Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ArcSight Analytics vs Securonix UEBA comparison

OpenText and Securonix Solutions are both solutions in the User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) category. OpenText is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.0, while Securonix Solutions is ranked #15. OpenText holds a 1.5% mindshare in UBA, compared to Securonix Solutions’s 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Securonix Solutions users who would recommend it.
ArcSight Analytics
Read 15 ArcSight Analytics reviews
  • 266 Views
  • 123 Comparison Views
66% willing to recommend
Securonix UEBA
Read 3 Securonix UEBA reviews
  • 566 Views
  • 370 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between ArcSight Analytics and Securonix UEBA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed ArcSight Analytics vs. Securonix UEBA Report (Updated: October 2024).
Buyer's Guide
ArcSight Analytics vs. Securonix UEBA
October 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 814,649 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

ArcSight Analytics
Ranking in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
14th
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Securonix UEBA
Ranking in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
15th
Average Rating
10.0
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) category, the mindshare of ArcSight Analytics is 1.5%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Securonix UEBA is 2.8%, down from 5.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
 

Featured Reviews

Syed Ubaid Ali Jafri - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 28, 2018
It has improved our system and network policy monitoring
I have used ArcSight Analytics to assess environments with more than a 100 network devices and 12 different firewalls.  I have used it to evaluate 120 servers, which include Sybase, AIX, SAP, Windows, other Linux-based servers.  It has been used with Db2 and Oracle databases ArcSight Analytics…
Read full review
YL
Sep 12, 2019
Algorithms surface the exact indicators we need for insider threat detection
The aggregation library is definitely very comprehensive. It covers a lot of use cases. Also, the feature dashboard is very well organized and intuitive to use. It organizes information on a timeline which is exactly what we need for insider threat future-analysis. Data insights are where we can not only look at items but can visualize the activity trends over a period of time and compare them across organizations. That's very useful for us. The algorithms surface the exact indicators that we need for the purpose of insider threat detection. That is something that we have not always found is the case with other vendors we have evaluated. We consider cyber indicators as part of insider threat detection. We don't look at them in silos. We correlate them and look at them from a holistic point of view. The algorithm for surfacing those relevant indicators is very comprehensive. We almost find everything we need to surface the indicators we want. We're very impressed with that.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Less resource consumption in terms of memory and processing."
"The data collection and the integration with different products are valuable features."
"The solution is easy to implement."
"One of the most valuable features is the alerts."
"The ability to correlate different logs is the solution's most valuable feature."
"The most valuable features are that you get lots of connectors, which make it easy to log in to my ASM, and lots of prebuilt roles from the company."
"ArcSight Analytics is used to get a deeper insight and threat analysis about the network."
"This solution allows us to identify connections for all users."
More ArcSight Analytics pros
"Their user and entity behavior analysis algorithms are the most valuable features."
"One of the most valuable features is UEBA. It's pretty helpful for us to make sure of our thresholds for any of our clients."
"The feature dashboard is very well organized and intuitive to use. It organizes information on a timeline which is exactly what we need for insider threat future-analysis."
 

Cons

"The reporting and the way it is worded needs to be improved in future releases. The dashboards are quite poorly designed."
"There is a GUI, but it is not complete and lacks functionality that needs to be performed using the console."
"The GUI interface is not always intuitive and easy for non-technical users to work with."
"I would like to see orchestration."
"Network integration is very crucial, and you need to have the knowledge to get it done."
"Currently, there are no compatible connectors for this solution, which means we have to depend on FlexConnectors."
"I would like to see integration with automation products, such as Phantom Automation."
"It's a difficult product to navigate, it's complex."
More ArcSight Analytics cons
"The area that needs improvement is reporting."
"When compared to others, if you look at the integration aspect, I believe that some aspects of integration can be enhanced."
"There is room for improvement in the algorithms. Although I said that we have a very solid starting point - our existing library is already very comprehensive - we constantly find areas where we need to develop new algorithms. That is common across platforms. Any vendor with a solid starting point would still need to continue to evolve."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In addition to the costs of standard licensing fees, there is the cost of labor for maintenance."
"This solution is expensive."
"The monthly licensing fee is around $20,000. There aren't any costs in addition to the standard licensing fee."
"My customers pay a yearly licensing fee for ArcSight Analytics."
"ArcSight Analytics is a bit expensive compared with other tools in terms of licensing costs, training, hardware implementation, and support."
"It can range between $30,000 and $40,000 USD, and can go up to $500,000 and $600,000 USD."
"Their pricing is pretty comfortable. They will work with you on the cost."
"When compared to other solutions, it is less expensive."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Insurance Company
11%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What SOC product do you recommend?
For tools I’d recommend: -SIEM- LogRhythm -SOAR- Palo Alto XSOAR Doing commercial w/o both (or at least an XDR) is asking to miss details that are critical, and ending up a statistic. Also, rememb...
See all answers
What do you like most about ArcSight Analytics?
ArcSight Analytics is used to get a deeper insight and threat analysis about the network.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ArcSight Analytics?
My customers pay a yearly licensing fee for ArcSight Analytics.
See all answers
What are the biggest differences between Securonix UEBA, Exabeam, and IBM QRadar?
It mostly depends on your use-cases and environment. Exabeam and Securonix have a stronger UEBA feature set, friendlier GUI and are not licensed based on capacity (amount of logs and information in...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
IBM Security QRadar vs Securonix UEBA Logo
IBM Security QRadar vs Securonix UEBA
Compared 56% of the time
Splunk User Behavior Analytics vs Securonix UEBA Logo
Splunk User Behavior Analytics vs Securonix UEBA
Compared 44% of the time
More Securonix UEBA Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
ArcSight Analytics
November 2024
ArcSight Analytics reportDownload ArcSight Analytics product report
Buyer's Guide
Securonix UEBA
October 2024
Securonix UEBA reportDownload Securonix UEBA product report
 

Also Known As

ArcSight User Behavior Analytics, ArcSight UBA
Securonix User and Entity Behavior Analytics
 

Learn More

OpenText
Video not available
Securonix Solutions
 

Overview

ArcSight User Behavior Analytics offers enterprises the ability to monitor and detect from internal and external security threats and fraud.

Securonix User and Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) leverages sophisticated machine learning and behavior analytics to analyze and correlate interactions between users, systems, applications, IP addresses, and data. Light, nimble, and quick to deploy, Securonix UEBA detects advanced insider threats, cyber threats, fraud, cloud data compromise, and non-compliance. Built-in automated response playbooks and customizable case management work flows allow your security team to respond to threats quickly, accurately, and efficiently

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Pfizer, McKesson, BNY Mellon, New York Life
Buyer's Guide
ArcSight Analytics vs. Securonix UEBA
October 2024
Free Report: ArcSight Analytics vs. Securonix UEBA
Find out what your peers are saying about ArcSight Analytics vs. Securonix UEBA and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our ArcSight Analytics vs. Securonix UEBA report.
See our list of best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.

We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.