Anritsu Oscilloscopes vs Keysight Oscilloscopes comparison

Anritsu and Keysight Technologies are both solutions in the Oscilloscopes category. Anritsu is ranked #9, while Keysight Technologies is ranked #4. Anritsu holds a 0.7% mindshare in O, compared to Keysight Technologies’s 11.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Anritsu users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Keysight Technologies users who would recommend it.

Anritsu Oscilloscopes

Read 6 Anritsu Oscilloscopes reviews

239 Views
132 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Keysight Oscilloscopes

Read 23 Keysight Oscilloscopes reviews

3,111 Views
2,611 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Anritsu Oscilloscopes

Keysight Oscilloscopes

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Anritsu Oscilloscopes and Keysight Oscilloscopes based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Oscilloscopes solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Anritsu Oscilloscopes vs. Keysight Oscilloscopes Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Anritsu Oscilloscopes vs. Keysight Oscilloscopes

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,067 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Anritsu Oscilloscopes

Ranking in Oscilloscopes

9th

Average Rating

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Keysight Oscilloscopes

Ranking in Oscilloscopes

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Oscilloscopes category, the mindshare of Anritsu Oscilloscopes is 0.7%, down from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Keysight Oscilloscopes is 11.7%, down from 19.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Oscilloscopes

Featured Reviews

Validati6f62

Validation Engineer at Intel Corporation

The jitter function included in the system has helped me in terms of improving the capabilities of our product, but more improvement can be done on the PAM-4 part

The features are pretty much the same as an expensive competitor, but the price is better. If you have a lot of money to spend, then go for the most advanced solution. However, if you have money constraints, this the best solution for your application. We are using this product to support connected devices. We are measuring signals for PAM-4.

Read full review

Rockwell Hsu

Technical Leader at Cisco Systems, Inc.

We are able to easily record and save our test setup

The most valuable features are its quality and reliability. The type of instrument they make is pretty much the industry standard and trustworthy. They align R&D and design their equipment well, including post-processing stuff. The user interface is getting better due to a lot of feedback from users. With testing getting more complicated these days, you have to go through a lot of different drop-down menus and then go through a lot of steps. It's hard to say there is an easy solution, but of course, from the user's point of view, we would like to have something as simple as possible. The good thing about the GUI interface which is, of course, software-based, is that you can record and save your test setup very easily.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The user interface is easy, simple, and practical."

"The Pulse Pattern Generator (PPG) and Error Detector are co-located, which makes it easier to use because I can just probe it directly on the PCB."

"It supports the PAM-4 encoding scheme. We use that to do our PAM-4 receiver validation."

"It gives you the capability to increase the Tap levels and voltage strength more than what you have in your signal."

"The most valuable feature is its frequency range."

"We can extract signal loss, skew, DKDF... and the tool is very flexible."

"The jitter function included into the system has helped me in terms of improving the capabilities of our product."

"Before silicon came back, our customers' performance was affected. Using these tools, we are able to deliver performance to our customers."

"It's easier to automate and connect with multiple devices, and at the same time with laptops."

"Their software and hardware are integrated, so we don't have to spend a lot of time processing the data."

"The user interface is very user-friendly. You can use a lot of functions in their scope and will provide them for you. You can update the scope's software by asking Keysight to update the software when you want."

"The user interface is simple and straightforward, so I can easily measure frequency, time, and other complex measurements."

"It's accurate, fast, has high bandwidth, and the PLTS is pretty convenient."

"Its 4 port has true differential with quite a few de-embedding features. It goes up to 40 GHz with high performance."

"While it depends on the field, the learning curve is usually really quick."

More Keysight Oscilloscopes pros

Cons

"Right now, it's a minimal tool. They could make it more dynamic by adding dynamic features, which could help us with doing effective analysis."

"I would like the frequency range to be extended because of the speed. Electronics are moving forward to higher speeds, so it's better to have higher frequencies."

"The user interface is a bit complicated because they have so many tabs. If they could simplify it, this would be helpful and appreciated."

"The product's antennas and radar applications need improvement."

"Sometimes, the forms keep changing because of new product technology. If they could reduce the amount of change in the form, this would be good."

"I would like a better GUI with navigation. This should make it easier to compare to competitors, like Textronix or Keysight."

"I would like to see them improve the software. The new version can be improved. It's not quite stable. It restarts a lot."

"I would like more accuracy, particularly for multiport measurements."

"Some of the models have only two ports. It takes much longer to use a two-port. If they had a four-port, it would be much better."

"I would like more customized functions, so we can do the programming and definitions ourselves. There is an automation flow to capture this signal, and we would like to do this ourselves."

"I would like to see the possibility of interacting with the software, new features for software post-processing. For example, once you're done measuring, it would be nice to be able to generate some data starting from the measurement data."

"There is room for improvement in the upgradeability of the products. When we buy a platform, we would like that platform to survive two or three generations, because it is very expensive. If they could provide a more modular type of design, so if we want to upgrade one functionality then we could upgrade that module, rather than all the equipment, that would be helpful. That modularity is something we would like to see."

"There is a learning curve depends on the client that I am working with. E.g., if I'm working with a client, and they have a test and measurement equipment company, when I go to another company, the new company may not be using the same model."

"The technical support is okay, but sometimes they are on a different page than us. If it is something wrong with the scope, they are okay. However, if something technical goes wrong, like the calibration, it is hard to get the information that we need because it is hard to share everything and explain all the measurements in real-time."

"If the simulation runs for a long time, it will suddenly crash. If they can debug that, the product would be better."

More Keysight Oscilloscopes cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The first version of the product is always expensive, then once there is competition, it will be cheaper."

"It's very expensive equipment and cannot be upgraded after five years. If you buy equipment today, in five years, it won't be upgradeable. You have to upgrade it within the first five years that you buy it."

"I think everyone gets a demo before purchasing."

"Price-wise, it is much cheaper than its competitors."

"It is expensive, but I guess that is why it works."

"The pricing is costly."

"Pricing is always expensive. It would be better if they lowered the price."

"The pricing is always high."

"They're not cheap."

"It's expensive, but the quality matters."

"It would be good if it were a little bit cheaper, of course."

"The major factor influencing the decision-makers is the price."

"While I don't have transparency on the pricing, it works within my budget."

"The cost is always a struggle. We always wish that we could do more for less."

"If we rented the product, it would be more affordable than buying new."

More Keysight Oscilloscopes pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Oscilloscopes solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

18%

Legal Firm

13%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

17%

University

11%

Educational Organization

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Comparisons

No data available

Tektronix Oscilloscopes vs Keysight Oscilloscopes

Compared 33% of the time

Siglent vs Keysight Oscilloscopes

Compared 23% of the time

RIGOL Oscilloscopes vs Keysight Oscilloscopes

Compared 14% of the time

Teledyne LeCroy Oscilloscopes vs Keysight Oscilloscopes

Compared 13% of the time

National Instruments (NI) Oscilloscopes vs Keysight Oscilloscopes

Compared 2% of the time

More Keysight Oscilloscopes Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oscilloscopes

November 2024

Download Anritsu Oscilloscopes product report

Buyer's Guide

Keysight Oscilloscopes

December 2024

Download Keysight Oscilloscopes product report

Also Known As

BERTWave Series

InfiniiVision Series, Infiniium Series

Learn More

Anritsu

Keysight Technologies

Overview

Anritsu sampling oscilloscope is an ideal solution for Eye pattern analyses and Eye Mask tests. In addition, The excellent performance and high sampling speed reduce measurement times and help hold-down equipment costs.

More engineers are switching to Keysight oscilloscopes because they help you:

Get your products to market faster with award-winning oscilloscopes that offer the fastest update rates, the deepest memory, the industry’s only capacitive touch screen, and the most oscilloscope software options.
Produce the highest-performing products with measurements you can trust thanks to oscilloscopes with industry-leading signal integrity and the largest selection of oscilloscope probes.
Achieve the lowest cost of ownership with multiple instruments in one mainframe and easy upgrades.
Get a compact instrument with zero compromise in functionality with the Keysight Streamline Series USB oscilloscopes.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Nokia Bell Labs

Buyer's Guide

Anritsu Oscilloscopes vs. Keysight Oscilloscopes

December 2024

Free Report: Anritsu Oscilloscopes vs. Keysight Oscilloscopes

Find out what your peers are saying about Anritsu Oscilloscopes vs. Keysight Oscilloscopes and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Anritsu Oscilloscopes vs. Keysight Oscilloscopes report.

See our list of best Oscilloscopes vendors.

We monitor all Oscilloscopes reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.