Apache JMeter vs Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing comparison

Apache and Dotcom-Monitor are both solutions in the Load Testing Tools category. Apache is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.2, while Dotcom-Monitor is ranked #17. Apache holds a 10.9% mindshare in LTT, compared to Dotcom-Monitor’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Apache users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Dotcom-Monitor users who would recommend it.

Apache JMeter

Read 96 Apache JMeter reviews

6,330 Views
3,861 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Str...

Read 3 Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing reviews

282 Views
276 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Apache JMeter

Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Str...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 6, 2025

Apache JMeter and Dotcom-Monitor LoadView are products in the performance testing tools category. Users find Apache JMeter has the upper hand in cost and support, while Dotcom-Monitor LoadView offers more advanced features, providing greater value despite its higher price.

Features: Apache JMeter has open-source technology, robust scripting capabilities, and compatibility with numerous protocols. Dotcom-Monitor LoadView stands out with real-browser testing, global load generation, and intuitive integration with popular platforms.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Deploying Apache JMeter requires technical expertise and manual configurations, with community-driven support. Dotcom-Monitor LoadView provides a streamlined cloud-based setup with professional customer support services, offering a more user-friendly experience.

Pricing and ROI: Apache JMeter's open-source status eliminates licensing fees, reducing initial costs and increasing ROI for businesses with technical skills. Dotcom-Monitor LoadView's paid model entails higher costs but offers substantial ROI with enhanced testing precision and efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed Apache JMeter vs. Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Apache JMeter vs. Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,328 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apache JMeter

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

1st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (1st), API Testing Tools (3rd)

Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Str...

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

17th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Load Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Apache JMeter is 10.9%, down from 22.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing is 1.3%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Load Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Apache JMeter	10.9%
Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing	1.3%
Other	87.8%

Load Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Raja Rao Malkari

Principal Performance Architect at Tecnotree Corporation

Have built custom performance test scripts and integrated them into automated pipelines seamlessly

Apache JMeter has its own pros and cons when compared to other tools. It is easy to use the tool and it has open-source capability so we can build our custom scripts and execute them. It provides other capabilities, such as integrating a database and connecting to other application servers for monitoring and related functions. We use dynamic HTML reporting, which helps us in testing analysis by pinpointing the bottlenecks based on the reports. We can identify the specific areas that need attention, troubleshoot them, and report to the development team. The user-friendly GUI for creating and managing tests makes it very easy to drag and drop samplers. For example, if you want the HTTP sampler, you can drag and drop it and use it. For configurations, we have other samplers. For results, we have the view results samplers that we can also drag and drop. The UI is good in comparison with other tools. Regarding integration with CI/CD pipelines, we can create Apache JMeter scripts and use the Docker image. From the image, whatever scripting we have done can be connected. We can use the CI/CD pipelines and connect them with Jenkins tools and GitHub. Then we can create the pipelines and automate the end-to-end flow. For connecting Jenkins to Apache JMeter, JMeter plugins are available, and we have used them. Apache JMeter also has some third-party plugins, which are not native samplers. If we want to use custom test executions, we definitely use all the different plugins available in Apache JMeter. The capability to simulate users has impacted testing resources and outcomes as Apache JMeter is based on Java, which has a limit to the users in a particular load generator. Apache JMeter provides distributed load testing where you can connect multiple PCs in a master and slave concept, allowing you to pump the load with any number of users. In the past, I have done load testing with 10,000 users by connecting the Apache JMeter distributed network in BlazeMeter. There is a cloud version available, the updated BlazeMeter, and I used that. It is very easy to launch load generators in BlazeMeter, and then we can run the test, scaling up beyond 10,000 users.

Read full review

reviewer1631949

Solutions Architect ICT at a non-tech company with 10,001+ employees

User-friendly, cheap, and quick to set up

It's actually quite easy to set it up. You can change your upgrade plan at any time. The pricing is reasonable. The support was also very good. They are great at helping you set it up. Overall, it's user-friendly. I like that you can also use different servers, which I used in Europe or in different contexts. The reporting is okay. I can get notifications via email, which is nice. Everything is immediate and in real-time.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ease of use is the solution's most valuable feature. Also, the ability to easily create test cases is also very good. It's easy to just ramp up on the solution."

"The scripting ability is most valuable. It is easy to use. There is a UI, and you can go in there and figure those things out. After you've got a good set of tests, you basically have a scripted document that you can grab and execute in a pipeline. It is pretty quick to set up, and you can scale it and version control it."

"JMeter lets us generate virtual users and T-load, per our requirements. It's easy to configure and adjusting the virtual users according to the DPS we want to achieve."

"The most valuable feature in JMeter is the Thread Group, which helps us to see whether the performance is good."

"It is scalable. You can scale up to 1,000 users in JMeter. If you can put up four slave servers, you can easily ramp up to 1,000 users."

"The solution is scalable."

"The solution helps by detecting bottlenecks."

"Very user-friendly and easy to use."

More Apache JMeter pros

"The pricing is reasonable."

Cons

"The memory utilization in JMeter is very poor."

"The GUI of Apache JMeter is not that user-friendly because we have many proxies, and we have to record through the proxy."

"JMeter output reports can be difficult to understand without training."

"What needs improvement in Apache JMeter is the very high load requirements when you want to scale it beyond certain thresholds. For example, small to mid-range testing is very easily done with Apache JMeter, but if you scale and increase the load, then it would be a problem because the tool consumes a lot of resources, probably because Apache JMeter provides an enriched UI experience, so it consumes a lot of memory and requires high CPU usage. This means you have to manage your infrastructure, or else you'll have high overhead expenses. As Apache JMeter is a heavyweight tool, that is an area for improvement, though I'm unsure if Apache can do something about it because it could be a result of the way it's architected. What I'd like to see from Apache JMeter in the future is for it to transition to the cloud, as a lot of cloud technologies emerge around the globe, and a lot of people prefer cloud-based solutions or cloud-native tools. Even if a company has a legacy system, it's still possible to transition to the cloud. I've worked with a company that was an on-premise company that moved to the cloud and became cloud-native. If Apache JMeter could transition to the cloud, similar to k6, then it could help lessen the intense resource consumption that's currently happening in Apache JMeter."

"It has some proxy-based dependencies which require specific proxies to be set up or disabled, which causes problems."

"Apache JMeter could use improvement in reporting. Currently, it isn't easy to generate reports in PDF format. While receiving reports in PDF format is possible, it requires a lot of customization. Additionally, when comparing the load test to others solutions it could improve."

"Some features still require a certain knowledge level to use effectively, and making these features more user-friendly would be beneficial."

"JMeter should be more stable. Every time there is a new release coming up, a lot of its older functionalities or the new functionalities that are brought in are not very well-documented. It should be documented properly, and there should be proper use cases."

More Apache JMeter cons

"A lot of time you start the stress testing, and you sign the log in again, and I want to get rid of that. It's just not clear to me how to do it yet."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In terms of open-source adoption, it is completely free."

"Since it's free, there's no need for extensive support or improvements in pricing."

"We didn't pay licensing fees for Apache JMeter because it's an open-source tool. We only paid for the machines where we installed Apache JMeter modules."

"The product has reasonable pricing."

"This is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing costs associated with it."

"Apache JMeter is a free tool."

"It is open source. There are no licensing costs associated. If you need enterprise support, you'll probably end up paying for a license. You would also factor in the infrastructure cost, but that's not significant."

"This is an open-source solution, and there are no fees."

More Apache JMeter pricing and cost advice

"You can buy plans that range from free to $500 a month."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Load Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,328 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	27
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	56

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Postman compare with Apache JMeter?

Postman lets you easily define variables, which then get updated automatically. This is a huge time-saver and makes processes very efficient. We can also export the test cases we create and share t...

See all answers

How does BlazeMeter compare with Apache JMeter?

Blazemeter is a continuous testing platform that provides scriptless test automation. It unifies functional and performance testing, enabling users to monitor and test public and private APIs. We ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Apache JMeter?

I appreciate JMeter's simplicity and power for performance testing.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tricentis NeoLoad vs Apache JMeter

Compared 15% of the time

BlazeMeter vs Apache JMeter

Compared 9% of the time

Postman Enterprise vs Apache JMeter

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Apache JMeter

Compared 5% of the time

ReadyAPI vs Apache JMeter

Compared 5% of the time

More Apache JMeter Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apache JMeter

March 2026

Download Apache JMeter product report

Buyer's Guide

Load Testing Tools

March 2026

Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing report

Download Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing product report

Also Known As

JMeter

LoadView Stress Testing

Overview

Apache JMeter is an open-source Java application that tests load and functional behavior and performance in applications. Created initially to test web applications, it has expanded its functionality to test other functions. For instance, you can test a server to see how efficiently it works and how many user requests can be handled simultaneously.

You can use JMeter to test functional performance and regression tests on different technologies. This Java desktop application has an easy-to-use graphical interface which uses the Swing graphical API. You can run JMeter on any environment that accepts a Java virtual machine, such as Windows, Linux, and Mac.

What protocols does JMeter support?

Web - HTTP, HTTPS
Web services - SOAP/XML-RPC
Email service - POP3, IMAP, SMTP
FTP service
Database via JDBC drivers
LDAP
Native commands or shell scripts
TCP
Java objects

How does JMeter work?

JMeter sends requests to a target server by simulating a group of user requests. Then it collects and calculates statistics on the performance of the target. This target can be a server or an application.

You can test the performance of static resources, such as JavaScript or HTML, and dynamic resources, such as JSP, Servlets, and AJAX. It is also helpful to determine how many concurrent users your website can handle.

There are two main tests you can carry out with JMeter: load test and stress test. The load test models expected usage of a server by simulating multiple users accessing the web server simultaneously. The stress testing aims to find the maximum load capacity of the server or application.

Apache JMeter Key Features

JMeter enables fast test plan recording, building, and debugging via a featured test IDE (integrated development environment).
Command-line mode allows carrying out load tests from any OS compatible with Java.
JMeter can extract data from most popular response formats, such as HTML, JSON, XML.
JMeter is entirely portable.
A multithreading framework allows you to simultaneously test multiple samplings and separate thread groups.
Thanks to the caching feature, you can conduct offline analysis or replay test results.

Apache JMeter Benefits

As open-source software, it is freely available and continuously improved.
The setup is user-friendly, and no installation is needed.
The GUI (graphic user interface) is intuitive and easy to use.
You can write your own tests and use the visualization plugins to extend the testing.
It is a platform-agnostic tool. For example, JMeter can work with Linux by clicking on the JMeter shell script. On Windows, you can call up JMeter by starting the jmeter.bat file.
Since the test plans are stored in XML format, you can generate a test plan using any text editor.
You can simulate a heavy load on a server, a group of servers, a network, or an object. Use JMeter to test an application or server's strength and performance under different load types.

The JMeter extensible core has numerous benefits:

Unlimited testing capabilities via pluggable samplers.
You can choose multiple load statistics with pluggable timers.
Visualization plugins and data analysis enable customization.
Continuous integration via third-party open-source libraries (Maven, Gradle, and Jenkins).

Reviews from Real Users

Stephen B., I.T. Architect, Analyst, and Developer at an educational organization, says, "The scripting ability is most valuable. It is easy to use. There is a UI, and you can go in there and figure those things out. After you've got a good set of tests, you basically have a scripted document that you can grab and execute in a pipeline. It is pretty quick to set up, and you can scale it and version control it."

"I like the fact that JMeter integrates well with other tools," adds the Founder and Principal Consultant at a tech services company.

A Quality Engineering Delivery Leader at a financial services firm says, “The performance of the solution is excellent. They have designed the product so that it is very easy to configure. You can basically do anything you like with the product. It's not very restrictive. We like the fact that the technology is open-source.”

Apache

LoadView provides scalable external load testing using real browsers. Spin up virtual machines in the Amazon, Google or Rackspace clouds without having to manage cloud accounts. Record scripts and run stress tests on demand. Learn more at https://www.loadview-testing.com

Dotcom-Monitor

Sample Customers

AOL, Orbitz, Innopath Software, PrepMe, Sapient, Corporate Express Australia, CSIRO, Ephibian, Talis, DATACOM, ALALOOP, eFusion, Panter, Sourcepole, University of Western Cape

Citrix, Aflac, Xerox, American InterContinental University, UMASS, ITT Technical Institute, Roanoke College

Buyer's Guide

Apache JMeter vs. Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing

March 2026

Free Report: Apache JMeter vs. Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache JMeter vs. Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,328 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apache JMeter vs. Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing report.

See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.