Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Panaya Test Dynamix vs Tricentis Tosca comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Users praise Panaya Test Dynamix customer service for prompt, knowledgeable, and efficient support with effective communication and problem-solving skills.
Sentiment score
7.1
Tricentis Tosca's customer service is praised for responsiveness but criticized for delays and inconsistent resolution times.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
5.8
Panaya Test Dynamix requires better customization, clearer error messages, improved performance, enhanced integration, easier navigation, and more comprehensive training resources.
Sentiment score
3.4
Tricentis Tosca needs improvements in integrations, performance, UI testing, AI features, mobile support, and better customer support.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.1
Panaya Test Dynamix is praised for scalability, efficient test case management, integration, reliability, and performance under large workloads.
Sentiment score
7.7
Tricentis Tosca is highly scalable for various applications, though there are some infrastructure and licensing cost challenges.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Panaya Test Dynamix offers competitive, scalable, and cost-effective pricing with customizable packages to meet diverse organizational testing needs.
No sentiment score available
Tricentis Tosca's high licensing costs and complexity are often prohibitive for smaller organizations but beneficial for large enterprises.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.5
Panaya Test Dynamix stands out for its stability, reliability, and efficient performance, excelling under heavy workflows and various conditions.
Sentiment score
6.7
Tricentis Tosca is stable, reliable, and highly rated, despite occasional minor issues with environment, network, and cloud storage.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.0
Users praise Panaya Test Dynamix for its automation, detailed reporting, ease of use, seamless integration, and efficient defect management.
Sentiment score
7.4
Tricentis Tosca excels in scriptless automation, model-based testing, and ease of use, making it ideal for comprehensive testing.
 

Categories and Ranking

Panaya Test Dynamix
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
22nd
Ranking in Regression Testing Tools
10th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Defect Tracking (2nd), Test Management Tools (12th)
Tricentis Tosca
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
1st
Ranking in Regression Testing Tools
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
107
Ranking in other categories
Mobile App Testing Tools (1st), API Testing Tools (1st), Test Automation Tools (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Panaya Test Dynamix is 1.1%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tricentis Tosca is 18.5%, up from 14.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Functional Testing Tools
 

Q&A Highlights

JS
Jun 03, 2021
 

Featured Reviews

Alain Vanhaeght - PeerSpot reviewer
More than reliable, with satisfied results for our needs, and excellent testing options
For the moment we are looking to automated testing, and there today apparently it is not working well with the application we want to test. So we are using an application on a terminal server and some quirks make it challenging to make automatic testing. It would be nice to be able to test offline. What I mean by that is today most of the time things are in the cloud, but sometimes when we are in factories we do not have network access and we should be able to download a test script into our PCs and do the test offline. Once that is complete we can re-upload it when we again have a network connection.
Antonio Oteri - PeerSpot reviewer
Ability to automate tests across various platforms and simplifies test creation
From what I've seen with my colleagues who make the software selection, the prices for this software in Brazil are too expensive to be applied to anything but huge customers. I'm surprised because I was in charge of planning and control at the company before, when there was a manager there. Normally, the company has structural licenses that are based on the company they are selling to. I see that these companies cannot spend this money on Tricentis. I think Tosca is losing this type of market. They should have a different license policy for medium and small companies. The same happened in the past with SAP, which changed its policy and also made licenses for low.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Answers from the Community

JS
Jun 3, 2021
Jun 3, 2021
@Jesús Antonio Santos Giraldo; both companies deliver excellent tools & services. It's going to come down to your use cases. If you choose the wrong tool for your use case the risks are: Loss of time, money and opportunities. That's not going to be the tool's fault. Tips that may help you in deciding: - Use your current tools / last tools as benchmark to determine your future needs. -...
2 out of 4 answers
IP
May 11, 2021
Panaya and Tricentis are both good. Could you share more info on your use case and what are your key selection criteria ?
EB
May 22, 2021
@Jesús Antonio Santos Giraldo ​, can you please share more details about your case as suggested by @John ​so that our peers can assist you with your queston?
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
20%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Retailer
6%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Insurance Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Panaya Test Dynamix?
The most valuable feature is the ability to copy the scenarios and as we do a rollout we can efficiently complete test three and put it somewhere else under a new subsidiary.
What needs improvement with Panaya Test Dynamix?
For the moment we are looking to automated testing, and there today apparently it is not working well with the application we want to test. So we are using an application on a terminal server and s...
What is your primary use case for Panaya Test Dynamix?
Our primary use case is for our process and we have different phases where we do testing and we have what we called IT and BPA testing. So it is a combined group of IT people and business people do...
How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?
We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...
How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?
Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...
What do you like most about Tricentis Tosca?
For beginners, the product is good, especially for those who are interested in the quality side of software testing.
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Over 3000 leading enterprises worldwide including SONY, NICE, NEC, Shiseido, DHL, ABB and Grupo Bimbo
HBO, AMEX, BMW Group, ING, Bosch, Austrian Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Henkel, Allianz, Bank of America, UBS, Orange, Siemens, Swiss Re, Vodafone
Find out what your peers are saying about Panaya Test Dynamix vs. Tricentis Tosca and other solutions. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.