OpenText UFT One and Tricentis Tosca compete in the test automation category. Tricentis Tosca appears to have an edge due to its model-based and scriptless automation approach, making it accessible for non-technical users and supporting a broad technology range.
Features: OpenText UFT One supports a wide array of technologies, offering features such as cross-browser compatibility, integration with ALM, and valued object recognition and scripting capabilities. Tricentis Tosca emphasizes scriptless automation with a model-based approach, simplifying the testing process for non-technical users. It supports technologies including web, mobile, and mainframe applications, and offers efficient data management and modular testing.
Room for Improvement: OpenText UFT One could benefit from enhanced browser and environment compatibility, reduced resource consumption, and better support for users with limited programming skills. Tricentis Tosca faces challenges with high licensing costs, performance issues in some features like object recognition, and its pricing model could be more competitive with improved integration with other tools and platforms.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText UFT One is mainly on-premises with some cloud deployment options, and user feedback on support varies based on the contract. Tricentis Tosca offers flexible deployment, including hybrid and public cloud options, generally receiving praise for support, though some users experience slower than expected service.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText UFT One is considered expensive, but its extensive features and potential high ROI justify the cost for many. Tricentis Tosca is also pricey but justifies its cost through automation efficiency and a comprehensive feature set, delivering substantial ROI, especially for mid-to-large enterprises.
The development time using UFT can be cut down into half as compared to coding from scratch.
Automation is done very fast, leading to improvements in the QA process and reducing the time needed for test automation.
We can easily achieve a return on investment in one, two, or three years.
After creating a ticket, it takes three to five days for them to acknowledge it and then send it to somebody.
Support cases are easily created and attended to promptly, depending on urgency.
The technical support is rated eight out of ten.
There is no way to mark the importance or criticality of incidents when creating them.
Response through chat has been replaced by chatbots, which has impacted the experience.
The tool can be installed on all computers used by developers or test automation engineers.
I find stability issues when using the Vision AI feature; Tricentis Tosca is not very stable.
If it could move closer to a no-code or low-code solution, it might dominate the market again.
Incorporating behavior-driven development tests would enhance the capabilities of UFT One.
Moving to a cloud-based application rather than a desktop one could improve Tosca.
The Vision AI implementation works very slowly, affecting the speed of our work.
The pricing or licensing policy of OpenText is a bit expensive, however, it's one of the best solutions in the market.
It's cheaper than Tricentis Tosca but more expensive than some others.
There are many open-source tools with no cost, and there are no-code tools that are less expensive than UFT.
A yearly license costs around 20,000 euros.
For enterprise customers, the cost is manageable because it provides solutions for multiple applications they want to automate.
UFT supports Oracle, SAP, PeopleSoft, and other non-web applications, making automation feasible.
The object repository is one of the best in the market, allowing creation of a repository useful for all tests.
The OpenText solution is the best of breed and the best solution on the market for large customers.
The most useful features of Tricentis Tosca include API scanning, basic web application automation, and data validation capabilities.
It allows for drag-and-drop functionality and demo automation in SAP-based applications, which can be challenging with other automation tools.
Our AI-powered functional testing tool accelerates test automation. It works across desktop, web, mobile, mainframe, composite, and packaged enterprise-grade applications.
Read white paper
Tricentis Tosca is primarily leveraged for test automation across web, SAP, API, and mainframe applications, offering robust support for both regression and functional testing.
Tricentis Tosca's test automation capabilities extend to front-end and back-end testing, including processes like RPA and UI-based regression tests on Microsoft Windows. It supports Agile environments with multiple applications, enabling Salesforce automation, API endpoints, and end-to-end automation workflows. Tosca caters to diverse testing needs, integrating well with tools like Jenkins and Bamboo, although upgrades and customizations present challenges. Licensing costs and performance issues during loading and scanning are concerns, along with substantial learning curves for new users. Enhanced AI features and better reporting are on users' wishlist.
What are the key features of Tricentis Tosca?Tricentis Tosca is implemented across various industries, serving sectors like finance, healthcare, and retail with test automation solutions to ensure application quality and reliability. Agile teams in these industries benefit from its multi-application support and ability to manage complex end-to-end testing workflows. The tool's integration capabilities are particularly useful in environments that rely on CI/CD pipelines, ensuring continuous testing and quick feedback loops.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.