Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Apache Airflow vs Genpact Cora SeQuence comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Apache Airflow
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
2nd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
38
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Genpact Cora SeQuence
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
40th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Apache Airflow is 6.8%, down from 9.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Genpact Cora SeQuence is 0.2%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Process Management (BPM)
 

Featured Reviews

Kemal Duman - PeerSpot reviewer
Enables efficient orchestration of batch processes with very good reliability
I am using Apache Airflow to orchestrate my jobs, projects, and batch ETL jobs. It manages tasks, orchestrates jobs, and helps in handling batch processes effectively, incorporating integrations like DBT and Great Expectations Apache Airflow is easy to scale and its UI improves with each release.…
HJ
It is a very stable and scalable product without downtime.
I suggest that before you purchase a solution, you understand their business well, and before selecting a supplier to understand what they are targeting. Too many companies go into this with complex procedures and processes,not understanding it and trying to model it as it goes. So, in the end, they end up with a solution that it is not what they aimed for in the beginning.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I worked on a project at a leading German bank for two years, successfully migrating large applications with hundreds of jobs."
"Apache Airflow is easy to use and can monitor task execution easily. For instance, when performing setup tasks, you can conveniently view the logs without delving into the job details."
"The core features are strong, which are supported by Apache Airflow variables, DAGs, and connections."
"The product integrates well with other pipelines and solutions."
"The best feature is the customization."
"This is a simple tool to automate using Python."
"We have been quite satisfied with the stability of the solution."
"I would rate Apache Airflow from one to ten points overall as ten points, which means it is a very good solution."
"It is very stable. There is no downtime."
"The new reporting and the new dashboard features are really good."
 

Cons

"There is an area for improvement in onboarding new people. They should make it simple for newcomers. Else, we have to put a senior engineer to operate it."
"Technical support is an area that needs improvement."
"One specific feature that is missing from Airflow is that the steps of your workflow are not pipelined, meaning the stageless steps of any workflow. Not every workflow can be implemented within Airflow."
"Apache Airflow could be improved by integrating some versioning principles."
"I have some issues with the solution's communication."
"Adding more automated components in Apache Airflow for basic things like exporting the data would be helpful."
"Airflow should support the dynamic drag creation."
"UI can be improved with additional user-friendly features for non-programmers and for fewer coding practitioner requirements."
"The setup and configuration is complex."
"The design of the interface, in general, could be improved. It could be a bit more user-friendly."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is open source so is free."
"It is an open-source tool. There are no additional fees or charges associated with the product."
"The solution is free if you use Amazon AWS."
"We use a community edition of Apache Airflow. It is open source and free."
"It's open-source."
"It is an open-source solution."
"We are using the open-source version of Apache Airflow."
"The pricing for the product is reasonable."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
847,959 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
26%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Retailer
5%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?
Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very...
What do you like most about Apache Airflow?
Apache Airflow is easy to use and can monitor task execution easily. For instance, when performing setup tasks, you can conveniently view the logs without delving into the job details.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache Airflow?
I prefer using the open-source version rather than the enterprise version, which helps manage costs.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Airflow
Sequence BPM Suite, PNMsoft Sequence BPM Suite
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Agari, WePay, Astronomer
South West Water, Atkins, Wolters Kluwer, Hazera Genetics, GeRAP, Aon Hewitt, Atos Origin, SwiftTrade
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache Airflow vs. Genpact Cora SeQuence and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
847,959 professionals have used our research since 2012.