Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ARCON Privileged Access Management vs Netwrix Privileged Access Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

ARCON Privileged Access Man...
Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)
8th
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
33
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Netwrix Privileged Access M...
Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)
34th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2024, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of ARCON Privileged Access Management is 4.5%, down from 4.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Netwrix Privileged Access Management is 0.7%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
 

Featured Reviews

ArjitYadav - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 11, 2024
Provides valuable features like vaulting and command blacklisting but stability issues with disconnections and high availability
ARCON can be used to protect privileged entities by granting access via remote RDP, SSH, or recorded systems. Any activity on the server, endpoint, or network device is recorded for compliance.  Traffic is routed through a gateway, which enhances security by not requiring many open ports. This…
Use Netwrix Privileged Access Management?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing and licensing model is very economical."
"There are no major concerns with licensing because we can handle multiple servers in our kiosk system."
"Their licensing model is very simple, as it is based on the number of endpoints which you want to manage along with the number of users and administrators which you want to use."
"The product's pricing is a good value. It's appropriately priced. The product has all the required features. It doesn't work in some of the areas but, right now overall, it's pretty good."
"The product is available with competitive pricing. Licensing is not complex. We calculated the license requirements by counting the number of admins and the number of devices which were going to integrate with it."
"The cost of this product is very cheap, comparatively in the global market."
"We have a subscription to use this solution."
"Product pricing is based on users and connections. We did not have to pay more for additional features."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.
801,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
62%
Computer Software Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
4%
Retailer
3%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with ARCON Privileged Access Management?
The solution could be more stable as we've encountered bugs and issues. I'd also suggest adding a browser isolation feature to prevent cache storage on endpoints and mitigate cache-based attacks. T...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

ARCON ARCOS, ARCON PAM
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

RAK Bank, AXIS Bank, Reliance Capital, Kotak Life Insurance, MTS
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, One Identity and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Updated: September 2024.
801,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.