We performed a comparison between ARIS BPA and BIC Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Design solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The simulation engine and SAP integration are technically very robust."
"It has the ability to scale up, as well as integrate with other systems within the organization to get real-time information from dashboards and reports."
"I am an advanced user. ARIS BPM is intuitive for me because I know the UML, BPMN, and EPC methodologies implemented in this tool. It is very easy to create processes for restructuring a company with some descriptions."
"The most valuable features of ARIS BPA are its flexibility and reporting."
"The capability to integrate all information of the business and to generate simulations of processes. It can analyze the model of operations quickly."
"ARIS process modeling and analysis allows integration of end-to-end business processes with the organization's vision, strategies, and business objectives, through visual management."
"In general, the users really like it and they can get started using it very easily."
"The initial setup and installation are very straightforward."
"The product is easy to use."
"While this is a new product it has a mature feel from being built by a company with many years in the business."
"This is low-cost and very user friendly. A variety of models are available depending on the needs of the customer."
"The central dictionary is a valuable feature."
"Integration with third-party tools should be improved (e.g. based on APIs)."
"Newer versions (9.x) are technically more difficult to maintain."
"The Risk and Compliance Management tool is rather complex and moreover, it needs to be customized if you want to use it."
"The solution is difficult and not very exciting to learn."
"One of the issues is, when you are defining databases, the way they use entities and relationship diagrams, the way we can define data, like data models, there is still a part they could improve."
"An area where it lacks and can be considered for improvement in the future is if we can somehow automate or learn how we can automate different processes."
"There are reports available in ARIS and you can modify them a bit if you want something more specific, but it's not that easy to adjust them and make modifications. It would be nice to have some kind of tool to do that, something that is more user-friendly for people who are not too technical, so that they could create reports the way they want them."
"The user experience's usability (in general) should be improved as the tool is updated."
"The solution could improve its connectivity to other systems."
"As the product is very new, some minor features are still missing, but everything is there to handle day-to-day process modeling."
"The product needs improvement regarding the confidentiality of the domain information for the key administrator."
"There's an issue with the current manual that they're working on."
ARIS BPA is ranked 3rd in Business Process Design with 64 reviews while BIC Platform is ranked 18th in Business Process Design with 4 reviews. ARIS BPA is rated 8.4, while BIC Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of ARIS BPA writes "I can usually find an answer to my issue on ARIS Community". On the other hand, the top reviewer of BIC Platform writes "Provides good stability, but they should add a feature for enterprise architecture". ARIS BPA is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Manager, ADONIS, Camunda, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and Appian, whereas BIC Platform is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Manager, Visio, ADONIS, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and Camunda. See our ARIS BPA vs. BIC Platform report.
See our list of best Business Process Design vendors and best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.