Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Apache JMeter vs Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing comparison

Apache and Dotcom-Monitor are both solutions in the Load Testing Tools category. Apache is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.2, while Dotcom-Monitor is ranked #17. Apache holds a 11.4% mindshare in LTT, compared to Dotcom-Monitor’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Apache users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Dotcom-Monitor users who would recommend it.
Apache JMeter
Read 96 Apache JMeter reviews
  • 6,120 Views
  • 3,733 Comparison Views
88% willing to recommend
Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Str...
Read 3 Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing reviews
  • 261 Views
  • 253 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 6, 2025

Apache JMeter and Dotcom-Monitor LoadView are products in the performance testing tools category. Users find Apache JMeter has the upper hand in cost and support, while Dotcom-Monitor LoadView offers more advanced features, providing greater value despite its higher price.

Features: Apache JMeter has open-source technology, robust scripting capabilities, and compatibility with numerous protocols. Dotcom-Monitor LoadView stands out with real-browser testing, global load generation, and intuitive integration with popular platforms.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Deploying Apache JMeter requires technical expertise and manual configurations, with community-driven support. Dotcom-Monitor LoadView provides a streamlined cloud-based setup with professional customer support services, offering a more user-friendly experience.

Pricing and ROI: Apache JMeter's open-source status eliminates licensing fees, reducing initial costs and increasing ROI for businesses with technical skills. Dotcom-Monitor LoadView's paid model entails higher costs but offers substantial ROI with enhanced testing precision and efficiency.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Apache JMeter vs. Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing Report (Updated: December 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Apache JMeter vs. Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing
December 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 881,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Apache JMeter
Ranking in Load Testing Tools
1st
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
96
Ranking in other categories
Performance Testing Tools (1st), API Testing Tools (3rd)
Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Str...
Ranking in Load Testing Tools
17th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Load Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Apache JMeter is 11.4%, down from 23.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing is 1.3%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Load Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Apache JMeter11.4%
Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing1.3%
Other87.3%
Load Testing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

RR
Raja Rao Malkari
Principal Performance Architect at Tecnotree Corporation
Have built custom performance test scripts and integrated them into automated pipelines seamlessly
Apache JMeter has its own pros and cons when compared to other tools. It is easy to use the tool and it has open-source capability so we can build our custom scripts and execute them. It provides other capabilities, such as integrating a database and connecting to other application servers for monitoring and related functions. We use dynamic HTML reporting, which helps us in testing analysis by pinpointing the bottlenecks based on the reports. We can identify the specific areas that need attention, troubleshoot them, and report to the development team. The user-friendly GUI for creating and managing tests makes it very easy to drag and drop samplers. For example, if you want the HTTP sampler, you can drag and drop it and use it. For configurations, we have other samplers. For results, we have the view results samplers that we can also drag and drop. The UI is good in comparison with other tools. Regarding integration with CI/CD pipelines, we can create Apache JMeter scripts and use the Docker image. From the image, whatever scripting we have done can be connected. We can use the CI/CD pipelines and connect them with Jenkins tools and GitHub. Then we can create the pipelines and automate the end-to-end flow. For connecting Jenkins to Apache JMeter, JMeter plugins are available, and we have used them. Apache JMeter also has some third-party plugins, which are not native samplers. If we want to use custom test executions, we definitely use all the different plugins available in Apache JMeter. The capability to simulate users has impacted testing resources and outcomes as Apache JMeter is based on Java, which has a limit to the users in a particular load generator. Apache JMeter provides distributed load testing where you can connect multiple PCs in a master and slave concept, allowing you to pump the load with any number of users. In the past, I have done load testing with 10,000 users by connecting the Apache JMeter distributed network in BlazeMeter. There is a cloud version available, the updated BlazeMeter, and I used that. It is very easy to launch load generators in BlazeMeter, and then we can run the test, scaling up beyond 10,000 users.
Read full review
reviewer1631949 - PeerSpot reviewer
reviewer1631949
Solutions Architect ICT at a non-tech company with 10,001+ employees
User-friendly, cheap, and quick to set up
It's actually quite easy to set it up. You can change your upgrade plan at any time. The pricing is reasonable. The support was also very good. They are great at helping you set it up. Overall, it's user-friendly. I like that you can also use different servers, which I used in Europe or in different contexts. The reporting is okay. I can get notifications via email, which is nice. Everything is immediate and in real-time.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The thread groups, samplers, and listeners, which are all determined by the script's requirements, are the most valuable features of this solution."
"The reporting features are really good. There's a lot less latency than other solutions."
"JMeter's open-source nature allows us to create scripts easily, add any number of users during load tests, and handle large volumes of data without additional cost."
"What I like best about Apache JMeter is its user-friendly GUI because even if you don't have very good coding knowledge or understanding, or even if you don't come from a development background, you can still use the solution with just a few clicks. This is what's unique about Apache JMeter, in comparison with other tools in the market. As Apache JMeter is open source, when there's a missing feature, you can search in several community blogs for plugins that you can use to modify Apache JMeter to meet your requirements, and this is another advantage."
"It is very quick and user-friendly."
"JMeter is easy to use for a user who doesn't have too much knowledge of programming or certain languages."
"We had some challenges testing HTTP/2 APIs, which are becoming more prevalent with advancements like 5G. So, we added another plugin to help with HTTP/2 API load testing. Apache JMeter, with additional plugins, now supports HTTP/2, which is critical as everyone moves from HTTP/1 to HTTP/2."
"Apache JMeter helps my testing analysis by providing precise reports; the HTML format report gives me the exact transactions, response times, and graphs that show average response times, as well as throughput per second."
More Apache JMeter pros
"The pricing is reasonable."
 

Cons

"To the best of my knowledge, the documentation could be improved. It should be enhanced to better support newcomers. Currently, only people with some experience can easily understand the content. Including more sample programs, applications, and use cases would help many more people adapt to using the solution."
"JMeter should be more stable. Every time there is a new release coming up, a lot of its older functionalities or the new functionalities that are brought in are not very well-documented. It should be documented properly, and there should be proper use cases."
"The tool needs improvements related to client-side metrics, integrating with tools like YSlow or HTTP Watch, and enhancing mobile testing capabilities."
"The UI of the solution needs to be better. The UI takes up a lot of our bandwidth."
"In this tool, automation in general is almost non-existent. Everything is done manually."
"They should improve the solution on its UI front."
"They can improve it a little bit in terms of distribution load testing. We struggled with it during the distribution. In terms of reporting, runtime monitoring is not currently included, and it should be included. They can also improve it on the reporting side in terms of the comparison of the reports. They can also focus more on integration with CI/CD. Currently, people are using their own customized tools. It would be nice if Apache can provide some standard tools and procedures for integration with CI/CD tools like DPR. There are some tools, but it would be nice if official standard tools and procedures are available."
"Both scalability and stability could be improved in Apache JMeter."
More Apache JMeter cons
"A lot of time you start the stress testing, and you sign the log in again, and I want to get rid of that. It's just not clear to me how to do it yet."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Apache JMeter is a free tool."
"It is free."
"Since we are using an outsourced solution, it is not paid for by our company."
"The tool is open-source."
"Apache JMeter is a free open source solution and it is why we are using it."
"The solution is open source with no user fees or licenses."
"The solution is open-source."
"The solution is free of cost as it is open source."
More Apache JMeter pricing and cost advice
"You can buy plans that range from free to $500 a month."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Load Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
881,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Retailer
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business27
Midsize Enterprise24
Large Enterprise56
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

How does Postman compare with Apache JMeter?
Postman lets you easily define variables, which then get updated automatically. This is a huge time-saver and makes processes very efficient. We can also export the test cases we create and share t...
See all answers
How does BlazeMeter compare with Apache JMeter?
Blazemeter is a continuous testing platform that provides scriptless test automation. It unifies functional and performance testing, enabling users to monitor and test public and private APIs. We ...
See all answers
What do you like most about Apache JMeter?
I appreciate JMeter's simplicity and power for performance testing.
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Tricentis NeoLoad vs Apache JMeter Logo
Tricentis NeoLoad vs Apache JMeter
Compared 13% of the time
BlazeMeter vs Apache JMeter Logo
BlazeMeter vs Apache JMeter
Compared 11% of the time
Postman Enterprise vs Apache JMeter Logo
Postman Enterprise vs Apache JMeter
Compared 6% of the time
ReadyAPI vs Apache JMeter Logo
ReadyAPI vs Apache JMeter
Compared 5% of the time
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Apache JMeter Logo
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Apache JMeter
Compared 5% of the time
More Apache JMeter Competitors
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Apache JMeter
January 2026
Apache JMeter reportDownload Apache JMeter product report
Buyer's Guide
Load Testing Tools
January 2026
Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing reportDownload Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing product report
 

Also Known As

JMeter
LoadView Stress Testing
 

Overview

Apache JMeter is an open-source Java application that tests load and functional behavior and performance in applications. Created initially to test web applications, it has expanded its functionality to test other functions. For instance, you can test a server to see how efficiently it works and how many user requests can be handled simultaneously.

You can use JMeter to test functional performance and regression tests on different technologies. This Java desktop application has an easy-to-use graphical interface which uses the Swing graphical API. You can run JMeter on any environment that accepts a Java virtual machine, such as Windows, Linux, and Mac.

What protocols does JMeter support?

  • Web - HTTP, HTTPS
  • Web services - SOAP/XML-RPC
  • Email service - POP3, IMAP, SMTP
  • FTP service
  • Database via JDBC drivers
  • LDAP
  • Native commands or shell scripts
  • TCP
  • Java objects

How does JMeter work?

JMeter sends requests to a target server by simulating a group of user requests. Then it collects and calculates statistics on the performance of the target. This target can be a server or an application.

You can test the performance of static resources, such as JavaScript or HTML, and dynamic resources, such as JSP, Servlets, and AJAX. It is also helpful to determine how many concurrent users your website can handle.

There are two main tests you can carry out with JMeter: load test and stress test. The load test models expected usage of a server by simulating multiple users accessing the web server simultaneously. The stress testing aims to find the maximum load capacity of the server or application.

Apache JMeter Key Features

  • JMeter enables fast test plan recording, building, and debugging via a featured test IDE (integrated development environment).
  • Command-line mode allows carrying out load tests from any OS compatible with Java.
  • JMeter can extract data from most popular response formats, such as HTML, JSON, XML.
  • JMeter is entirely portable.
  • A multithreading framework allows you to simultaneously test multiple samplings and separate thread groups.
  • Thanks to the caching feature, you can conduct offline analysis or replay test results.

Apache JMeter Benefits

  • As open-source software, it is freely available and continuously improved.
  • The setup is user-friendly, and no installation is needed.
  • The GUI (graphic user interface) is intuitive and easy to use.
  • You can write your own tests and use the visualization plugins to extend the testing.
  • It is a platform-agnostic tool. For example, JMeter can work with Linux by clicking on the JMeter shell script. On Windows, you can call up JMeter by starting the jmeter.bat file.
  • Since the test plans are stored in XML format, you can generate a test plan using any text editor.
  • You can simulate a heavy load on a server, a group of servers, a network, or an object. Use JMeter to test an application or server's strength and performance under different load types.

The JMeter extensible core has numerous benefits:

  • Unlimited testing capabilities via pluggable samplers.
  • You can choose multiple load statistics with pluggable timers.
  • Visualization plugins and data analysis enable customization.
  • Continuous integration via third-party open-source libraries (Maven, Gradle, and Jenkins).

Reviews from Real Users

Stephen B., I.T. Architect, Analyst, and Developer at an educational organization, says, "The scripting ability is most valuable. It is easy to use. There is a UI, and you can go in there and figure those things out. After you've got a good set of tests, you basically have a scripted document that you can grab and execute in a pipeline. It is pretty quick to set up, and you can scale it and version control it."

"I like the fact that JMeter integrates well with other tools," adds the Founder and Principal Consultant at a tech services company.

A Quality Engineering Delivery Leader at a financial services firm says, “The performance of the solution is excellent. They have designed the product so that it is very easy to configure. You can basically do anything you like with the product. It's not very restrictive. We like the fact that the technology is open-source.”

Apache
LoadView provides scalable external load testing using real browsers. Spin up virtual machines in the Amazon, Google or Rackspace clouds without having to manage cloud accounts. Record scripts and run stress tests on demand. Learn more at https://www.loadview-testing.com
Dotcom-Monitor
 

Sample Customers

AOL, Orbitz, Innopath Software, PrepMe, Sapient, Corporate Express Australia, CSIRO, Ephibian, Talis, DATACOM, ALALOOP, eFusion, Panter, Sourcepole, University of Western Cape
Citrix, Aflac, Xerox, American InterContinental University, UMASS, ITT Technical Institute, Roanoke College
Buyer's Guide
Apache JMeter vs. Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing
December 2025
Free Report: Apache JMeter vs. Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache JMeter vs. Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
881,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Apache JMeter vs. Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing report.
See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.