Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Automai AppVerify vs Panaya Test Dynamix comparison

Automai Corporation and Panaya are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. Automai Corporation is ranked #40, while Panaya is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.0. Automai Corporation holds a 0.2% mindshare in FT, compared to Panaya’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Panaya users are willing to recommend the solution.
Automai AppVerify
  • 115 Views
  • 84 Comparison Views
Panaya Test Dynamix
Read 4 Panaya Test Dynamix reviews
  • 862 Views
  • 445 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Automai AppVerify and Panaya Test Dynamix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, BrowserStack and others in Functional Testing Tools.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: November 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
November 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 816,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
6.1
Panaya Test Dynamix is praised for scalability, efficient test case management, integration, reliability, and performance under large workloads.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
5.8
Panaya Test Dynamix requires better customization, clearer error messages, improved performance, enhanced integration, easier navigation, and more comprehensive training resources.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.0
Users praise Panaya Test Dynamix for its automation, detailed reporting, ease of use, seamless integration, and efficient defect management.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.5
Panaya Test Dynamix stands out for its stability, reliability, and efficient performance, excelling under heavy workflows and various conditions.
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Users praise Panaya Test Dynamix customer service for prompt, knowledgeable, and efficient support with effective communication and problem-solving skills.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Panaya Test Dynamix offers competitive, scalable, and cost-effective pricing with customizable packages to meet diverse organizational testing needs.
 

Categories and Ranking

Automai AppVerify
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
40th
Ranking in Regression Testing Tools
25th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Panaya Test Dynamix
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
22nd
Ranking in Regression Testing Tools
10th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Defect Tracking (2nd), Test Management Tools (12th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Automai AppVerify is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Panaya Test Dynamix is 1.1%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Functional Testing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Use Automai AppVerify?
Share your opinion
Alain Vanhaeght - PeerSpot reviewer
More than reliable, with satisfied results for our needs, and excellent testing options
For the moment we are looking to automated testing, and there today apparently it is not working well with the application we want to test. So we are using an application on a terminal server and some quirks make it challenging to make automatic testing. It would be nice to be able to test offline. What I mean by that is today most of the time things are in the cloud, but sometimes when we are in factories we do not have network access and we should be able to download a test script into our PCs and do the test offline. Once that is complete we can re-upload it when we again have a network connection.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
20%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Retailer
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Panaya Test Dynamix?
The most valuable feature is the ability to copy the scenarios and as we do a rollout we can efficiently complete test three and put it somewhere else under a new subsidiary.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Panaya Test Dynamix?
For the moment we are looking to automated testing, and there today apparently it is not working well with the application we want to test. So we are using an application on a terminal server and s...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Panaya Test Dynamix?
Our primary use case is for our process and we have different phases where we do testing and we have what we called IT and BPA testing. So it is a combined group of IT people and business people do...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
Tricentis Tosca vs Panaya Test Dynamix Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs Panaya Test Dynamix
Compared 67% of the time
Tricentis qTest vs Panaya Test Dynamix Logo
Tricentis qTest vs Panaya Test Dynamix
Compared 15% of the time
Worksoft Certify vs Panaya Test Dynamix Logo
Worksoft Certify vs Panaya Test Dynamix
Compared 11% of the time
OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs Panaya Test Dynamix Logo
OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs Panaya Test Dynamix
Compared 7% of the time
More Panaya Test Dynamix Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Regression Testing Tools
November 2024
Automai AppVerify reportDownload Automai AppVerify product report
Buyer's Guide
Test Management Tools
November 2024
Panaya Test Dynamix reportDownload Panaya Test Dynamix product report
 

Also Known As

AppVerify, NRG Global AppVerify
No data available
 

Learn More

Automai Corporation
Panaya
 

Overview

Continuous Regression Testing for Agile, DevOps, and Continuous Delivery teams. A solution to test any of your applications from the user standpoint. Scripts are created without writing a line of code. Streamline your testing processes and be assured all changes are verified. Get a free POC here: https://www.nrgglobal.com/application-performance-monitoring-appswatch/

Panaya Test Dynamix makes it easy for large enterprises to test smarter and release faster, by gaining control and visibility of every aspect of their ERP testing wherever they are.

With SAP ERP testing holding unique challenges, Test Dynamix offers provides all test management and execution capabilities in a single place , with a business process-centered approach designed specifically for SAP and Oracle testing, risk-based testing and test automation, to ensure the most efficient and effective large-scale testing possible.

 

Sample Customers

Cap Gemini
Over 3000 leading enterprises worldwide including SONY, NICE, NEC, Shiseido, DHL, ABB and Grupo Bimbo
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
November 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, BrowserStack and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: November 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.