Panaya Test Dynamix vs Worksoft Certify comparison

Panaya and Worksoft are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. Panaya is ranked #21 with an average rating of 8.0, while Worksoft is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.7. Panaya holds a 1.1% mindshare in FT, compared to Worksoft’s 5.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Panaya users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Worksoft users who would recommend it.

Panaya Test Dynamix

Read 4 Panaya Test Dynamix reviews

852 Views
450 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Worksoft Certify

Read 66 Worksoft Certify reviews

4,920 Views
2,577 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Panaya Test Dynamix

Worksoft Certify

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Worksoft Certify and Panaya Test Dynamix are competitors in test automation and management. Worksoft Certify is preferred for integration capabilities, while Panaya Test Dynamix excels in analytics and reporting.

Features: Worksoft Certify offers advanced integration with enterprise applications, robust automation for end-to-end business process testing, and parameter-driven action steps for ease of automation. Panaya Test Dynamix provides advanced analytics, actionable insights, and quick adaptability to changes in enterprise environments.

Room for Improvement: Worksoft Certify could enhance its analytics capabilities, improve adaptability to rapidly changing environments, and reduce its initial setup complexity. Panaya Test Dynamix may benefit from better integration with a wider range of enterprise applications, more comprehensive automation features, and enhanced end-to-end testing breadth.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Worksoft Certify integrates seamlessly with existing systems for easy setup and has responsive customer support. Panaya Test Dynamix offers rapid cloud-based deployment, which cuts down setup time, and has strong support focused on analytics and problem resolution.

Pricing and ROI: Worksoft Certify involves higher setup costs with promises of significant ROI through its automation and integration benefits. Panaya Test Dynamix is competitively priced, offering quick ROI through faster deployment and efficient test management.

To learn more, read our detailed Panaya Test Dynamix vs. Worksoft Certify Report (Updated: November 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Panaya Test Dynamix vs. Worksoft Certify

November 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Panaya Test Dynamix

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

21st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Defect Tracking (1st), Test Management Tools (11th), Regression Testing Tools (10th)

Worksoft Certify

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

8th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Testing Tools (7th), Test Automation Tools (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Panaya Test Dynamix is 1.1%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Worksoft Certify is 5.4%, up from 4.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Alain Vanhaeght

IT Project leader at a construction company with 10,001+ employees

More than reliable, with satisfied results for our needs, and excellent testing options

For the moment we are looking to automated testing, and there today apparently it is not working well with the application we want to test. So we are using an application on a terminal server and some quirks make it challenging to make automatic testing. It would be nice to be able to test offline. What I mean by that is today most of the time things are in the cloud, but sometimes when we are in factories we do not have network access and we should be able to download a test script into our PCs and do the test offline. Once that is complete we can re-upload it when we again have a network connection.

Read full review

Shailesh-Parkhe

Manager-Projects at Cognizant

Powerful automation tool with a user-friendly interface, codeless automation, and adaptability to complex business processes, particularly in SAP environments

The tool itself is highly effective, especially when it comes to comprehensibility for newcomers. Even during the initial learning phase, I found it remarkably user-friendly. It facilitates quick onboarding and training of new resources. It offers features for building automation scripts, such as search and certify capture. A notable advantage is that it doesn't rely on other tools like Micro Focus UFT or Micro Focus ALM for script execution. Worksoft can run independently without the need for support from Microsoft Office, although the option to use it for maintaining data exists. The tool also includes debugging features and comprehensive reporting capabilities, generating PDF reports for easy analysis.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The test repository to follow the test progress is most valuable because we can easily create and manage a huge number of test scripts. We can copy and paste, replicate, and drag and drop many tests scripts. We can create test scripts en masse. When you have a high volume of tests, the tool is quite useful. It works well when you want to manage a lot of tests, such as you have 1,000 or more test scripts."

"Provides better monitoring for testing campaigns and business process testing."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to copy the scenarios and as we do a rollout we can efficiently complete test three and put it somewhere else under a new subsidiary."

"It is easy for business users to use who are not familiar with testing tools."

"The initial setup was not complex and the product itself is very easy to configure and use."

"Test migration from HPE are done automatically. We can extract our tests from HPE, and they convert it into the Panaya format."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to automate quickly and to maintain and update scripts."

"The easy of use and ease of integration of Worksoft Certify are very good."

"We love the Capture 2.0 feature. It seems to work very well."

"Our business users are doing regression testing as their day job. This is an add-on to their daily work. With everything so pressured in the industry, automation takes the pressure of these users."

"With autotesting, we have been able to eliminate duplication of test cases across those four areas. This has helped us knock down our number of test cases. Our test cases are also running more optimally. Therefore, it has very much helped in that sense, so we were able to eliminate a lot of test cases and get out of manual silos by running on autotesting, which is more efficient."

"Worksoft Certify supports multiple interfaces and applications like SAP, Web, or Silverlight Java, and Mainframe. It is easily integrated."

"We prefer Worksoft over other platforms because it's a low-code solution"

"Certify integrates with other tools and it works very well with other machine testing applications."

More Worksoft Certify pros

Cons

"They provide options for custom fields or tabs, but customization of workflows would be great."

"It would be nice to be able to test offline. What I mean by that is today most of the time things are in the cloud, but sometimes when we are in factories and we do not have network access and we should be able to download a test script into our PCs and do the test offline. Once that is complete we can re-upload it when we have a network connection."

"The setup of Panaya Recorder is a bit complex. Panaya is a SaaS application, but you need to install some components on your computer. You need to set up your computer to allow Panaya Recorder to work. There are five or six things to do each time you install Panaya for any user. If you miss something, Panaya Recorder doesn't work. So, it is complex to install."

"Support is reactive and in English only."

"When it is unstable, there will be times when a test that we are running in Certify will just stop, and it will say, "Aborted." There will be errors. There will be no explanation as to why it happens. It has now happened maybe one out of 20 times. When it happens, I just tell our QA team to stop Certify and restart it, hoping we don't see it again."

"Worksoft Certify's support team should respond more promptly when we are stuck with certain issues and looking for a solution."

"The web application should be more robust."

"What could be improved in Worksoft Certify is its integration with other tools, for example, test management tools such as Jira, ALM, or any other test management tools. That integration is missing."

"Worksoft Certify needs a bit of improvement for its web-based processes. It can be difficult because you need to recall the maps, then you still have to add-on for your browser. When you are using the browser-based testing, you cannot even move your mouse or do anything on your system when you are using the web-based testing. Therefore, it needs a bit of improvement on that side. While it does work, it needs improvement. From the SAP side, there is nothing better than Worksoft Certify. However, from the web-based, we are moving towards Fiori. SAP will soon be totally web-based. For Fiori, they need to be great with SAP testing. Thus, Worksoft has to improve the web-based testing part for Certify."

"Performance on the web UI part, especially with some of the more comprehensive Fiori features, like the complex tables that are being used, could be improved. In those cases we have noticed a lot of execution-time increase with regards to the Certify solution."

"Capture 2.0 is not as useful when you get into more mature automation."

"For the couple of the issues that we were really scratching our heads over, we were in communication with the technical support several times, but they never got back to us."

More Worksoft Certify cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is rather expensive due to the security it has to offer."

"It is expensive. Because of its cost, we couldn't deploy Panaya to a large extent. Its licensing should be improved, and there should be more license types. There should be an advanced license and a basic license."

"The price is in line with everyone else's in the market. They are not cheaper nor more expensive than anyone else who was in our RFP."

"It is costly. It is a bit more expensive than Tricentis Tosca and other tools. If they reduce its price going forward and have partnerships with other vendors, it will grow like anything."

"Worksoft Certify is priced higher than most tools."

"On our last big SAP implementation project, we inserted an automation resource into the beginning of the project. Between automating regression processes, data staging, and using our automation to help repair cutover and conversion issues. We saved the project about $1,700,000."

"Worksoft Capture 2.0 can help our customers to accelerate their automation development at least 40 percent faster than any other commercial tools available in the market."

"If we do one manual process, it could take approximately two hours. The same process using Worksoft probably takes ten minutes."

"The initial investment is probably a little high. It was a little hard for me to sell, but it was a one-shot deal and that's why it's so high. All we are doing now is paying annual maintenance, which we don't have to do if we don't want upgrades, but we do."

"We could use Certify to do robotic process automation, which is basically running a process on your correction system instead of your test system. Therefore, we may do that in the future."

More Worksoft Certify pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

21%

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

18%

Computer Software Company

11%

Retailer

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Panaya Test Dynamix?

The most valuable feature is the ability to copy the scenarios and as we do a rollout we can efficiently complete test three and put it somewhere else under a new subsidiary.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Panaya Test Dynamix?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Panaya Test Dynamix?

Our primary use case is for our process and we have different phases where we do testing and we have what we called IT and BPA testing. So it is a combined group of IT people and business people do...

See all answers

How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?

Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...

See all answers

What do you like most about Worksoft Certify?

A specific feature that I found to be the most valuable in the solution for our company's work processes stems from the fact that it is useful as a low-code automation tool.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Worksoft Certify?

The tool is worth the money.

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs Panaya Test Dynamix

Compared 67% of the time

Tricentis qTest vs Panaya Test Dynamix

Compared 14% of the time

OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs Panaya Test Dynamix

Compared 8% of the time

More Panaya Test Dynamix Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 65% of the time

Selenium HQ vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 13% of the time

OpenText UFT One vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 6% of the time

UiPath Test Suite vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 5% of the time

LEAPWORK vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 2% of the time

More Worksoft Certify Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Test Management Tools

December 2024

Download Panaya Test Dynamix product report

Buyer's Guide

Worksoft Certify

November 2024

Download Worksoft Certify product report

Learn More

Panaya

Worksoft

Overview

Panaya Test Dynamix makes it easy for large enterprises to test smarter and release faster, by gaining control and visibility of every aspect of their ERP testing wherever they are.

With SAP ERP testing holding unique challenges, Test Dynamix offers provides all test management and execution capabilities in a single place , with a business process-centered approach designed specifically for SAP and Oracle testing, risk-based testing and test automation, to ensure the most efficient and effective large-scale testing possible.

Worksoft Certify is the industry's first codeless automated testing system, created for non-technical people to test end-to-end business processes at an enterprise scale.

It was designed to test complicated processes spanning numerous apps and integrating into contemporary DevOps tool chains. Worksoft Certify manages dynamic input, process flows, and frequent variances in business processes with ease.

Worksoft Certify automates the testing of your exact business processes across all of your enterprise applications. This solution makes it simple for customers and suppliers to package a process with all of its related dependencies, sub-processes, record sets, record filters, layouts, and variables.

Worksoft Certify automates tests as effortlessly and quickly as the underlying applications permit, allowing you to evaluate business processes in record time with flawless dependability and consistency. Worksoft Certify speeds up test automation by utilizing a patented Object Action Framework, which effectively models the application under test as a set of pages containing GUI objects and test steps that perform actions on those objects.

Worksoft Certify Features

Worksoft Certify has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

LiveTouch: Without coding, graphically edit and update tests.

No "fail" tests: See fail validations flagged when the end-to-end test continues.

Process comparison: Visually compare tests side by side and eliminate unnecessary tests to reduce maintenance

Magic search: AI-driven process search can find duplicate processes and keep automation libraries clean.

Exploratory testing: Real-time automated exploratory tests.

API testing: Utilize the virtual services and current SoapUI tests.

Test data generator: Obtain data from SAP for testing.

Create content: Make use of the more than 300 prebuilt SAP end-to-end testing scenarios.

Visual capture: Support agile testing by using automation artifacts from process discovery.

Full compatibility: Web, Java, .Net, client/server applications, SAP GUI, FIORI, web portal Workday, Salesforce, ServiceNow, Ariba, SuccessFactors, Hybris, AJAX, and more.

Worksoft Certify Benefits

There are many benefits to implementing Worksoft Certify. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

Speed: Automate at least 80% of testing to accelerate innovation.

Savings: Reduce overall testing and maintenance expenditures by 60% to 80%.

Confidence: Identify defects faster and reduce production defects by 60%.

DevOps-ready: Run tests as part of continuous integration, testing, or delivery cycle.

Support for RPA: Convert test scripts into robotic process automation.

Reviews from Real Users

Jens N., Enterprise Architect SAP Solutions at a computer software company, writes, “As compared to other tools for test automation, what is very good in this tool is the ability to implement logic into the scripts without coding and learning a complex script language. It is comparable to defining formulas in Excel. It is pretty easy to learn how to make your scripts more intelligent and more flexible as per the situation.”

Aditya C., Sr Test Automation Architect at a tech services company, notes, “The most valuable features of Worksoft Certify are the way we can maintain the processes and sub-processes inside. We can immediately identify and replicate multiple objects in the application without having a major issue with it.”

Sample Customers

Over 3000 leading enterprises worldwide including SONY, NICE, NEC, Shiseido, DHL, ABB and Grupo Bimbo

Kraft, Reliant Energy, Richemont, Applied Materials, Siemens PLM, Mosaic, Dow Corning, ebay, IBM, Accenture, Fortis BC, US Government, Southwest Airlines

Buyer's Guide

Panaya Test Dynamix vs. Worksoft Certify

November 2024

Free Report: Panaya Test Dynamix vs. Worksoft Certify

Find out what your peers are saying about Panaya Test Dynamix vs. Worksoft Certify and other solutions. Updated: November 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Panaya Test Dynamix vs. Worksoft Certify report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.