgrading depends on how much money the company is willing to spend, because each upgrade will take a million dollars."

"The pricing is on the high side."

More Keysight Oscilloscopes pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Oscilloscopes solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

883,011 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

20%

Legal Firm

15%

Educational Organization

11%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

13%

Retailer

12%

Legal Firm

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	18

Comparisons

Rohde & Schwarz Oscilloscopes vs Anritsu Oscilloscopes

Compared 36% of the time

Tektronix Oscilloscopes vs Anritsu Oscilloscopes

Compared 20% of the time

Yokogawa Oscilloscopes vs Anritsu Oscilloscopes

Compared 19% of the time

More Anritsu Oscilloscopes Competitors

Tektronix Oscilloscopes vs Keysight Oscilloscopes

Compared 33% of the time

Rohde & Schwarz Oscilloscopes vs Keysight Oscilloscopes

Compared 17% of the time

Siglent vs Keysight Oscilloscopes

Compared 13% of the time

RIGOL Oscilloscopes vs Keysight Oscilloscopes

Compared 10% of the time

ScopeMeter vs Keysight Oscilloscopes

Compared 2% of the time

More Keysight Oscilloscopes Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oscilloscopes

January 2026

Download Anritsu Oscilloscopes product report

Buyer's Guide

Keysight Oscilloscopes

February 2026

Download Keysight Oscilloscopes product report

Also Known As

BERTWave Series

InfiniiVision Series, Infiniium Series

Overview

Anritsu sampling oscilloscope is an ideal solution for Eye pattern analyses and Eye Mask tests. In addition, The excellent performance and high sampling speed reduce measurement times and help hold-down equipment costs.

Anritsu

More engineers are switching to Keysight oscilloscopes because they help you:

Get your products to market faster with award-winning oscilloscopes that offer the fastest update rates, the deepest memory, the industry’s only capacitive touch screen, and the most oscilloscope software options.
Produce the highest-performing products with measurements you can trust thanks to oscilloscopes with industry-leading signal integrity and the largest selection of oscilloscope probes.
Achieve the lowest cost of ownership with multiple instruments in one mainframe and easy upgrades.
Get a compact instrument with zero compromise in functionality with the Keysight Streamline Series USB oscilloscopes.

Keysight Technologies

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Nokia Bell Labs

Buyer's Guide

Anritsu Oscilloscopes vs. Keysight Oscilloscopes

February 2026

Free Report: Anritsu Oscilloscopes vs. Keysight Oscilloscopes

Find out what your peers are saying about Anritsu Oscilloscopes vs. Keysight Oscilloscopes and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

883,011 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Anritsu Oscilloscopes vs. Keysight Oscilloscopes report.

See our list of best Oscilloscopes vendors.

We monitor all Oscilloscopes reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.